85 - 87 Johns Road, Rangiora
View on mapLeaps and Bounds Preschool
Leaps and Bounds Preschool
Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.
Leaps and Bounds Preschool - 11/06/2020
1 Evaluation of Leaps and Bounds Preschool
How well placed is Leaps and Bounds Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
Leaps and Bounds Preschool is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Leaps and Bounds Preschool is a privately-owned service, providing all-day care and education in Rangiora. It is licensed for 56 children, including up to eight children under two years of age. Children learn and play in three age-defined learning and care spaces: nursery, foundation and kindergarten. Each area has its own outdoor space.
The service was re-licensed in May 2018 under new ownership, and a new governance and leadership structure was established. Two owners (directors) provide governance, and a centre manager, supported by two head teachers, manages the day-to-day operation and planning for the service. The teaching team has remained relatively consistent over the last nine years. Most of the teachers are qualified and registered, including six who are fully Montessori trained and three who are partly trained.
The service's philosophy includes ideas about respectful relationships, resilience, valuing cultural diversity, respect for Māori as tangata whenua and children as kaitiaki of the environment. The vision states that: 'We will provide a modern Montessori environment driven by our passion to nurture and inspire children to be motivated and independent global citizens.
The November 2016 ERO report identified there was a need for staff to: increase bicultural understandings; develop confidence in self review; improve staff appraisal and strengthen strategic planning. Good progress has been made in some of these areas.
The service is a member of the Puketeraki Kāhui Ako|Community of Learning.
The Review Findings
Teachers and leaders respond thoughtfully to the learning and wellbeing needs of children. They work alongside them to meaningfully promote engagement and respond to their needs and interests.
The learning and play environments for all ages are well-resourced, welcoming and inclusive. Teachers in the Montessori 'classroom' for older children foster independence and promote responsibility. The nursery environment is a calm and unhurried space for under two-year-olds to play and learn.
Transitions into, within and out of the centre are well managed and personalised to meet the needs of children. Well-established relationships with local schools also assist effective transitions.
The importance of home culture for children in their learning and play environment is recognised and valued. There are well established and maintained home-service connections. Aspects of Māori culture are evident in learning spaces and in everyday practices. Understanding and integration of bicultural components in programmes and practices has improved. Very good support is in place to meet the needs of diverse learners. This includes working with whānau to source external support as appropriate.
Relevant professional learning, effective strategic/annual planning and the use of internal evaluation for improvement are driving a positive and collaborative working environment for teachers and leaders. Strategic plans are monitored and evaluated in relation to identified priorities. The development of leadership capability for head teachers is supported by clearly defined roles and responsibilities, as well as appropriate mentoring and coaching.
An internal evaluation framework is in place which links to strategic planning. It is used effectively to guide decisions about change and improvement for the benefit of children and their whānau.
Key Next Steps
The current appraisal process is not sufficiently robust. This is a self-identified area for improvement and an internal evaluation of appraisal is in progress. Any adjustments to appraisal should ensure that it aligns with Teaching Council expectations for a process that 'meaningfully supports' teacher development. The appraisal process needs to attest in relation to each standard in a 12 month period as well as provide formal feedback for teachers against the teaching standards.
Aspects of planning and assessment are inconsistently applied. To further improve outcomes for learners, planning and assessment processes should be monitored to ensure that:
-
language, culture and identity are visible and well-considered in planning and assessment documents and practice
-
bicultural perspectives are actively promoted and present in planning and assessment
-
a localised curriculum (including Māori perspectives) is visible in planning and practice
-
parent voice is included and effective learning partnerships with whānau are promoted.
Internal evaluation could be made more effective by incorporating specific and measurable outcomes for teachers and children in the action planning phase.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Leaps and Bounds Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region - Te Tai Tini
11 June 2020
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Rangiora |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
65015 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
56 children, including up to 8 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
57 |
||
Gender composition |
Female 32, Male 25 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori |
5 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:4 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:8 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
December 2019 |
||
Date of this report |
11 June 2020 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
November 2016 |
|
Education Review |
September 2013 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
-
Very well placed
-
Well placed
-
Requires further development
-
Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Leaps and Bounds Preschool - 08/11/2016
1 Evaluation of Leaps and Bounds Preschool
How well placed is Leaps and Bounds Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
Leaps and Bounds Preschool Rangiora is well placed to promote positive outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Leaps and Bounds Preschool is a privately-owned Early Childhood Centre. It provides education and care for infants, toddlers and preschool children.
The centre operates from two adjacent premises. There are three learning areas and each area has a separate playground to cater for children at various stages of development.
The centre's philosophy integrates a blend of Montessori beliefs and Te Whāriki, the New Zealand Early Childhood Curriculum.
The teaching team is made up of experienced and newly-qualified teachers. Most teachers have, or are currently training to have, an additional qualification in Montessori.
There have been recent changes in the management structure which have brought about a greater clarity of roles and responsibilities.
The recommendations from the 2013 ERO report have been mostly met. The centre owner and the teachers continue to develop bicultural perspectives in the programme and centre self-review, particularly related to the quality of teaching practices.
The centre is part of the Rangiora Learning Cluster.
The Review Findings
Teachers provide children and their families with a warm and welcoming environment. The positive and inclusive relationships between teachers and children, and parents supports children's wellbeing and sense of belonging.
Relationships across the centre are focused on supporting, encouraging and affirming children's ongoing learning and development. Teachers take time to talk with parents about their children’s interests, strengths and abilities. Together they develop shared and purposeful learning goals.
Children have easy access to a wide range of resources and activities that encourage their physical, imaginative and creative play. The programme provides a balance of child and teacher initiated activities. Literacy and mathematics are naturally integrated into learning activities.
Teachers use practices that effectively support and extend children's knowledge, thinking and problem solving skills. There are some very good examples of children's learning and progress over time in learning stories.
Transitions into the centre, and between the nursery and the preschool, are well planned and personalised to meet the needs of individual children and families.
Infants and toddlers benefit from a calm, settled nursery environment. They are well supported by teachers' nurturing and sensitive interactions. Teachers are responsive to the individual needs and preferences of these young children, particularly developing their oral language skills.
Good use is made of individual teacher's skills and professional learning to enhance the programme offered to children. The use of internal evaluation is beginning to contribute to improved outcomes for children.
The managers and leaders have implemented some key guiding documents and processes that are supporting the centre's future direction. These changes have been implemented to ensure a shared understanding of new systems and practices.
Key Next Steps
The centre managers have identified, and ERO agree, that their next steps are to:
- increase the understanding, and integration of bicultural components in programmes and practices
- develop teachers' confidence and use of in-depth self-review of teacher practices and appraisal
- strengthen strategic planning to include clear alignment to the centre's philosophy and practices.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Leaps and Bounds Preschool completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Leaps and Bounds Preschool will be in three years.
Dr Lesley Patterson
Deputy Chief Review Officer Te Waipounamu Southern
8 November 2016
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Rangiora |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
65015 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
56 children, including up to 6 aged under two |
||
Service roll |
57 |
||
Gender composition |
Girls 25; Boys 32 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori Pākehā Other Ethnicities |
5 45 7 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:4 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:10 |
Meets minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
August 2016 |
||
Date of this report |
8 November 2016 |
||
Most recent ERO reports |
Education Review |
September 2013 |
|
Education Review |
June 2010 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.