Future Kids

Education institution number:
55044
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
39
Telephone:
Address:

1200 Omahu Road, Woolwich, Hastings

View on map

Future Kids

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for Future Kids are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whakatō Emerging

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whakatō Emerging

Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

Future Kids Early Learning Centre operates under the Bay City Outreach Trust, led by a director and head teacher. Over a third of children enrolled are Māori and a small number are of Pacific heritages. Since the November 2021 ERO report, limited progress has been made with regards to the key next steps.

3 Summary of findings

Children actively engage in a curriculum that promotes their social and emotional development. Younger children learn in their own space in a calm and well-resourced environment. Their verbal and non-verbal cues are responded to. Oral literacy is promoted for all through sustained conversations between teachers and children. Children confidently lead their own learning, and they are supported to develop their social skills with their peers. 

Since ERO’s 2020 evaluation, te reo Māori and tikanga Māori are more evident through daily rituals such as karakia, waiata and tuakana-teina relationships (between younger and older children). Pacific and other cultures are celebrated. Perspectives and goals of whānau Māori and Pacific families are yet to contribute to children’s assessment and planning. 

Assessment for children's learning is in the early stages of development. Planning and intentional teaching focuses on transitioning into and through the service, and age-based learning to prepare children for school. The service philosophy based on Christian beliefs is evident. External support is in place to build teacher understanding of, and capability with, the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki the early childhood curriculum. 

Service leaders are beginning to develop the conditions that enable collaboration for improvement. They are starting to work together with teachers to build professional knowledge and cultural competence, to design a responsive curriculum. Staffing changes have impacted on the ability to build collective capacity in internal evaluation.

4 Improvement actions

Future Kids will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Provide opportunities for Māori and Pacific whānau to share their perspectives in relation to children’s assessment, planning and evaluation.
  • Continue to work with teachers in developing their understanding of the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki through assessment, planning and evaluation.
  • Build a collective understanding of the purpose and use of effective internal evaluation for improvement.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Future Kids completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

17 June 2024 

6 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service NameFuture Kids
Profile Number55044
LocationWoolwich, Hastings 
Service type Education and care service
Number licensed for 39 children, with no children aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 80-99%
Service roll31
Review team on siteApril 2024 
Date of this report17 June 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Akanuku | Assurance Review, November 2021; Education Review, June 2020

Future Kids

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Future Kids Preschool is a privately owned service. It operates under Bay City Outreach Centre Trust who has responsibility for governance and management. The centre Director is responsible for the day-to-day operation supported by a team leader and a pedagogical leader. The June 2020 ERO review identified the service as requiring further development.

Summary of Review Findings

Positive interactions enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships between adults and children. The curriculum is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation. Children’s language, culture and identity are respected and reflected in the curriculum. Teachers respect and acknowledge the interests and the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children.

The philosophy guides the service’s operation and is underpinned by Christian values and beliefs. Staff have engaged in external professional development opportunities. An ongoing process of review and evaluation is helping the service to maintain and improve the quality of education and care.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • continue to strengthen assessment, planning and evaluation with a focus on valued learning outcomes for children
  • increase the accessibility of curriculum resources in the outdoor environment to enhance learning and development for all children.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Shelley Booysen
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

24 November 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameFuture Kids
Profile Number55044
LocationHastings
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for39 children.
Percentage of qualified teachers80-99%
Service roll37
Ethnic compositionMāori 9, NZ European/Pākehā 11, Samoan 11, Other ethnic groups 6
Review team on siteOctober 2021
Date of this report24 November 2021
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, June 2020; Education Review, May 2017.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Future Kids - 15/06/2020

1 Evaluation of Future Kids

How well placed is Future Kids to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Future Kids requires further development to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

All key next steps identified in the May 2017 ERO report continue to require improvement. Systems, processes and practices need further development to enable the service to consistently provide positive outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Future Kids is a Christian preschool located in Hastings. It operates under the Bay City Trust. It offers education and care for up to 39 children, including six children up to two years. The current roll of 34 includes six who identify as Māori and 10 as Pacific. At the time of the review, no children under two years of age were enrolled.

The service is governed by a board and managed by a director. A head teacher is responsible for the day-to-day running of the service. All teachers are qualified early childhood teachers.

The philosophy is underpinned by Christian principles and values and 'preparing children for a life and love of learning'.

Since the May 2017 ERO review significant restructuring has resulted in the merger of Future Kids Queen Street, into Future Kids Omahu Road, subsequent staffing changes, a reduction in opening times and a decision to no longer enrol children up to two years.

The Review Findings

Leaders should continue to build knowledge and understandings of policies, procedures and practices and oversee systematic monitoring of these, to ensure all licensing requirements are consistently met.

The service's vision and values underpin the programme. Children are well engaged through a mixture of child and teacher-led activities that are responsive to their emerging interests. They access a wide range of resources that provide opportunities for them to investigate, be creative and engage in physical activity. Teachers use a range of strategies to maximise learning opportunities that promote literacy and mathematics.

A strong focus on building children's social and emotional competence is highly evident and builds their confidence and ability to develop relationships. They play well together for sustained periods of time and support each other's learning goals. Teachers work with parents to maintain consistent positive guidance strategies between home and the service.

A programme for four-year-olds provides opportunities for children to learn a range of skills and competencies that are likely to support a successful transition to school.

Children requiring additional learning support are well provided for. Teachers work collaboratively with parents and whānau to develop appropriate goals that support children's participation and engagement in learning. Progress in relation to these goals is monitored and celebrated.

Children's profile books provide a picture of their participation in the programme and what they can do. Children's ways of learning, social competencies and personalities are featured. Assessment, planning and evaluation practices need further development to:

  • make visible goal setting and planning for individual children that responds to parent aspirations
  • acknowledge children's culture, language and identity
  • show how learning relevant for each child is progressed over time.

Assessment, planning and evaluation practices was an area for development identified in the previous report and remains a priority for further development. With the proposed change of the leadership roles in the centre, trustees and leaders should ensure a shared understanding of expectations and oversight of implementation of change to promote high quality education and care.

A bicultural curriculum is in place. Teachers are at the beginning stages of making connections to children's whakapapa and are considering how best to support these connections through their learning. Teachers continue to explore and implement strategies that promote educational success for Māori.

Teachers have an awareness of Tapasā: Cultural Competencies Framework for Teachers of Pacific Learners. They have yet to collectively consider how these strategies are integrated into their practice. They also acknowledge that they are still growing their understanding of the range of Pacific cultures represented in their centre.

Regular review that leads to change is established. Trustees, leaders and teachers should develop a shared understanding of internal evaluation processes and practice to measure the quality and value of programmes and operation. This should enable them to make informed decisions that promote positive outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

ERO has identified that key next steps are to further develop:

  • consistent assessment, planning and evaluation practices that respond to the learning needs of individuals and acknowledge parent aspirations
  • teaching practices that promote successful outcomes for Māori and Pacific learners
  • shared understanding and use of internal evaluation
  • leadership that supports professional practice and promotes quality education and care.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Future Kids completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to governance, management and administration and health and safety. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • strengthen hazard checking and analysis of accidents to ensure hazards to the safety of children are eliminated, isolated or minimised
  • fire drills must be carried out on at least a three-monthly basis
  • all aspects of the child protection policy must be reviewed every three years
  • a written appointments procedure including safety checking all workers before they have access to children, that meets the safety checking requirements of the Children's Act 2014 and a record of all safety checks and the results.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008: HS1; HS8; HS31; GMA7; GMA7A]

[Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008, 46(1c, 1d); Children's Act 2014]

The service also needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • when children leave the premises on an excursion the excursion must be approved by the Person Responsible
  • a clear appraisal policy should be developed that includes reference to the Standards for the Teaching Profession.

Since the onsite phase of the review ERO has received evidence of steps taken to improve hazard checking, excursion approval, child protection and appraisal [H12; HS17; HS31].

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Darcy Te Hau

Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)

Central Region - Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

15 June 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationHastings
Ministry of Education profile number55044
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for39 children, including up to 6 aged under 2
Service roll34
Gender compositionMale 19, Female 15
Ethnic compositionMāori 
NZ European/Pākehā 
Pacific 
Other ethnic groups

12
10
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 2N/ANo under 2 enrolled
Over 21:8Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteFebruary 2020
Date of this report15 June 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewMay 2017
Education ReviewMarch 2017
Education ReviewFebruary 2014

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.