Waihopai Playcentre

Education institution number:
90024
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
11
Telephone:
Address:

98 Layard Street, Invercargill

View on map

Waihopai Playcentre - 10/04/2017

1 Evaluation of Waihopai Playcentre

How well placed is Waihopai Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Waihopai Playcentre is parent led and provides two sessions each week for children up to school age. The sessions are led by an experienced, paid supervisor with the help of members.

Playcentre parents are gaining Playcentre qualifications by being involved in the adult-education training programme provided by the Southland Playcentre Association (SPA).

The SPA is experiencing a time of change as all playcentre associations throughout New Zealand merge with the New Zealand Playcentre Federation (NZPF) to reduce duplication and make cost savings. This restructure will mean significant changes at the local association level. An interim board is being established at SPA to support playcentres through this transitional period.

The October 2013 ERO report identified a number of areas for review and development. These included: supporting children and families for their move to school; reducing documentation workload for parent members; philosophy review; and strengthening strategic planning. These have been addressed.

This review was part of a cluster of 13 in the Southland Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

The playcentre philosophy is strongly evident in practice. Parents learn alongside their children. They model respectful relationships and positive interactions. Children share and collaborate. They are confident explorers and show care and concern for one another. Infants and toddlers learn alongside their older friends.

Most adults notice, recognise and respond appropriately to children's interests and previous learning. More experienced playcentre parents model assessment practices for newer members. A revised approach to assessment has recently been introduced to better support parent participation. Members should continue to embed this approach to promote consistency in assessment practices.

Warm, responsive and reciprocal relationships are a strength of the playcentre. Parent members are supportive of one another and are involved in all children's learning. Team work is highly evident.

Children and adults are warmly welcomed into the playcentre in a gradual, unhurried manner. They are encouraged to settle at their own pace. A useful range of strategies supports older children and families as they prepare for their move to school.

Bicultural practices are evident in routines, resources and cultural celebrations. Members recognise a need to strengthen this approach across playcentre programmes and to further develop their understanding of supporting Māori children's learning. ERO's evaluation affirms this development.

Self review for improvement is ongoing and has led to positive change. The focus for internal evaluation has recently progressed from how adults can solve a problem to how well the curriculum and teaching practices are supporting improved outcomes for children. Parent members should continue to strengthen this approach.

The board has been proactive in developing processes to assist in the smooth transition for playcentres to work under the NZPF. Opportunities have been offered to playcentre members to engage with SPA to consider how they can best support services through the impending restructure.

The board has identified a number of systems and processes have lapsed and need improvement. Immediate attention is required to review policies that guide the appointments procedure and health and safety practices. The appraisal process has also lapsed, or not been robustly implemented. These improvements are a priority to meet licensing criteria, and for monitoring the quality of centre practices.

More consistent, timely and evaluative reporting should be provided to the board to assure them that accountabilities are met and to better inform their decision making.

Key Next Steps

The playcentre supervisor and members agree areas for strengthening include:

  • developing members' knowledge and understanding of bicultural practices and of supporting Māori children's learning

  • continuing to strengthen internal evaluation

  • continuing to promote consistency in assessment practices.

Key next steps for the association are to:

  • review SPA policies, giving priority to those related to appointments and health and safety practices

  • re-establish the appraisal process

  • facilitate the evaluative reporting to the board. 

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Waihopai Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO also identified areas of non-compliance for the Southland Playcentre Association in relation to governance and management. To meet requirements the association needs to:

  • implement a system of regular appraisal. [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA7]

To improve practice the Southland Playcentre Association should:

  • ensure policies and procedures for travel by a motor vehicle clearly specify the person responsible for excursion approvals has verified all drivers have a current full New Zealand driver licence and each vehicle is registered and has a current warrant of fitness.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Waihopai Playcentre will be in three years.

Joyce Gebbie

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

10 April 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Invercargill

Ministry of Education profile number

90024

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

13

Gender composition

Girls 7, Boys 6

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Other ethnic group

2

10

1

Reported ratios of adults to children

Under 2

1:2

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2017

Date of this report

10 April 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

October 2013

Education Review

May 2010

Education Review

April 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Waihopai Playcentre - 09/10/2013

1 Evaluation of Waihopai Playcentre

How well placed is Waihopai Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Children at Waihopai Playcentre benefit from rich learning experiences.

Waihopai Playcentre is one of 19 centres governed by the Southland Playcentre Association (SPA). It is located in the Windsor area and provides three parent-led sessions a week for up to twenty children aged birth to five years. Children attend multiple sessions each week. A number of families attend from the wider Invercargill area.

The centre hosts a weekly Supporting Parents Alongside Children’s Education (SPACE) session for first-time parents with young babies. Many parents have joined the centre as a result of participating in the SPACE programme.

There is a strong culture of adult education within the centre. There are capable leadership skills within the parent group. Many parents stay for the sessions and involve themselves in their children’s play and learning.

The parents have proactively responded to the recommendations of the 2010 ERO report. In particular, they have improved the way they plan for individual children’s learning and for group programmes. Parents have clear roles and responsibilities which contribute to the smooth running of the sessions.

This review was part of a cluster of 17 reviews in the SPA.

The Review Findings

Environment. Children benefit greatly from a richly resourced indoor area that supports their early literacy and numeracy development. There is an extensive range of materials suitable for all ages. This stimulates children’s play and learning in many ways, for example, in creative and imaginative play, construction and problem solving. The outdoor area has many resources for children to explore and to develop their physical skills.

Interactions. Parents work closely with their own and other children to support learning and to help children develop their social skills. They often join in with children’s play. Parents have purposeful conversations to extend children’s learning and understanding. They know the children and each other well. This enables them to make close links between children’s homes and the centre. Parents deliberately teach children how to work and play harmoniously with other children. They support children with learning how to learn through persevering to complete tasks.

Child-led programme. Children contribute to the decision making in the programme. Their wishes are respected and acted on by the parents. Children may choose to play independently or together.

Focus on learning. Children’s learning is the main priority in the sessions. Before sessions the duty parents discuss children’s learning goals and how parents could support these. After sessions parents reflect on the learning they have noticed and discuss improvements that could be made to enrich and extend this.

Programmes. The group and individual programmes are strong.

They develop over time.

Children’s interests are used as a context for learning.

Prior experiences are built on and used to extend children’s learning.

The programmes include literacy, numeracy, imaginative play and social development.

Children revisit experiences often over extended periods of time.

There is a wide variety of activities for children within and beyond the centre.

Māori dimensions are evident in the environment and programme.

Learning stories show that parents notice and recognise learning and suggest possible next steps. Parents are well informed about how to support all children’s learning as the goals are prominently displayed.

SPA Support. The SPA provides strong support to the playcentre through:

  • ongoing adult education
  • twice-termly visits from the playcentre liaison officer
  • advice and guidance from a Māori liaison officer
  • property and maintenance advice
  • additional funding as required
  • help to meet relicensing requirements
  • a policy and strategic planning framework
  • sound governance practices.

The SPA provides strong leadership to guide the future direction and ongoing improvement of all its centres. This includes the way association team members foster emergent leadership. Currently there are high numbers of people participating in playcentre training. The association has identified, and ERO agrees, that its next step is to improve its knowledge and understanding of self review. It then needs to support playcentres to implement effective self review.

Key Next Steps

The parents with the support of SPA need to develop their knowledge, understanding and use of self review to monitor the centre’s effectiveness in an ongoing way. Aspects for review should include:

  • the philosophy to show their desired outcomes for children and their shared values and beliefs
  • the amount of documentation in the centre to reduce parent workload
  • how well children are supported as they approach starting school.

The strategic plan would be a more useful document if it contained details about how the goals might be met and indicators of what good practice would look like. It should also have a greater focus on improving outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Waihopai Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Waihopai Playcentre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services Southern Region

9 October 2013

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Invercargill

Ministry of Education profile number

90024

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

22

Gender composition

Girls: 15

Boys: 7

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā

22

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

N/A

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

August 2013

Date of this report

9 October 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

May 2010

 

Education Review

April 2006

 

Accountability Review

October 2001

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.