28 Shamrock Street, Palmerston North
View on mapGood Beginnings Early Learning Centre
Good Beginnings Early Learning Centre
Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.
Good Beginnings Early Learning Centre
ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.
ERO’s Judgement
Regulatory standards |
ERO’s judgement |
Curriculum |
Meeting |
Premises and facilities |
Meeting |
Health and safety |
Meeting |
Governance, management and administration |
Meeting |
At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.
Background
Good Beginnings Early Learning Centre is privately owned. Previously known as Little Ferns Childcare, new owners began operating in May 2021. Children learn within a mixed age setting. A centre manager is responsible for governance and management. The head teacher is responsible for day-to-day operations and the curriculum.
Summary of Review Findings
Infants, toddlers, and young children engage in meaningful and positive relationships with teachers. They engage in a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development.
Children experience a curriculum that is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation. Teachers demonstrate an understanding of children’s interests, whānau and life contexts.
Children’s preferences are respected and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences as confident, competent learners. A philosophy statement guides the service’s operation.
Key Next Steps
Next steps include:
-
strengthen the extent to which information documented about children’s learning reflects their identity, language and culture.
Next ERO Review
The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.
Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui
18 July 2022
Information About the Service
Early Childhood Service Name |
Good Beginnings Early Learning Centre |
Profile Number |
46891 |
Location |
Palmerston North |
Service type |
Education and care service |
Number licensed for |
30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2 |
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80-99% |
Service roll |
33 |
Ethnic composition |
Māori 11, NZ European/Pākehā 16, Other ethnic groups 6 |
Review team on site |
May 2022 |
Date of this report |
18 July 2022 |
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Akanuku | Assurance Review, June 2019; Education Review, January 2018 |
General Information about Assurance Reviews
All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.
Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.
ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:
-
having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
-
previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
-
that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
-
that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
-
where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. https://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Centre-Assurance-Statement-Master-January-2017.pdf. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
-
curriculum
-
premises and facilities
-
health and safety practices
-
governance, management and administration.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:
-
discussions with those involved in the service
-
consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
-
observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.
Little Ferns Childcare - 10/06/2019
ERO’s judgement
Regulatory standards |
|
Curriculum |
Meeting |
Premises and facilities |
Meeting |
Health and safety |
Meeting |
Governance, management and administration |
Meeting |
At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.
Background
The owner/manager of this privately-owned service oversees daily operation and leads a team of four qualified teachers, one in training and a support teacher. All teachers are new to the service since the January 2018 ERO report that identified further development was required. Sufficient progress has been made in response.
Summary of review findings
The curriculum is consistent with Te Whāriki. It is inclusive and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. It provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities. The quantity and variety of resources and equipment are appropriate for the learning and abilities of the children attending.
Health and safety systems are monitored. Parents and whānau are consulted about their child’s learning, as well as service operation.
The service is appropriately governed and managed. Professional learning and development and an ongoing process of self review supports teachers to improve the quality of education and care for children attending the service.
Next ERO Review
The next ERO review is likely to be an Education Review.
Phillip Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services
Central Region
10 June 2019
Information about the service
Early Childhood Service Name |
Little Ferns Childcare |
||
Profile Number |
46891 |
||
Location |
Palmerston North |
||
Service type |
Education and care service |
||
Number licensed for |
30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2 |
||
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:4 – Better than regulatory standards |
|
Over 2 |
1:6 – Better than regulatory standards |
||
Service roll |
34 |
||
Gender composition |
Girls 22, Boys 12 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori 14 |
||
Review team on site |
May 2019 |
||
Date of this report |
10 June 2019 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
January 2018 |
General Information about Assurance Reviews
All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include:
-
the Licensing Criteria for Home-based Education and Care Services 2008
-
the Licensing Criteria for Hospital-based Education and Care Services 2008.
Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.
ERO undertakes an Assurance Review process in any service:
-
having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
-
previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
-
that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
-
that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
-
where an Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
-
curriculum
-
premises and facilities
-
health and safety practices
-
governance, management and administration.
As part of an Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
As part of an Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:
-
discussions with those involved in the service
-
consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
-
observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.