St Mary's Family Pre-School

Education institution number:
25091
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
13
Telephone:
Address:

10 Beatty Street, Otahuhu, Auckland

View on map

St Mary's Family Pre-School 

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

St Mary’s Family Pre-School is one of two services owned and operated under the umbrella of the Anglican Trust for Women and Children. A qualified centre manager supports a team of three certificated teachers and one unqualified teacher. The majority of children attending the service are of Māori or Pacific heritages. 

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The service curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. It is inclusive, and responsive. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences.

The service curriculum provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development. Teachers support children’s developing social competence and understanding of appropriate behaviour.

Leaders and teachers need to consistently monitor and make changes to policies and practices, when required, to remain compliant with all regulatory standards.  

Key Next Steps 

Next steps include:

  • Improve the extent to which teachers shared understanding of planning and assessment information shows children’s progress and learning overtime.
  • Increase the visibility of how teachers are responding to children’s interests and dispositions, and to parents’ aspirations in assessment, planning and evaluation information.

Actions for Compliance 

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances: 

  • Ensuring the service’s written emergency plan includes details of the roles and responsibilities that will apply during an emergency, a communication plan for families and support services and a list of safety and emergency supplies and resources sufficient for the number of children and adults at the service.
  • Evidence of how evaluation of relevant emergency drills has informed the annual review of the service’s emergency plan.
  • Ensuring daily checks of equipment, premises, and facilities for hazards to children include, but is not limited to all areas listed in the licensing criterion. This includes consideration of hazards present in laundry facilities, appliances (particularly heaters) and bodies of water.
  • Ensuring that before a person is employed or engaged as a children’s worker, and every three years thereafter, a safety check as required by the Children’s Act 2014 is completed. A detailed record of each component of the safety check must be kept, including the risk assessment required to be completed after all relevant information is obtained. A written procedure for safety checking that meet these requirements must also be in place.
    Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education & Care Services 2008; HS7, HS8, HS12, GMA7a.

Next ERO Review 

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

24 June 2024 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameSt Mary’s Family Pre-School
Profile Number25091
LocationOtahuhu, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for35 children, including up to 12 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 80-99%
Service roll18
Review team on siteApril 2024
Date of this report24 June 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, January 2019; Education Review, March 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate. 

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

 As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

 As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

St Mary's Family Pre-School - 31/01/2019

1 Evaluation of St Mary's Family Pre-School

How well placed is St Mary's Family Pre-School to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

St Mary's Family Pre-School is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

St Mary's Family Pre-School is one of two preschools operating under the umbrella of the Anglican Trust for Woman and Children (ATWC). It is licensed for 35 children, including 10 up to two years of age. Most children who attend the centre have Pacific heritage, while those with Māori heritage make up the next largest group.

The preschool provides all-day and sessional services. About 20 percent of the roll is made up of children whose parents attend an ATWC residential parenting programme. The preschool provides a programme based on "attachment theory and the circle of security".

A preschool manager has a governance role at the centre and reports to the Trust Service Delivery Manager. A centre supervisor has oversight of day-to-day operations and the curriculum.

The 2015 ERO report identified that development was necessary to improve programmes to meet children’s learning needs, internal evaluation and teacher appraisal. While some progress has been made in these areas, further work is necessary.

The Review Findings

Children are settled in the centre and demonstrate a sense of belonging. They play and learn in a welcoming environment that supports their physical and emotional wellbeing.

Mothers from the ATWC residential programme attend Wednesday morning sessions with their children. During this time, teachers and ATWC personnel coach the mothers about how to play and interact with their children with the aim of improving outcomes for children and families.

Infants and toddlers play in a separate inside area and share the playground with older children. Teachers focus on forming secure attachments between adults and children. Their responsive caregiving practices result in a calm environment. Teachers should now consider ways to provide children with a wider variety of activities, including sensory exploration. Better access to the outdoor environment would also enhance children's opportunities to learn and explore.

Teachers know children and families well and interact with them in attentive ways. They encourage children to make choices within a prepared environment. A strong ethic of care is embedded in their teaching approaches. A greater emphasis on helping children to develop more respectful approaches in their conversations with others would be a worthwhile development.

While teachers are working with children in small groups they should consider how they could more effectively respond to and extend children's thinking and learning. It would also be beneficial for children if they had more opportunities to express their ideas, problem solve, and lead their own learning.

Portfolios are an attractive record of children's participation in the programme. Assessment processes are developing. There are some good examples of teachers identifying children's individual interests and dispositions. In order to build on this good practice, teachers should document children's learning progress and how they plan to respond to children's interests, play and learning.

Teachers make curriculum decisions collaboratively. They are developing ways to gather parent aspirations and to reflect these within planning. Teachers are building their knowledge and understanding of the revised early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki 2017. Developing shared understandings about how to assess and plan for learning will improve teaching practice and learning outcomes.

Teachers understand the importance of promoting te reo and tikanga Māori. Continuing support for teachers to use te reo in the programme will help them to develop more consistent practices. Teachers could continue to find ways to reflect children's diverse cultures in the programme.

Centre policies and procedures are being developed. Continuing with regular policy reviews will assist teachers to ensure that policies are understood and implemented. Internal evaluations are regular and follow an established process, and have resulted in recent improvements to the learning environment.

The centre's appraisal process has been improved to meet the requirements of the Education Council's teaching standards. Teachers have accessed relevant professional development opportunities to improve their practice. Leaders should continue to support teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching, and to gauge the impact that professional development has on children's learning outcomes.

The strategic plan is aligned with the centre annual plan. By setting specific actions and quality indicators teachers would be better placed to evaluate the progress being made towards achieving the centre's strategic aims and goals.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps for the centre include continuing work to:

  • establish sound and shared understandings about the use of Te Whāriki 2017 to strengthen evaluation, assessment and planning and to guide the review of the centre's philosophy

  • build teaching practices that empower children to think creatively and lead their own learning

  • strengthen teachers' implementation of the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi in the programme

  • establish culturally responsive practices with children and families from Māori, Pacific and other cultures.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of St Mary's Family Pre-School completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of St Mary's Family Pre-School will be in three years.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

31 January 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Otahuhu, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25091

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

35 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

27

Gender composition

Girls 17 Boys 10

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Samoan
other Pacific
other ethnic groups

4
4
8
5
6

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:7

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

September 2018

Date of this report

31 January 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

March 2015

Education Review

March 2012

Education Review

September 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.