Back2Nature - Koru

Education institution number:
46649
Service type:
Homebased Network
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
77
Telephone:
Address:

31 Ogle Crescent, Kamo, Whangarei

View on map

Back2Nature Koru

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Back2Nature Koru are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 

Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing
Whakatō Emerging

2 Context of the Service

Back2Nature Koru is one of two homebased education and care networks. The owner is the service leader and is supported by a team of three qualified mentoring teachers and two administrators. Children attending reflect the ethnically diverse cultures within the community.

3 Summary of findings

Responsive and respectful relationships between mentoring teachers, educators, children and their families are a strength of the service. Children’s emotional wellbeing and their sense of belonging is nurtured through learning in familiar surroundings. Educators are positive and affirming with children.

Mentoring teachers and educators understand and value the home setting, where everyday life experiences around the home and community provide opportunities for learning. Children have good opportunities to connect with their local curriculum. Nature school is a special feature of the service, which provides opportunities for children to connect to, and explore their natural environment.

Children under the age of two years form secure attachments with educators in a calm, unhurried, environment. Their individual needs are responded to with sensitivity and respect. Children with additional needs are supported in an inclusive environment. The service works in partnership with agencies and parents.

Te ao Māori is a focus each month to assist educators in the development of a culturally responsive curriculum. This supports Māori children’s identity, language and cultural connections to their local community.

Mentoring teachers need to support educators to use a range of teaching strategies and practices to respond to children’s individual cultures, languages and identity and make this more visible in their assessment records.

Educators notice and record children’s individual interests in their planning. Learning stories show that educators are at various levels of understanding and articulating Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Mentoring teachers now need to support educators to respond to children’s learning, and monitor their progress, in relation to the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki.

Internal evaluation is at the early stages of development. The service leader and mentoring teachers would benefit from reviewing their current processes and aligning these with ERO’s internal evaluation cycle. This would guide the service’s evaluation to focus on improving outcomes for children.

The service now needs to develop a professional growth cycle for mentoring teachers that aligns with the Teaching Council’s expected practice. This cycle would help the service leader to coach mentoring teachers in strengthening their teaching and leadership capabilities.

4 Improvement actions

Back2Nature Koru will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning

  • Further develop internal evaluation processes by focusing on how improvements are impacting on children’s learning.

  • To develop and implement a professional growth cycle to strengthen mentoring teachers’ teaching and leadership capabilities.

  • Increase the extent to which information documented about children’s learning reflects their identity, languages and cultures.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Back2Nature Koru completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Filivaifale Jason Swann
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

20 January 2023 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Back2Nature Koru

Profile Number:

46649

Location

Kamo, Whangarei

Service type

Home-based service

Number licensed for

80 children, including up to 40 aged under 2

Service roll

91

Review team on site

November 2022

Date of this report

20 January 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, March 2021
Education Review, February 2017

Back2Nature - Koru

1 Evaluation of Back2Nature - Koru

How well placed is Back2Nature - Koru to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Back2Nature - Koru is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Back2Nature - Koru is one of two networks operated by the owner/manager. It is licensed as a quality-funded service for 80 children, including 60 up to two years of age. One third of children enrolled have Māori heritage. The service also provides caregiving for school-aged children outside of school hours. At present there are 55 children enrolled with 16 educators. Many of the educators have qualifications, with some working towards a Level 4 early childhood qualification. Four mentoring teachers visit homes monthly to guide educator practice.

The service has a strong focus on children being in nature to grow their interests, knowledge and confidence through exploration and fun. A priority for the service is that children hear and use te reo Māori as part of their learning.

There are two opportunities a week for educators and children to gather through a playgroup (Wāhi Koa|Place of Joy) and a Nature Day. Excursions for nature days are held at a variety of places that include parks, forests and beaches.

The Review Findings

Children appear to be engaged and confident in the care of educators. Records of their learning are collated by educators in assessment portfolios. Mentoring teachers' additions to these portfolios identify sustained play and positive relationships between children and their educators. Parents are well informed and invited to comment using an online portal.

Many educators have begun to use te reo Māori in their stories and observations. Educators include tikanga Māori, such as karakia, before the sharing of food. Tuakana/teina relationships are highlighted when older children support and play with younger children. Mentoring teachers support educators to increase their use of te reo me ōna tikanga Māori with children.

Mentoring teachers could better document how they support educators to recognise and respond to children's learning. Records could show more clearly how their guidance contributes to the development of educators’ understanding of effective early childhood practice. Ongoing reference to these records should help the service to evaluate the impact of educators' professional development on improved outcomes for all children.

Educators' health and safety records in homes are up-to-date and well maintained. Mentoring teachers also maintain monthly records about the hygiene and safety of educators' homes, and children's wellbeing. Educators' homes provide well for children.

The philosophy, strategic direction and vision for the service are evident in the operation and actions taken by all educators, mentoring teachers and administration staff. Policies and procedures are current, shared with educators, and review dates are recorded. However, some systems need reviewing to ensure that required documents are completed, up-to-date, provide required evidence and are securely stored. It would be useful to deepen the focus and intention of self review to increase the robustness of findings and future actions.

Appraisal processes need updating to provide links between job descriptions, performance indicators and professional development. The process of setting goals and follow-up actions should be recorded to help employees reflect on and discuss their professional development. This includes an appraisal process for the owner/manager.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps are to:

  • improve systems to demonstrate the advice, guidance and follow-up provided to educators
  • improve the appraisal processes for educators, mentoring teachers and the owner/manager
  • strengthen the intent and evaluation of self review processes.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Back2Nature - Koru completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Compliance

Since the onsite review, the service has addressed the following non-compliance:

  • maintaining records of safety checking systems, including the risk assessment of staff (GMA6A).

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region - Te Tai Raki

12 March 2021

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service

Location

Whangarei, Northland

Ministry of Education profile number

46649

Institution type

Homebased Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

80 children, including up to 40 aged under 2

Service roll

55

Standard or Quality Funded

Quality

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
other ethnic groups

16
28
11

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

4

Required ratios of educators to children

Under 2

1:2

Over 2

1:4

Review team on site

December 2020

Date of this report

12 March 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Previously reviewed as: ENGAGE Childcare Limited:

Education Review

February 2017

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2008

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

ENGAGE Childcare Limited - 24/02/2017

1 Evaluation of ENGAGE Childcare Limited

How well placed is ENGAGE Childcare Limited to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

ENGAGE Childcare Limited is licensed to provide home-based education and care for 80 children, including up to 40 aged under two years. There are currently 27 children on the roll, most from either Māori or NZ Pākehā backgrounds. Educators in this service work in homes to provide education and care for up to four children at any one time.

The philosophy of the service places a strong emphasis on developing relationships between educators, children and families. These secure relationships are seen as a necessary foundation to support children's learning. Nature and the outdoors feature significantly in the programme. Te Tiriti o Waitangi is acknowledged as the platform to embrace the rich cultural heritage of Aotearoa. The service aims to be inclusive of all children.

The service opened in February 2015 and is led by the owner, who is responsible for overall governance, and a recently appointed coordinator (kaiako). Both are qualified and registered teachers. They work together to provide support and guidance through regular monthly visits for eight educators working in their own homes in the Whangarei area. A weekly playgroup provides an opportunity for service leaders to model new ideas and ways to extend children’s learning in large group situations.

This is the first ERO review of ENGAGE Childcare Limited.

The Review Findings

Learning records show each educator's knowledge of individual children and their learning. Educators have positive and respectful relationships with children and their families. The service continues to focus on strengthening partnerships with whānau, building on parents' aspirations for their children's learning.

Visiting kaiako write monthly reports to educators that focus on children's learning and educator development. Good explanations of children's learning are shared with parents and whānau through individual learning journey records.

Programmes are based on children's interests and include their comments and ideas. Educators provide a variety of learning opportunities for children in their homes and in the community, through regular playgroup sessions and excursions. Visiting Kaiako plan a programme for playgroups with the intended outcomes for children's learning clearly identified.

Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, is very visible in programme planning documentation. Educators' skills in programme planning and assessment of children's learning continue to develop and improve.

Leaders are experienced in delivering a home-based service. They bring in-depth knowledge and a variety of skills to their respective positions. There is a strong focus on continual improvement. Planned professional development supports educators to improve their knowledge and skills to work well with young children.

Internal evaluation is well established. It is supported by research and involves contributions from all involved with the service. There is good alignment between strategic planning, internal evaluation, educator appraisals, and planned professional development. The service's commitment to the continued development of bicultural practice is also clearly evident.

Key Next Steps

Service leaders agree that to enhance their current good quality provision for children they could:

  • improve the continuity between monthly programme plans to support children in the development of more complex thinking

  • strengthen the evaluation of programmes implemented for individual children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of ENGAGE Childcare Limited completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

In order to improve current practices the service provider needs to:

  • develop and implement an appraisal process for qualified teachers that meets the requirements of the Education Council

  • ensure all policies and procedures required under the Licensing Criteria for Home Based Education and Care Services 2008 are developed and fully implemented.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of ENGAGE Childcare Limited will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

24 February 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service 

Location

Whangarei

Ministry of Education profile number

46649

Institution type

Homebased Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

80 children, including up to 40 aged under 2

Service roll

27

Standard or Quality Funded

Standard

Gender composition

Girls 20 Boys 7

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

South African

Spanish

8

14

3

2

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

2

Required ratios of staff educators to children

Under 2

1:2

Over 2

1:4

Review team on site

December 2016

Date of this report

24 February 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

No previous ERO reports

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.