Co Kids

Education institution number:
47031
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
52
Telephone:
Address:

301 Lincoln Road, 1, Henderson, Auckland

View on map

Co Kids

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for Co Kids are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing

Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

Co Kids is one of three privately owned services under the shared governance of four directors. A qualified centre manager is responsible for daily operations. She is supported by a second in charge, a curriculum leader and three room leaders. The service’s roll is ethnically diverse. Twenty percent of children attending have Māori heritage.

3 Summary of findings

Children are well supported to develop their confidence and social competence. They include others in their play and relate well to their peers. Teachers are responsive to children’s needs, recognising both the verbal and non-verbal cues of infants. As a result, children develop a sense of belonging within a calm and unhurried environment.

Children are provided with some opportunities to engage with te reo Māori and tikanga Māori in meaningful contexts. A centre-wide internal evaluation, which focuses on strengthening teaching practice to support Māori learners, is currently enabling the team to further develop their bicultural practices.  Leaders acknowledge that they now need to strengthen the monitoring of change to know how actions are leading to improvement.

Service leaders and teachers have established relationships with parents and whānau. The information shared has been used to inform the set-up of the learning environment and children’s assessment documentation. These are reflective of individual children’s home languages and cultures. Service leaders work well with parents and external agencies to support children with additional learning needs.

A new system for curriculum planning has recently been developed which focuses on the individual learner. Leaders acknowledge the need to further strengthen this through a more intentional use of the learning outcomes from Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

Leaders support teachers with some opportunities to engage in ongoing professional development. They now recognise that this could be further strengthened to increase the collective capabilities within the team through links to the professional growth cycle.

4 Improvement actions

Co Kids will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Gain a deeper understanding of Te Whāriki and the use of the learning outcomes to measure children’s learning progression over time.
  • Continue to strengthen processes for teacher appraisal using a professional growth cycle to grow the collective understandings of the teaching team.
  • Strengthen the monitoring of internal evaluation to understand how action is leading to improvement.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Co Kids completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Action for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance:

  • Having a documented safety checking procedure that meets the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.
    Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA7A.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

7 March 2024 

7 Information about the Service 

Early Childhood Service NameCo Kids
Profile Number 47031
LocationHenderson, Auckland
Service type Education and care service
Number licensed for 98 children, including up to 30 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 80-99%
Service roll81
Review team on siteDecember 2023 
Date of this report7 March 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Akanuku | Assurance Review, December 2021; Education Review, April 2018

 

Co Kids

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Co Kids opened in 2016. It is licensed for 98 children, including 30 children under two years of age. The centre provides a full-day programme in a purpose-built facility. Children are grouped according to age. The centre’s community includes small groups of Māori and Pacific children and an increasing number of children from other diverse cultural backgrounds.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Regular opportunities both formal and informal are provided for parents to be involved in decision making concerning their child’s learning.

The service curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. It is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation that demonstrates an understanding of children’s learning, interests, whānau and life contexts.

Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring furniture and items intended for children to sleep on such as stretchers that will be used by more than one child over time, are securely covered with or made of a non-porous material (PF30).
  • Maintaining sufficient spaces for equipment and material to be stored safely and can be easily and safely accessed by adults and where practicable by children (PF8).
  • Ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage are secured (HS6).
  • Maintaining a record of excursions that includes adult:child ratios, evidence of parental permission and approval of adult:child ratios and the signature of the person responsible for giving approval for the excursion to take place (HS17).
  • Documenting a written Child Protection Policy that meets the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014 (HS31).
  • Implementing suitable human resource management practices (GMA7).
  • Ensuring all children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014 (GMA7A).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

7 December 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameCo Kids
Profile Number47031
LocationHenderson, West Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for98 children, including up to 30 aged under 2.
Percentage of qualified teachers80-99%
Service roll76
Ethnic compositionMāori 7, NZ European/Pākehā 23, Asian 31, Pacific 11, other ethnic groups 4
Review team on siteMay 2021
Date of this report7 December 2021
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, April 2018

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Co Kids - 06/04/2018

1 Evaluation of Co Kids

How well placed is Co Kids to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Co Kids in Henderson opened in 2016. It is licensed for 98 children, including 30 children under 2 years of age. The centre provides a full-day programme in a purpose-built facility. Children learn in two age-related areas. The older children's space has recently been established. The centre's community includes small groups of Māori and Pacific children, and an increasing number from diverse ethnic backgrounds.

The centre's philosophy and vision promote a welcoming learning environment, and focus on respectful education and care practices. The philosophy is closely aligned to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, the Reggio philosophy, and the RIE (Resources for Infant Educarers).

The centre manager works with a head teacher and a team of teachers, most of whom are qualified teachers. The centre also employs a cook.

The Review Findings

Infants and toddlers play in a calm, well-resourced and attractive environment. There is a warm, inclusive culture in the centre. Teachers' caring interactions promote children's wellbeing and foster a sense of belonging. Transitions and routines are unhurried. Teachers' respectful care nurtures toddlers' self-help skills, fosters their independence, and reflects the RIE philosophy. Teachers respond to infants' communication cues. They model oral language and give children time to respond.

The older children are supported to be confident learners. They are articulate and social, playing independently or joining small groups. Teachers engage children in conversation and encourage them to make their own choices. Landscaped outdoor spaces offer opportunities for exploration and play. They benefit from opportunities to learn about literacy and numeracy. Teachers could now consider ways to promote challenge and inquiry for older children.

Parents have good opportunities to communicate with teachers, and be informed about what is happening in the centre. Transitions between home and centre and within the centre are flexible and responsive to the needs of each child. Teachers acknowledge children's cultures. They respond well to the challenge of establishing effective communications with the increasingly diverse community.

Bicultural perspectives are respected, integrated into learning experiences, and evident in the environment. Teachers are building their knowledge and understanding of te ao Māori and te reo me ōna tikanga Māori. They include words and phrases in te reo Māori with the children.

Programme planning and assessment practices focus on children's individual and group interests. Portfolios provide an attractive record of learning and children's milestones. An online tool records and informs parents about their children's learning progress. Parents can access and contribute to these records to share with the wider family. This practice could now be established for older children.

Internal evaluation has been effective in promoting change. There is a clear focus on ongoing improvement. Continuing to focus evaluation questions on teaching practice and outcomes for children will help to build teachers' reflective and evaluative thinking.

The leadership team has high expectations of staff as professionals. These expectations include a commitment by staff to their own professional learning. A strong team culture is being established. The centre continues to strengthen its appraisal system, which encourages teachers to reflect on their teaching practice.

The team of experienced directors guides centre operations. The directors have a clear vision and have established a sound strategic direction. Their focus is to ensure the sustainability of the centre in a growing early childhood community. Comprehensive policies and procedures guide professional practice in the centre.

Key Next Steps

Managers agree that next steps include:

  • identifying ways to increase challenges in the programme, and the complexity of play for older children
  • being more intentional in recognising and responding to opportunities to extend children's learning
  • focusing internal evaluation on strengthening the curriculum and learning outcomes for children
  • continuing to refine the appraisal process to focus on teacher's individual inquiry questions.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Co Kids completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Co Kids will be in three years.

Julie Foley
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

6 April 2018 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

LocationHenderson, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number47031
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for98 children, including up to 30 aged under 2
Service roll72
Gender compositionBoys      44
Girls       28
Ethnic compositionPākehā
Chinese
Indian
Samoan
other
37
12
  6
  3
14
Percentage of qualified teachers80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:8Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteJanuary 2018
Date of this report6 April 2018
Most recent ERO report(s)No previous ERO reports

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.