Aroha Montessori

Education institution number:
55270
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
23
Telephone:
Address:

3 Messines Avenue, Trentham, Upper Hutt

View on map

Aroha Montessori

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama- indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most (PDF 3.01MB) are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. The Akarangi Quality Evaluation Judgement Rubric (PDF 91.30KB) derived from the indicators, is used to inform the ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Aroha Montessori are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

ERO’s judgement

What the service knows about outcomes for learners

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

ERO’s judgement

He Whāriki Motuhake

The learner and their learning

Whakaū Embedding

Whakangungu Ngaio

Collaborative professional learning builds knowledge and capability

Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Aronga Whai Hua

Evaluation for improvement

Whakaū Embedding

Kaihautū

Leaders foster collaboration and improvement

Whakaū Embedding

Te Whakaruruhau

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

Aroha Montessori is a privately-owned early childhood education service. The owner, supported by two qualified kaiako, manages teaching, learning and operations. The philosophy is based on five core values: love/aroha, peace/rangimarie, respect/mauri ora, diversity/tino rangatiratanga, sustainability/kaitiakitanga. Te Whariki, the early childhood curriculum, and the Montessori approach to early education.

3 Summary of findings

A responsive curriculum empowers tamariki and positively enhances their mana as learners. Kaiako actively support tamariki to develop a sense of belonging, independence, confidence and resilience.  Tamariki take responsibility for themselves, others. There is a strong emphasis on environmental education. They confidently engage in learning experiences for sustained periods of time.

Partnerships with parents and whānau are fostered to build tamariki social competence and emotional wellbeing. The valued learning outcomes in Te Whāriki, and teaching strategies to progress learning could be more explicit in planning, assessment and evaluation documentation.

Kaiako work collaboratively to build professional knowledge and skills that enable them to respond meaningfully to children’s interests, and support development of their knowledge and dispositions. They regularly inquire into their practice, making good use of external expertise, current research, and targeted professional development to inform ongoing improvement.

Kaiako practices promote understandings of te ao Māori in ways that are meaningful for all tamariki. There is more work to do to build kaiako cultural competence, particularly in relation to promoting the success of Māori and Pacific learners. Suitable acknowledgement of the cultures and languages of all families is not yet evident in the curriculum.

Tamariki learning and well-being, in the context of whānau and family, are at the heart of decision making. Leadership is strongly focused on improvement. Leaders and kaiako work collaboratively to develop and enact the service’s philosophy, vision and values. The individual skills and strengths of kaiako are highly valued.

A systematic approach to internal evaluation aligns well to strategic priorities. The team has yet to draw on community voice to help inform decisions about ongoing curriculum priorities. They are embedding their understanding and use of internal evaluation.

4 Improvement actions

Aroha Montessori will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning. These are to:

  • show consistently in assessment for learning documentation, the teaching strategies to progress learning and tamariki languages, cultures and identities
  • further develop kaiako cultural competence, in relation to promoting success for Māori and Pacific learners and acknowledgment of mana whenua
  • review priorities for tamariki learning by exploring the learning outcomes in 
    Te Whāriki in collaboration with the learning community  
     
  • embed internal evaluation capability by making better use of evaluative questions and indicators throughout the evaluation process.  

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Aroha Montessori completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

8 November 2021 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name Aroha Montessori
Profile Number 55270
Location Upper Hutt

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

20 children aged over 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

24

Ethnic composition

Māori 3, NZ European/Pākehā 12, Indian 6, Other ethnic groups 3

Review team on site

July 2021

Date of this report

8 November 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, May 2018; Education Review, March 2015

Aroha Montessori - 09/05/2018

1 Evaluation of Aroha Montessori

How well placed is Aroha Montessori to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Aroha Montessori is a privately owned early learning service located in Trentham, Upper Hutt. It is licensed for 20 children aged over two years and operates five days a week. Of the 25 children enrolled, three identify as Māori and one as Pacific.

Since the March 2015 ERO report, a senior teacher has been employed to support the principal, who is the owner. The principal is responsible for day-to-day operation and leads a four-teacher team. All teachers are fully registered and two hold Montessori qualifications.

Aroha Montessori’s philosophy emphasises the importance of: biculturalism; celebrating cultural diversity; caring for the environment; partnerships with parents; preparing for school; and promoting children’s learning, independence and creativity.

The previous ERO report identified areas of practice requiring further development. These included: explicitly linking Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum and the Montessori curriculum to strengthen assessment, planning and evaluation; and improving teaching and learning through the development of appraisal and self-review processes.

The Review Findings

Aroha Montessori's philosophy was recently reviewed with input from families and whānau. It seeks to give effect to both Montessori principles and Te Whāriki. Aligning and strengthening links between this guiding document, the centre’s vision, strategic plan and curriculum is an important next step. This should support the team to better assess, plan and evaluate teaching and learning.

Teachers know the children well. They use a range of effective strategies to support children's participation, focus thinking and extend their understanding. There is a purposeful, settled environment provided for learning and a collective sense of identity and belonging. Children's social competence is promoted and they are consistently supported to be courteous, self-managing and helpful to others.

The structured Montessori programme, mainly implemented in the morning, encourages children to learn through the use of selected resources. Literacy, mathematics and science are successfully woven throughout these sessions. A calm tone supports children’s engagement for sustained periods. They show respect for the environment, each other and their teachers.

The centre is an enviroschool and care for the natural world is strongly promoted. Children enjoy the outdoor play space, interacting with the environment and the opportunities for physical, creative, open-ended play. Increasing the range of resources and opportunities for children to explore, make choices and lead their own learning to better give effect to the principles of Te Whāriki is a next step. The team plans to continue professional learning and development (PLD) about Te Whāriki to strengthen their practice.

Te ao Māori is identified as a valued part of the children's learning experience and aspects are promoted throughout the centre. Te reo Māori is increasingly evident in profile books. Teachers have focused on improving bicultural practices and their use of te reo Māori, supported by extensive PLD. They should continue to develop their understanding of what educational success looks like for Māori and Pacific children.

Teachers' approach to planning for learning continues to require development. Children's profile books are a useful record of their learning experiences and progress through the use of Montessori materials. Recognition of their learning and achievement linked to the outcomes of Te Whāriki should be improved.

A planned review of the team's approach this year should consider:

  • how best to assess children’s interests, strengths and learning dispositions
  • the planning of intentional strategies to promote children’s learning
  • evaluation that informs decisions about next teaching and learning steps
  • ways of integrating Montessori and Te Whāriki assessment processes
  • increased response to children's bicultural and multicultural backgrounds
  • further integration of parents' aspirations and goals for children’s learning.

The development of purposeful, supportive relationships with parents and whānau is given priority. Families' views are sought, valued and used to guide decisions about the learning programme and centre operation. They are well informed about their children's progress. Strengthening families' participation and partnership in their children's learning is an identified next step.

Children with additional needs are well supported by external support agencies, accessed as necessary. A number of parents and children are English language learners. Teachers implement appropriate practices to support communication and encourage friendships.

Well-established relationships with local schools support teachers to plan children's successful transition from the centre. Continuity of learning is promoted through comprehensive reports about children's learning, competencies and progress.

Leaders and teachers are building their understanding and use of internal evaluation. External support has been accessed to strengthen this development. The need to place greater emphasis on the review of priority areas of practice is a recognised next step. Having and effectively using a suitable evaluative framework that includes the use of quality indicators and evidence, is an area for development.

Emergent leadership is encouraged and nurtured. PLD is aligned to improving outcomes for children. A useful framework guides the improvement-focused appraisal process, teacher reflection and inquiry. Further development of appraisal should include observations linked to each teacher's identified goals and evidence that professional requirements are met.

Aspects of governance and management are well developed. Strategic direction is supported by detailed annual plans. Aligning identified outcomes to goals, should enable progress to be better measured and the identification of next steps. Although a range of regularly reviewed operational guidelines are in place, some need further development to enable the consistent implementation of centre and legislative expectations.

Key Next Steps

Leaders and teacher should:

  • continue the integration of Te Whāriki into curriculum and assessment practices to extend opportunities for children to increasingly lead their own learning

  • align the philosophy, strategic plan and annual plan to better identify priorities

  • develop a shared understanding of internal evaluation to enable ongoing improvement.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Aroha Montessori completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Since the on-site phase of the review, the centre has further reviewed its policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Aroha Montessori will be in three years.

Patricia Davey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

9 May 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Upper Hutt

Ministry of Education profile number

55270

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

20 children aged over 2

Service roll

25

Gender composition

Boys 14, Girls 11

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Pacific
Asian
Other ethnic groups

3
14
1
6
1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children:

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2018

Date of this report

9 May 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

March 2015

Education Review

June 2012

Education Review

December 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.