31 McKay Cresent, Dargaville
View on mapSelwyn Park Kindergarten
Selwyn Park Kindergarten - 13/10/2016
Here is the latest report for the Governing Organisation that this service is part of.
1 Evaluation of Selwyn Park Kindergarten
How well placed is Selwyn Park Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed | Requires further development | Well placed | Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Selwyn Park Kindergarten in Dargaville is part of the Northland Kindergarten Association (NKA), which provides a governance and management framework to support its operation.
The kindergarten is licensed for 30 children over the age of two years. The children come from a wide area, some travelling significant distances to get to the kindergarten. The majority of the children attending the kindergarten are Māori. There is also a small number of Tongan children.
The kindergarten provides six hour sessions for children, with some attending just a few days in the week. The permanent staff of three qualified teachers are supported by an additional part-time teacher who covers lunch breaks.
Teachers have a shared philosophy statement that shows their commitment to establishing close relationships with children and whānau. The philosophy acknowledges Te Tiriti o Waitangi and notes that children's emerging interests are the trigger for te reo Māori programme developments.
ERO's 2012 report identified that children were competent, independent learners who facilitated their own play. The report noted that positive, respectful relationships with whānau were a feature. In addition, the centre's welcoming and inclusive atmosphere was affirmed, and children's understanding and use of te reo Māori was seen as a real strength. The report recommended strengthening planning processes, improving support for children's transition to school and adding complexity to children's learning. All of these areas have been addressed.
This review was part of a cluster of eight kindergarten reviews in the Northland Kindergarten Association.
The Review Findings
Teachers' interaction with children are supportive, sensitive and respectful. A welcoming and inclusive start to the day enables children to settle quickly and gain confidence as participants in the programme. The curriculum is carefully planned for the strengths, interests and needs of children. Teachers continue to offer good opportunities for children to lead their own learning.
Teachers consistently work to establish and maintain positive relationships and close partnerships with whānau. This encourages a sense of wellbeing and belonging for all. Whānau are confident to talk with teachers and contribute to programmes.
Teachers have established a secure environment for children and whānau where they can use their home languages and share aspects of their cultural backgrounds. Teachers continue to seek ways for children to retain and strengthen their sense of cultural identity. They recognise whakapapa as important to the development of a sense of belonging and connectedness. Children confidently share their obvious familiarity with te reo Māori and also Tongan.
Children have many opportunities to take leadership roles and share their ideas and thinking. Changes to the environment have been discussed with, and sometimes planned by children to meet their own needs. Teachers follow a 'loose parts' philosophy in the high quality environments. This means that there are many items that children are able to use flexibly as they create their play. This way of working encourages children to design challenges and engage in vigorous 'safe' risks as they play.
Children are learning to communicate for a variety of purposes. Teachers support children's oral language development well and prompt children to solve problems independently. They also encourage and support children's interest in literacy, mathematical concepts and science.
Children are very well supported to start school. Successful approaches include a 'buddy' system established by a local school. This 'buddy' relationship starts at kindergarten and continues once the child starts school.
Children each have a portfolio that records their time in the kindergarten and contains learning stories about their interests, strengths and progress. The stories include children's and teachers' contributions. They also demonstrate the ways that teachers recognise and act on information about children shared by their whānau. This assessment information is used to plan the programme so that children's interests guide teachers' practices.
Teachers have established good processes for internal evaluation that leads to improvement. These processes help them to monitor progress towards strategic goals. The Association's governance practices are effective. Its long-term direction continues to focus on continually improving learning outcomes for children. Positive strategies include:
- very good support and guidance by Association personnel, especially in the development of culturally responsive practices and the integration of te ao Māori in ways that are meaningful for children
- new teacher appraisal systems, and professional learning that focus more closely on improving team skills, knowledge and practice and more distributed leadership practices
- regular head teacher meetings that provide opportunities for collegial discussion and support.
Key Next Steps
Managers and teachers agree that the next step in the kindergarten are to:
- increase the visibility in programme records of the principles, goals and strands of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum
- include more about their approaches to cultural responsiveness in their philosophy statement
- more regularly include the parents' comments in children's portfolios.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Selwyn Park Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Selwyn Park Kindergarten will be in four years.
Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern
13 October 2016
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location | Dargaville, Northland | ||
Ministry of Education profile number | 5009 | ||
Licence type | Free Kindergarten | ||
Licensed under | Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 | ||
Number licensed for | 30 children, including up to 0 aged under 2 | ||
Service roll | 32 | ||
Gender composition | Boys 21 Girls 11 | ||
Ethnic composition | Māori Pākehā Tongan Fijian | 24 3 4 1 | |
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates | 80% + | ||
Reported ratios of staff to children | Over 2 | 1:10 | Meets minimum requirements |
Review team on site | August 2016 | ||
Date of this report | 13 October 2016 | ||
Most recent ERO report(s)
| Education Review | June 2012 | |
Education Review | April 2009 | ||
Education Review | February 2006 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Selwyn Park Kindergarten - 19/06/2012
1 The Education Review Office (ERO) Evaluation
Selwyn Park Kindergarten operates as part of the Northland Kindergarten Association (NKA). The kindergarten caters for up to 30 children and offers four school-day sessions and one half-day session for children from Dargaville and the surrounding areas. NKA support staff have worked consistently with staff since the 2009 ERO report to upgrade the indoor and outdoor learning environments. The centre is now an attractive and functional place for children’s learning.
A professional practice manager (PPM) from NKA, provides professional support and advice to staff to encourage the development of high quality teaching and learning programmes and effective administration systems. The head teacher, who was new at the time of the 2009 review, has settled well into her role. NKA has provided her with professional training to continue to develop the skills needed to lead the staff team.
There is a high number of Māori children enrolled at the kindergarten. Children from Pākehā, Pacific and Asian backgrounds also attend. Children are very settled and engaged in the programme. They show high levels of independence and are articulate communicators. Children display developing levels of social competence.
Teachers have developed inclusive relationships with whānau. Māori language, tikanga and beliefs are highly valued within daily kindergarten practice. Children and teachers interact freely with each other as do parents and teachers. Teachers provide support to parents that is appropriate and relevant to individual family circumstances.
Staff work well as a team. The administrator fulfils her role efficiently and provides valuable support to the teaching team. Teachers have reorganised learning environments to make resources more accessible to children, encourage their independent exploration, and to help them to follow their particular learning interests. Teachers consider how they can further extend children’s learning. They reflect on their teaching practice and engage in professional discussions based on current theories and research.
ERO recommends that teachers now review and refine curriculum planning practices to add complexity to children’s learning.
Future Action
ERO is likely to review the centre again in three years.
2 Review Priorities
The Focus of the Review
Before the review, the management of Selwyn Park Kindergarten was invited to consider its priorities for review using guidelines and resources provided by ERO. ERO also used documentation provided by the centre to contribute to the scope of the review.
The detailed priorities for review were then determined following a discussion between the ERO review team and the management and staff. This discussion focused on existing information held by the centre (including self-review information) and the extent to which potential issues for review contributed to positive outcomes for children atSelwyn Park Kindergarten.
All ERO education reviews in early childhood focus on the quality of education. For ERO this includes the quality of:
- the programme provided for children
- the learning environment
- the interactions between children and adults.
ERO’s findings in these areas are set out below.
The Quality of Education
Background
At the time of the 2009 ERO report, the kindergarten had just begun providing longer sessions for four days of the week and retained one half-day session per week. Increased numbers of staff improved opportunities for teachers to work more closely with whānau and children.
Areas of strength
Competent children. Children are independent learners who capably facilitate their own play. Their ability to negotiate positive outcomes, compromise and manage their relationships with other children, is evident. They interact confidently with adults and have developed firm friendships with their peers. Children are respectful and display a strong sense of responsibility for the care of one another and the learning environment.
Positive relationships between whānau and staff. Teachers provide a welcoming and inclusive atmosphere for children and their whānau. Relationships are trusting and respectful. Children, parents and teachers communicate with one another openly. Parents’ aspirations for their children are noted by teachers and are incorporated in to planning.
Teaching practice. Teachers have built sound relationships with the kindergarten’s community. They engage in conversations frequently with children and use resources to prompt thinking. They stimulate children’s learning by asking openended questions, and promote children’s ability to reason and solve problems. Teachers are responsive to new ideas and are open to learning new skills.
Tikanga and te reo Māori. Children are continuously developing a deepening competency in the use and understanding of te reo and tikanga Māori. Children greet their friends and teachers in the Māori language and mihi to visitors. Parents like the fact that their children are learning to speak in both the Māori and English languages. Children are beginning to display the ability to translate phrases, words and numbers spontaneously between languages. Teachers model manākitanga (hospitality), whakawhāungatanga (building family connections) and te reo for children.
Self review. Teachers use self-review procedures effectively to bring about improvement. Where needed, they introduce theoretical foundations and research articles to guide positive change. They have produced effective annual and strategic planning which is used to identify areas for improvement.
Areas for development and review
Add complexity to the quality of learning. Teachers should add complexity to learning by:
- reading more frequently to children and providing opportunities for children to participate in small group discussions
- researching with children and demonstrating how they can use science resources to increase their knowledge about the scientific world
- reviewing the learning environment to ensure children experience a broad range of areas of play.
Partnerships with whānau. Teachers could consider working with whānau to develop a shared understanding of how children learn and the role of family in supporting that learning. They could also better support children’s move into the school environment by strengthening transition to school procedures.
Curriculum planning. Teachers could consider:
- the benefits of using different types of record keeping to support planning for learning
- adding parent and child voice to curriculum planning processes
- identifying what the necessary components of learning stories are for assessing and planning possible next steps for learning
- ensuring that planning demonstrates linked progressions of children’s learning.
Philosophy. Teachers should review the kindergarten’s philosophy and add indicators of good practice to define focus areas identified within the philosophy statement.
Improvement to self review. Teachers could revisit the Ministry of Education selfreview guidelines to help them consider ways to document reviews more precisely.
3 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff of Selwyn Park Kindergarten completed an ERO CentreManagementAssurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they have attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- administration
- health, safety and welfare
- personnel management
- financial and property management.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s documentation, including policies, procedures and records of recent use of procedures. ERO also checked elements of the following areas that have a potentially high impact on outcomes for children:
- emotional safety (including behaviour management, prevention of bullying and abuse)
- physical safety (including behaviour management, sleeping and supervision practices; accidents and medication; hygiene and routines; travel and excursion policies and procedures)
- staff qualifications and organisation
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
In order to improve current practice the managers should:
- display and analyse the hazard list
- analyse accident documentation.
4 Recommendation
ERO, teachers and the professional practice manager agree that teachers should review and refine curriculum planning practices to add complexity to and extend children’s learning.
5 Future Action
ERO is likely to review the centre again in three years.
Makere Smith
National Manager Review Services
Northern Region (Acting)
About the Centre
Type |
All Day Free Kindergarten |
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Centres) Regulations 1998 |
Number licensed for |
30 children over 2 years of age |
Roll number |
35 |
Gender composition |
Girls 20 Boys 15 |
Ethnic composition |
Māori 23, NZ European/Pākehā 8, Tongan 2, Cook Island Māori 1, South East Asian 1 |
Review team on site |
May 2012 |
Date of this report |
19 June 2012 |
Previous three ERO reports |
Education Review, April 2009 Education Review, February 2006 Education Review, December 2002 |
19 June 2012
To the Parents and Community of Selwyn Park Kindergarten
These are the findings of the Education Review Office’s latest report on Selwyn Park Kindergarten.
Selwyn Park Kindergarten operates as part of the Northland Kindergarten Association (NKA). The kindergarten caters for up to 30 children and offers four school-day sessions and one half-day session for children from Dargaville and the surrounding areas. NKA support staff have worked consistently with staff since the 2009 ERO report to upgrade the indoor and outdoor learning environments. The centre is now an attractive and functional place for children’s learning.
A professional practice manager (PPM) from NKA, provides professional support and advice to staff to encourage the development of high quality teaching and learning programmes and effective administration systems. The head teacher, who was new at the time of the 2009 review, has settled well into her role. NKA has provided her with professional training to continue to develop the skills needed to lead the staff team.
There is a high number of Māori children enrolled at the kindergarten. Children from Pākehā, Pacific and Asian backgrounds also attend. Children are very settled and engaged in the programme. They show high levels of independence and are articulate communicators. Children display developing levels of social competence.
Teachers have developed inclusive relationships with whānau. Māori language, tikanga and beliefs are highly valued within daily kindergarten practice. Children and teachers interact freely with each other as do parents and teachers. Teachers provide support to parents that is appropriate and relevant to individual family circumstances.
Staff work well as a team. The administrator fulfils her role efficiently and provides valuable support to the teaching team. Teachers have reorganised learning environments to make resources more accessible to children, encourage their independent exploration, and to help them to follow their particular learning interests. Teachers consider how they can further extend children’s learning. They reflect on their teaching practice and engage in professional discussions based on current theories and research.
ERO recommends that teachers now review and refine curriculum planning practices to add complexity to children’s learning.
Future Action
ERO is likely to review the centre again in three years.
When ERO has reviewed an early childhood centre we encourage management to inform their community of any follow up action they plan to take. You should talk to the management or contact person if you have any questions about this evaluation, the full ERO report or their future intentions.
If you would like a copy of the full report, please contact the centre or see the ERO website, http://www.ero.govt.nz.
Makere Smith
National Manager Review Services
Northern Region (Acting)
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT REVIEWS
About ERO
ERO is an independent, external evaluation agency that undertakes reviews of schools and early childhood services throughout New Zealand.
About ERO Reviews
ERO follows a set of standard procedures to conduct reviews. The purpose of each review is to:
- improve quality of education for children in early childhood centres; and
- provide information to parents, communities and the Government.
Reviews are intended to focus on outcomes for children and build on each centre’s self review.
Review Focus
ERO’s framework for reviewing and reporting is based on four review strands.
- Quality of Education – including the quality of the programme provided for children, the quality of the learning environment and the quality of the interactions between staff and children and how these impact on outcomes for children.
- Additional Review Priorities – other aspects of the operation of a centre, may be included in the review. ERO will not include this strand in all reviews.
- Compliance with Legal Requirements – assurance that this centre has taken all reasonable steps to meet legal requirements.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews do not cover every aspect of centre performance and each ERO report may cover different issues. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to this centre.
Review Recommendations
Most ERO reports include recommendations for improvement. A recommendation on a particular issue does not necessarily mean that a centre is performing poorly in relation to that issue. There is no direct link between the number of recommendations in this report and the overall performance of this centre.