Funhouse Learning Centre

Education institution number:
50021
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
59
Telephone:
Address:

254 St Hill Street, Whanganui

View on map

Funhouse Learning Centre

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama- indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most (PDF 3.01MB) are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. The Akarangi Quality Evaluation Judgement Rubric (PDF 91.30KB) derived from the indicators, is used to inform the ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Funhouse Learning Centre are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

ERO’s judgement

What the service knows about outcomes for learners

Whakawhanake Sustaining

Ngā Akatoro Domains

ERO’s judgement

He Whāriki Motuhake

The learner and their learning

Whakawhanake Sustaining

Whakangungu Ngaio

Collaborative professional learning builds knowledge and capability

Whakawhanake Sustaining

Ngā Aronga Whai Hua

Evaluation for improvement

Whakawhanake Sustaining

Kaihautū

Leaders foster collaboration and improvement

Whakawhanake Sustaining

Te Whakaruruhau

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

Funhouse Learning Centre is a privately owned service located in the Whanganui CBD. Managers and team leaders guide day-to-day operations and the programme. The service philosophy highlights and reflects whanaungatanga and relationships at the heart of care and education of children. Key next steps from the 2017 ERO report have been progressed.

3 Summary of findings

Children’s emotional wellbeing and social confidence is upheld through respectful and reciprocal relationships that underpin children, parent and community interactions. Leaders and teachers collaborate to develop and progress the service’s philosophy, vision, goals and priorities. Children are confident, capable learners.

Children’s communication and exploration is purposefully enhanced through the indoor and outdoor, natural and well-resourced setting. Learners’ experiences encourage respect for themselves, others and their environment. Teachers intentionally and effectively work alongside children to progress their thinking and ideas. Children lead their own learning, demonstrating their rangatiratanga and independence in engaged, sustained play.

Te ao Māori is meaningfully woven through relationships, the environment, centre practices and programme. Authentic learning experiences include te reo me ngā tikanga Māori. Language interactions offer children conversations about ngā atua, Whanganui narratives, waiata, native plants and rakau within a holistic learning environment. Equity for all children is supported.

Assessment of children’s progress effectively acknowledges their individual learning journeys, enhances their mana and their learner identities. The learning outcomes in Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and the service priorities are the foundation for celebrating and acknowledging children’s learning progression over time.

Leaders’ and teachers’ cohesive, collaborative approach promotes positive learning outcomes for children. Professional knowledge and learning are modelled and implemented to ensure children experience ways of knowing, doing and being that resonate manaakitanga, whanaungatanga, taha tinana and taha hinengaro.

A range of internal evaluation approaches by leaders and teachers is resulting in positive learning outcomes for children. Relational trust between teachers supports purposeful engagement to sustain and improve this quality of service provision. The curriculum focus is deepening leaders’ and teachers’ practices. Children experience sustained learning in an improvement focused environment.

4 Improvement actions

Funhouse Learning Centre will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • continue to enhance the curriculum to reflect the history protocols and legends of the local area.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Funhouse Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non -compliance:

  • evidence of parental acknowledgement of administered medication [HS28].

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

4 October 2021 

7 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Funhouse Learning Centre

Profile Number

50021

Location

Whanganui

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 20 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

64

Ethnic composition

Māori 16, NZ European/Pākehā 43, Other ethnic groups 5.

Review team on site

June 2021

Date of this report

4 October 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, May 2018; Education Review, February 2016.

Funhouse Learning Centre - 23/05/2018

1 Evaluation of Funhouse Learning Centre

How well placed is Funhouse Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Funhouse Learning Centre is a privately owned early childhood education and care facility close to the Whanganui business centre. It is licensed to cater for up to 50 children, including 20 children up to two years. Day-to-day management of education and care is the responsibility of the centre manager.

The philosophy is underpinned by the centre's mission to provide ‘your child’s home away from home’.

The February 2016 ERO report identified key next steps that included: appraisal, leadership and internal evaluation. The centre has received targeted support through a Ministry of Education programme, Strengthening Early Learning Opportunities (SELO). The centre has made significant progress in addressing these areas, and continues to strengthen the key next steps identified in the previous ERO report.

The Review Findings

Teachers know children and their families well. They use this knowledge to provide appropriate support to assist and extend children’s learning.

Children confidently participate in a curriculum that is increasingly responsive to their interests and ideas. They benefit from positive interactions with respectful and attentive teachers. Children are well supported to lead their own learning through a wide range of opportunities and activities.

Significant progress has been made in assessment, planning and evaluation for children's ongoing learning. Parent and whānau aspirations are actively sought and inform planning for children. Individual planning contributes to consistent teaching practice.

Assessment, through profiles, appropriately records children's learning experiences, progress and extension of children's learning over time. Learning stories show clear links to individual plans.

Infants and toddlers are very well supported through consistent, responsive teaching. They have easy access to resources and freely explore learning spaces according to their preferences. Teachers respect children's rights and inform them about decisions that affect them.

Well considered, flexible processes support children and their families' transition into and through the centre. This promotes a sense of belonging for children.

Roles and responsibilities have been established that define clear direction for operation. Managers work collaboratively with teachers and support growing emergent leadership.

Professional learning has supported leaders and teachers to continue to develop and increase their understanding and use of internal evaluation for improvement.

Managers have determined strategic priorities and goals, linked to the centre philosophy. The annual plan outlines ongoing actions over the year for centre practice and operation.

The reviewed appraisal process has been well implemented and is a sound framework to support teachers and managers to develop their practice. The process has been recently reviewed to reflect the Standards for the Teaching Profession.

Key Next Steps

Centre managers have identified, and ERO's evaluation confirms, that appropriate next steps are to continue to:

  • enhance the curriculum through developing the environment in line with the centre's philosophy

  • focus on bicultural growth and development to improve the centre's provision to support Māori children to achieve success as Māori

  • review centre goals with staff and together define high quality practice at this centre.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Funhouse Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Funhouse Learning Centre will be in three years.

Patricia Davey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

23 May 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Whanganui

Ministry of Education profile number

50021

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Service roll

68

Gender composition

Girls 34, Boys 34

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnic groups

20
43
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2018

Date of this report

23 May 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

February 2016

Education Review

February 2013

Education Review

October 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.