Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre

Education institution number:
70032
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
28
Telephone:
Address:

Community Centre Landsdowne Terrace, Cashmere, Christchurch

View on map

Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre - 21/08/2019

1 Evaluation of Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre

How well placed is Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre operates as a parent cooperative under the governance and management of the Playcentre Federation, Upper South Island Region. This centre is licensed for up to 30 children, including 10 children under two. The centre is open four mornings a week. It operates from a community hall and has a large outdoor play space.

The playcentre employs four coordinators. Parents are rostered to help at each session. The Upper South Island Region employs a centre support person and an administrator who regularly visit the playcentre to support the parents and coordinator.

The centre's philosophy places a strong emphasis on the centre operating as a parent cooperative. It identifies the important role of parents in their children's learning and wellbeing. It states that the programme is child-led, inclusive and that children and their whānau will develop a strong sense of wellbeing.

At the end of 2018, three new centre coordinators were appointed. A number of parents are also new to the playcentre. The parent cooperative has made progress to meet the recommendations in the 2014 ERO report. However, the inclusion of te ao Māori, assessment, planning and evaluation and strategic planning still need to be improved.

This review was part of a cluster of eight playcentre reviews in the Playcentre Federation, Upper South Island Region.

The Review Findings

Children are happy, settled and fully engaged in the programme. The wide range of activities and resources in the indoor and outdoor play areas are easy for children to access. They are presented in ways that encourage child exploration and participation. Systems have also been established to help children know about additional resources and how to access them easily.

Children are confident learners who lead their learning in the playcentre environment. They are well supported by caring adults who know each child's interests, dispositions and skills well. Adults consciously encourage children to work at their own pace, problem solve and persist to experience success in their learning. Learning is ongoing and appropriate for each child.

Children are social, inclusive and accepting of others. Older children show care for babies and include younger children in their learning. Children with additional needs are well supported and included by adults and other children in activities and learning experiences.

Te reo and tikanga Māori is beginning to be included in the programme. Māori parents are being invited to become more involved in this aspect of the curriculum. A recent parent questionnaire identified te ao Māori as an area for further development. The strategic plan provides clear direction on how the parent group intends to strengthen te reo and tikanga Māori in the programme.

A number of children are now staying at the playcentre to school age. Establishing transition to school procedures would help for smooth transition to school for children and their families.

Systems and procedures for planning, assessment and evaluation are in place but some processes need to be extended to better support children's learning. All adults are involved in assessment, planning and evaluation for the programme and individual children. They are beginning to seek parent aspirations for learning. They now need to focus more on identifying children's learning goals and teaching strategies to promote this learning. Adults should also evaluate the outcomes for children and the effectiveness of the group programmes. Inclusion of te reo and tikanga Māori and children's home cultures would also improve assessment, planning and evaluation practices.

The centre operates well as a parent cooperative. The environment is welcoming and supportive. Expectations for new members are clear. Parents' skills are valued and well used to benefit all children and adults. There is a strong culture of shared decision making, respecting others and collaboration. The parent education programme is valued and is helping this new group of parents to better understand all aspects of playcentre.

Internal evaluation is well established and used to identify and make improvements to the programme and operation of the centre. It involves all parents and often children. Systems and processes are clear and well understood. In-depth analysis of evaluation findings is undertaken, and implementation of action plans monitored. To improve internal evaluation further, the parent group should identify outcomes for children and what strategies worked well.

The strategic plan provides clear direction for ongoing improvement and has resulted from internal evaluation and support from the Upper South Island Region. Regular monitoring of implementation of the plan and clear outcomes for children should ensure improvements continue to occur.

The confidence, knowledge and commitment to playcentre of parents and coordinators is increasing as a result of ongoing support and guidance from the Upper South Island Region.

Key Next Steps

The Upper South Island Region and ERO agree that the key next steps for the parent cooperative to continue to improve outcomes for children include:

  • increasing parent understanding and knowledge of Te Whāriki 2017 to improve assessment, planning and programme evaluation processes and practices

  • implementing, monitoring and evaluating the impact of the strategic goals with an emphasis on strengthening te ao Māori knowledge and practices

  • further refining internal evaluation to include outcomes for children and to identify what strategies worked well

  • developing transition to school procedures as more children approaching school age are attending the playcentre.

Upper South Island Regional Governance

There continues to be significant change occurring with the playcentre's governance and management at regional and federation levels.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services Te Tai Tini

Southern Region

21 August 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

70032

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

39

Gender composition

Girls 19, Boys 20

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā
Other ethnicities

27
12

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

June 2019

Date of this report

21 August 2019

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

November 2014

Education Review

March 2012

Education Review

June 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre - 25/11/2014

1 Evaluation of Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre

How well placed is Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre is' well placed' to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

This playcentre operates under the guidance of the Canterbury Playcentre Association. The playcentre is a parent cooperative. Parents are encouraged to be involved in all aspects of the programme and centre operation.

Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre has four morning sessions a week.

Since the 2012 ERO review, parents are focusing more on using children’s ideas to develop their play. The centre is increasing the use of te reo Māori and include bicultural aspects in the programme. However, this is still an area that needs to be strengthened.

This review was part of a cluster of 11 playcentre reviews in the Canterbury Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

A warm, welcoming environment is established for parents and children to interact together. Parents are attentive and nurture children’s developing interests. They encourage respect and children’s independence in order to develop happy, confident children.

Parents and children are active partners in play. Children are well supported by parents to initiate, listen and maintain positive relationships with others. Parents frequently have warm and encouraging conversations with children. Older children play well together and include younger children in conversations and in purposeful play.

Children are involved in making appropriate decisions about their learning. They have easy access to a wide variety of high-quality resources in a large open indoor and outdoor learning environment.

Parents make effective use of local community personnel and resources to extend children’s learning opportunities. Mathematics and literacy are frequently recognised and supported within the programme.

The centre is operating an effective parent cooperative. Parents have established many useful management systems to improve the effectiveness of the centre. There is a growing culture of reflective practice and self review. Long-term self review is collaborative, well managed and documented. The use of duty teams and a buddy system ensure appropriate support for new parents.

A large number of parents participate in playcentre training courses. Parent coordinators promote and actively support parents to seek additional qualifications beyond course one. Parents also create a large number of ways to support parents to become more confident and experienced in their role as first educators.

The centre is well supported by the Canterbury Playcentre Association.

Key Next Steps

The association, centre parents and ERO agree that the next steps for the centre are to:

  • continue to increase the inclusion of te reo, tikanga Māori and the home cultures of all children, particularly in learning stories
  • review assessment to ensure it gives good direction for parents working in the programme.

Canterbury Playcentre Association

This is the third cluster review of a number of playcentres that ERO has undertaken in collaboration with the association. Each of the previous cluster reviews have identified emerging strengths from all the playcentres reviewed. This process has resulted in key next steps for the association to further support playcentres to improve learning outcomes for children.

The association has made some good progress in addressing the recommendations from the previous two cluster reviews. This includes:

  • supporting children’s transitions to school
  • re-establishing the centre managers’ appraisal system
  • improving feedback from the centre support team to parent groups about the quality of teaching and learning.

Further work is required to develop a stronger understanding of the government’s focus on priority learners so that the association can better support parent groups to respond to these children.

There continues to be significant change occurring in the structure of governance and management at association and federation levels. This has had a major impact on the association’s positive response to ERO’s recommendation from the previous cluster review, to document future planning.

Key Next Steps for the Canterbury Playcentre Association

During this cluster review the association has identified, and ERO agrees, that the next steps for the association include:

  • helping parent groups more effectively sustain the developments in bicultural practices and strengthening the focus on Māori achieving success as Māori
  • reviewing assessment and planning processes to help adults identify children’s learning and the ways that adults can help children with their learning
  • developing a clear understanding of the process of strategic planning at association level and sharing this with parent groups
  • continuing to support and grow emergent leaders in playcentres.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Landsdowne Terrace Playcentre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services Southern Region

25 November 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

70032

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 10 aged under two

Service roll

55

Gender composition

Girls 30; Boys 25

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

3

52

Reported ratios of adult to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

August 2014

Date of this report

25 November 2014

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

March 2012

 

Education Review

June 2008

 

Education Review

June 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.