John Walker Drive, Manurewa, Auckland
View on mapFinlayson Park Kindergarten
Finlayson Park Kindergarten - 26/09/2016
Here is the latest report for the Governing Organisation that this service is part of.
1 Evaluation of Finlayson Park Kindergarten
How well placed is Finlayson Park Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed | Requires further development | Well placed | Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Finlayson Park Kindergarten is located adjacent to Finlayson Park School and is licensed for 40 children over two years old. The kindergarten offers six hour sessions that align with school hours. It is part of the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association and operates within the policies and management framework of this organisation. A professional practice manager (PPM) visits regularly and provides leadership and curriculum support for teachers.
There have been several changes in the teaching team since mid-2015. The head teacher is new to the position and two other teachers are also new appointments. The teachers, who are all fully registered, work collaboratively to serve the multicultural community. They celebrate diversity, catering well for children with special needs and those who are new to speaking English.
In 2013 ERO identified several positive features of the service including the quality of relationships, bicultural practices and teaching strategies that challenged children's thinking. These practices continue to be strengths of the kindergarten. Teachers were developing programme planning and assessment strategies. The new team continues to strengthen its effectiveness in these areas. Teachers have also reviewed and developed their teaching philosophy which provides a framework for internal evaluation.
This review was part of a cluster of four kindergarten reviews in the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association.
The Review Findings
Children are enthusiastic learners who show a sense of belonging and feeling safe in the kindergarten. They enjoy positive and respectful relationships with teachers and contribute to conversations about their play. Children play cooperatively in small groups and are learning to persist with difficult tasks and to deepen their thinking. They benefit from the kindergarten focus on sustainable practices and having a connection with the land. They have become keen gardeners, confident cooks and interested explorers as they investigate their neighbourhood.
Teachers skilfully engage children in learning. They have very effective strategies to maintain a calm environment that enables children to focus on purposeful play and respect one another. Teachers foster oral language with meaningful conversations and questions that help to extend children’s ideas. Teachers have a strong commitment to success for all children which is reflected in their thoughtful use of equity funding, their priority focus on children with special needs and their enthusiasm for growing bicultural practices. They have identified the need to develop further their knowledge of their Pacific communities and how the programme can become more responsive to these smaller groups.
Teachers focus the programme on children's individual strengths and interests. They are involved in ongoing professional development to enhance their planning and assessment strategies. Daily team meetings enable teachers to track children's learning efficiently and respond quickly to developing interests. Teachers also reflect each day on the effectiveness of their learning plans. They document children's learning well but have recognised their next step is to improve continuity between learning stories and making their roles in extending learning more visible.
Parents and whānau are interested partners in their children's learning. Teachers actively foster family involvement through a parents’ support group, regular informal discussions and centre events. Attractive displays enable parents and whānau to be well informed about the programme and teaching practices, to share stories from home, and provide teachers with feedback when learning is celebrated in children's portfolios. Parents who were interviewed by ERO appreciate the welcoming, family friendly environment and the positive relationships their children share with teachers. They value how well teachers know their children and respond to their interests and cultural identity.
The kindergarten is well managed. The head teacher is a collaborative leader who distributes responsibilities and values the different skills and knowledge each teacher and support staff member brings to the team. Together staff work effectively to operate the centre and achieve development goals. Effective association support has helped teachers become established as a new team and confidently manage challenges as they arise. They have well established internal evaluation processes that are resulting in very positive outcomes for children.
The Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association continues to support the kindergartens well. Leaders establish overarching long term goals that enable teachers to align their centre development with the strategic direction of the Association. They are responsive to changing community needs and have prepared teachers well to face the challenges of increased competition, the intake of two year olds and providing variable session hours. Leaders continue to adapt personnel systems to meet legislative changes, including a revised appraisal process to help teachers meet certification expectations.
Key Next Steps
The teachers and the PPM agree that the key next steps for the kindergarten’s development should include:
- ongoing development of planning, assessment and evaluation in accordance with their professional development goals
- considering a measurable plan to guide their focus on children's oral language development
- continuing to build relationships with the local community and marae.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Finlayson Park Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Finlayson Park Kindergarten will be in three years.
Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern
26 September 2016
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location | Manurewa, Auckland | ||
Ministry of Education profile number | 5118 | ||
Licence type | Free Kindergarten | ||
Licensed under | Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 | ||
Number licensed for | 40 children, including up to 0 aged under 2 | ||
Service roll | 57 | ||
Gender composition | Boys 31 Girls 26 | ||
Ethnic composition | Māori Pākehā Samoan Tongan Cook Island Māori Cambodian others | 23 3 19 6 2 2 2 | |
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates | 80% + | ||
Reported ratios of staff to children | Over 2 | 1:10 | Meets minimum requirements |
Review team on site | June 2016 | ||
Date of this report | 26 September 2016 | ||
Most recent ERO report(s) | Education Review | February 2013 | |
Education Review | February 2010 | ||
Education Review | June 2005 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Finlayson Park Kindergarten - 18/02/2013
1 Evaluation of the Service
How well placed is the service to promote positive outcomes for children?
Finlayson Kindergarten is very well placed to continue promoting positive outcomes for children.
Context
Finlayson Park Kindergarten is part of the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association (CMKA). The Association’s clear vision sets the direction for the service. Strategies to achieve this vision include responsiveness to whānau contributions and bicultural practices. The Association has a commitment to high quality care and education.
The kindergarten provides five morning and three afternoon sessions. Children attend from the local community and the majority will attend the school next door. Children represent a number of cultures and are aged between two and five years of age.
The kindergarten has had a positive ERO reporting history with the 2010 report affirming high quality programmes. Programmes support children to be capable, confident learners, able to articulate their ideas and thoughts and to work effectively with other children and adults. The kindergarten has three qualified teachers.
This review was conducted as part of a cluster approach to reviews in six early childhood education services within the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association umbrella organisation.
The Review Findings
The Kindergarten is well governed and managed. Professional support for the well qualified team of registered teachers is ongoing and useful. Specific initiatives and personnel in both the Association and the kindergarten promote te reo me ōna tikanga Māori and are strengthening children’s understanding about te ao Māori.
Teachers base the learning programmes on Te Whāriki, the New Zealand early childhood curriculum. Their goals for children are clearly linked to their teaching and learning statement and visible in their practices. Teachers’ teamwork is based on using each other’s strengths to provide the best for children and their community. The reflective culture they have established is having a positive effect on the quality of children’s learning, and their sense of wellbeing and belonging.
Relationships between teachers, children and their families are respectful, and welcoming. Whānau hui are held regularly in the kindergarten and are well attended. Social events at the kindergarten, and excursions with children to which whānau are invited, further cement relationships and contribute to children’s sense of belonging.
Children’s gardens provide a link to children’s home lives, and an opportunity for them to share their knowledge and act as tutors. These opportunities create a sense of children being part of a learning community.
Children are highly independent and make use of all resources and opportunities made available to them. Teachers challenge children’s thinking, and invite them to take learning risks through positive support and encouragement. Children are eager to participate and are proud of their achievements. They are relaxed and trusting, and enjoy tuakana/teina relationships with their peers. The tone in the kindergarten is settled and calm.
Bicultural practices are well established and guide the programme, the choice of resources and the displays in the environment. Professional development has supported teachers’ confidence in integrating Māori ways of knowing, being and doing into the programme for children. They recognise their need to keep building their knowledge in this area.
Teachers also include a strong focus on representing the cultural backgrounds of Pacific, Chinese, Indian and Pākehā children who attend. Highly inclusive practices make provision for children with diverse needs. Teachers successfully model inclusion for children.
The Association’s professional practice manager (PPM) team leads teachers in ongoing reflection on the quality of the kindergarten practices. Teachers recognise the need to continue to develop planning and assessment practices, and deepen self-review processes. They are well positioned to continue developing self review processes that inform their practices.
2 Legal Requirements
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Finlayson Park Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
3 Next Review
When is ERO likely to review the early childhood service again?
ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.
Dale Bailey
National Manager Review Services
Northern Region
18 February 2013
Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Manurewa, Auckland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
5118 |
||
Licence type |
Sessional Free Kindergarten |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
42 children, including up to 0 aged under 2 years |
||
Service roll |
79 |
||
Gender composition |
Boys 48 Girls 31 |
||
Ethnic composition |
NZ European/Pākehā Māori Samoan Tongan Cook Island Māori Other |
34 21 13 5 4 2 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80% |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
No children under 2 |
Choose an item. |
Over 2 |
1:15 |
Meets minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
November 2012 |
||
Date of this report |
18 February 2013 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review Education Review Accountability Review |
February 2010 June 2005 April 2001 |
General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
About ERO Reviews
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the New Zealand government department that reviews schools and early childhood services throughout New Zealand.
Review focus
ERO's education reviews in early childhood services focus on the factors that contribute to positive learning outcomes for children. ERO evaluates how well placed the service is to make and sustain improvements for the benefit of all children at the service. To reach these findings ERO considers:
- Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
- Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
- Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
- Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of self review and partnerships with parents and whānau.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews do not cover every aspect of service performance and each ERO report may cover different issues. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.