22 Brougham Street, Addington, Christchurch
View on mapConductive Education Canterbury Inc
Conductive Education Canterbury Inc
Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.
Conductive Education Canterbury Inc - 25/02/2020
1 Evaluation of Conductive Education Canterbury Inc
How well placed is Conductive Education Canterbury Inc to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
Conductive Education Canterbury Inc is very well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
Background
Conductive Education Canterbury Inc provides early intervention programmes within an early childhood education context for children with developmental delays or motor disorders. The service is licensed for 16 children, including six up to two years of age. Learning sessions include specialist therapy, and group and individualised activities, with a focus on holistic care and education.
The centre is governed by a management committee. A manager is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the centre. The staff includes two qualified and certificated teachers, an overseas trained conductor, early intervention teachers, and a speech and language therapist.
The centre philosophy was reviewed earlier in 2019 and covers the four priorities for the work of the centre: family, teaching and learning, inclusion and operational. Core values emphasise the importance of supporting children's learning by developing skills and greater independence in an environment that promotes active exploration and participation in partnership with parents, whānau and children.
Leaders have made very good progress towards achieving the recommendations in the 2016 ERO report. They have used external advisory services to strengthen assessment and planning, appraisal and strategic planning.
The Review Findings
Children are well supported to be independent, confident and motivated learners. Community experiences are well used to extend their awareness of the wider world. Teachers skilfully build each child's confidence in oral language and physical skills. The multi-disciplinary team are responsive to individual interests, strengths and capabilities. They regularly meet to discuss children's learning and development and to plan their next steps. This collaborative teams knowledge and skills ensures successful outcomes for all children.
Assessment, planning and evaluation celebrate children's achievements and progress. Parents' views are actively sought and well used to engage them in their child's learning and engage them in the life of the centre. Learning journals show teachers noticing and recognising interests, abilities and needs. They are intentional in the strategies they use to better support the extension of children's learning. Te Whāriki the early childhood curriculum, is well used in assessment records.
Infants, toddlers and young children enjoy a calm and settled environment where they can make independent choices and have access to a range of resources. Caregiving routines are an important aspect of the centre curriculum and seen as valuable learning opportunities.
Well planned and considered programmes help develop children's confidence and wellbeing as they move into and out of the centre. Families and whānau are an integral part of all transition planning. Teachers maintain close links with other early learning services and local schools, to support children's transitions.
Teachers value the centre community and intentionally celebrate its diversity. They are increasing their understandings of te ao Māori to provide meaningful bicultural experiences for children. Parents and members of the local Māori community share their expertise in tikanga Māori to support teachers' practices.
Strong leadership and a collaborative approach are supporting staff to develop their professional capability and leadership capacity. Effective teacher practice, appraisal and professional development are highly valued and recognised as strategic priorities.
Leaders and teachers have a shared understanding of internal evaluation and are improvement focused. They gather a wide range of information and carefully analyse the data to make improvements that benefit children.
The management committee sets a clear vision for the centre that reflects parents and whanau aspirations and expectations for their children's learning. They are well informed about the day-to-day operation of the centre through regular reporting from the centre manager and teachers.
Key Next Steps
Leaders have identified a well-defined direction for future development. They have undertaken some significant work related to Te Whāriki 2017. This continues as a priority for the service, as part of their focus on continuous improvement.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Conductive Education Canterbury Inc completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
- All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region - Te Tai Tini
25 February 2020
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Christchurch |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
70350 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
16 children, including up to 6 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
26 |
||
Gender composition |
Girls 14, Boys 12 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori NZ European/Pākehā Other ethnic groups |
4 12 10 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:2 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:2 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
November 2019 |
||
Date of this report |
25 February 2020 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) These are available at www.ero.govt.nz |
Education Review |
October 2016 |
|
Education Review |
July 2013 |
||
Education Review |
May 2010 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
-
Very well placed
-
Well placed
-
Requires further development
-
Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Conductive Education Canterbury Inc - 18/10/2016
1 Evaluation of Conductive Education Canterbury Inc
How well placed is Conductive Education Canterbury Inc to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
Conductive Education Canterbury is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
The centre caters for infants, toddlers and young children, including children with developmental delays or disorders or who need early intervention programmes. The children come from a range of cultural backgrounds. Teachers use two well-resourced rooms to meet the different needs of individual children.
The service is governed by a management committee made up of past and present parents and current staff members. The centre manager is responsible for the day-to-day running of the centre.
Teachers and specialists are well qualified in their fields of expertise. The staffing for the centre includes an education conductor, speech and language therapist, two qualified ECE teachers each with an additional graduate diploma in early intervention.
The centre manager and teachers effectively work in partnership with parents to achieve the best outcomes for children.
The centre has made progress in meeting the recommendations of the 2013 ERO report. The strategic plan is more closely aligned with the centre's procedures and the new approach to appraisal is in place. Further work is required to strengthen the quality of the strategic plan and the appraisal process. Teachers model and discuss specific strategies and resources that parents can use at home to support their child's needs.
The Review Findings
Leaders and teachers are welcoming and inclusive of children and their families. Children's wellbeing is caringly nurtured in the environment. Siblings are encouraged to participate in the early childhood programme.
Teachers use a calm, well-paced approach with under two year old children. They sensitively repeat processes for children to allow them to practise their skills and consolidate their learning. They readily adapt programmes and availability of equipment to meet the changing needs of both children and parents.
Music and movement forms the basis of several learning programmes. Conductive goals set for each child support personalised planning decisions. Parents are well informed of their children’s development and progress towards these goals.
Teachers are responsive to the opinions and aspirations of parents and whānau of Māori and Pacific children. They seek specific information that enables them to support the cultural backgrounds of all children and their families.
Leaders have developed a useful process for self review which supports ongoing improvement and considers the impact of changes on outcomes for children. Teachers can further strengthen self review by making the process more evaluative.
Centre leaders and teachers are collaborative and make effective use of staff strengths. Collectively, they have used relevant professional learning and development to enhance their respective roles in the centre. They are responsive to parent and community feedback and report regularly to the management committee.
Key Next Steps
Centre leaders, teachers and ERO agree that the key next steps to improve outcomes for children’s learning include:
-
making learning more visible in assessment and group planning
-
evaluating the effectiveness of learning and teaching strategies
-
strengthening appraisal by improving the consistency of practice and expectations
-
refining the strategic plan to align more closely to the centre philosophy and clearly setting the centre's future direction.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Conductive Education Canterbury Inc completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
-
curriculum
-
premises and facilities
-
health and safety practices
-
governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Conductive Education Canterbury Inc will be in three years.
Lesley Patterson
Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern
18 October 2016
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Christchurch |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
70350 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
16 children, including up to 6 aged under two |
||
Service roll |
22 |
||
Gender composition |
Girls 17; Boys 5 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori Pākehā Tongan |
5 15 2 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+Based on funding rates |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:2 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:7 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
August 2016 |
||
Date of this report |
18 October 2016 |
||
Most recent ERO reports |
Education Review |
July 2013 |
|
Education Review |
May 2010 |
||
Education Review |
March 2007 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.