Titiro Whakamua - Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre

Education institution number:
55419
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
15
Telephone:
Address:

34 Miro Street, Upper Hutt CBD, Upper Hutt

View on map

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Titiro Whakamua - Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre is part of the Hutt Valley teen parent programme at Heretaunga College. An Incorporated Society takes responsibility for governance. Day-to-day management is the responsibility of a newly appointed head teacher. Almost all children enrolled are aged under two.   

Summary of Review Findings

Children experience positive and responsive interactions with teaching staff. Their preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their participation and play. Teachers demonstrate understanding of children’s whānau and life contexts. Positive steps are taken to acknowledge the aspirations held by whānau for their children’s wellbeing and learning. The curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. An annual plan has recently been developed to guide operation over time. Better organisation of aspects of health and safety practice is required.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • development of an emergency management plan that includes all required elements
  • implementation of a suitable hazard management process
  • ensuring the temperature of water delivered from taps that are accessible to children is no higher than 40 degrees Celsius
  • requiring parental approval of adult-to-child ratios for regular excursions at enrolment
  • ensuring that all required parental signatures are obtained for administration of medication by staff to children
  • revising the child protection policy so that it meets all the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.
  • development of an annual plan to guide the service’s operation.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Services 2008; HS7, HS12, HS13, HS17, HS28, HS31, GMA8.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

15 December 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Titiro Whakamua- Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre
Profile Number 55419
Location Upper Hutt

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 25 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

50-79%

Service roll

16

Ethnic composition

Māori 7, NZ European/Pākehā 8, Other ethnic groups 1

Review team on site

November 2021

Date of this report

15 December 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review May 2018; Education Review April 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

1 Evaluation of Titiro Whakamua - Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre

How well placed is Titiro Whakamua - Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Titiro Whakamua - Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre is part of the Hutt Valley Teen Parent programme and is situated in the grounds of Heretaunga College. The centre caters for teenage mothers and their children from Wainuiomata to Kaitoke. Mothers study in an adjoining classroom with easy access to their children.

The service is licensed for 30 children, including 25 up to two years of age. One third of the roll is Māori. At the time of this ERO review seventeen of the twenty children enrolled were aged up to two years. The three age groups, babies, toddlers and over twos, each enjoy their own area of the centre.

The head teacher is responsible for the day-to-day running of the centre. An incorporated society, made up of members from the community and school, governs the centre.

Leaders and teachers have begun to address the areas for development and review identified in the April 2015, ERO report. These included: strengthening strategic planning; self review and appraisal. Progress in these areas continues to be needed.

The Review Findings

The centre philosophy and vision are highly evident in practice. Whanaungatanga underpins centre relationships that are warm and friendly. Babies, infants, toddlers and their mothers are valued and their mana respected. They demonstrate a strong sense of wellbeing and belonging within an inclusive environment.

The holistic development of babies, infants and toddlers is fostered by teachers who know and respect mothers' routines and dreams for their children's future. Teachers recognise and respond appropriately to their interests and physical needs. Attentive adults listen, observe and respond to toddlers' and babies' gestures and expressive body language.

Attractive portfolios provide a rich record of children's learning and time at the centre. Strengths, interests, dispositions, cultural identities and needs are recognised and celebrated. Planning for learning is shared and parent input valued.

Aesthetic natural spaces, indoors and out, stimulate interest and encourage active exploration. Babies and toddlers enjoy freedom of movement in their own areas as they develop a strong sense of self, growing and learning at their own pace.

Te reo me ngā tikanga Māori are highly evident and respected throughout the curriculum and centre environment. Māori children are authentically immersed in their culture. All children are supported to develop a positive understanding of their heritage.

A strong transition process supports both mother and child to settle into the centre and form positive relationships with centre staff. Their needs and circumstances are sensitively considered.

The centre's appraisal policy and processes need to align to Education Council’s expectations and Teacher Standards. The centre has developed an appraisal system based on how teachers meet the key areas identified in the centre's strategic plan. Teachers reflect on and record a range of evidence in their portfolios. These reflections can relate to practising teacher certification, but there is no direct link. Leaders have begun to explore the Education Council’s standards but have not documented how these will be included in teachers’ appraisals.

Annual and strategic plans guide improvements to the centre. ERO identified, and leaders agree, this planning should be strengthened to better guide implementation of planned changes.

Self review is reflective. ERO's evaluation identified, and leaders agree, that they should build their capability and understanding of internal evaluation. This should help them to better understand the impact of their practices and changes on outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

ERO identified the need for leaders and staff to:

  • immediately review the centre’s appraisal system to incorporate Teacher Standards

  • strengthen annual and strategic planning to guide centre developments

  • develop an understanding of internal evaluation in order to enhance teaching and learning and positive outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Titiro Whakamua - Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified an area of non-compliance in the service related to appraisal.

The service provider must ensure that all teachers, including the head teacher, are regularly appraised.
[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA7]

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Titiro Whakamua - Looking Forward Early Childhood Centre will be in three years.

Patricia Davey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

24 May 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Upper Hutt

Ministry of Education profile number

55419

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 25 aged under 2

Service roll

20

Gender composition

Girls 12, Boys 8

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Pacific

7
10
3

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2018

Date of this report

24 May 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

April 2015

Education Review

May 2012

Education Review

February 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.