Awhi Educare @ Glenholme

Education institution number:
46633
Service type:
Education & Care Service
Total roll:
23
Telephone:
Address:

149 Ranolf Street, Glenholme, Rotorua

View on map

Awhi Educare @ Glenholme

1 ERO’s judgement of Awhi Educare @ Glenholme is as follows:

Domains: Ngā Akatoro

Below the threshold for quality

Above the threshold for quality

The learner and their learning

He Whāriki Motuhake

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

Collaborative professional learning and development builds knowledge and capability

Whakangungu Ngaio

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

Leadership fosters collaboration and improvement

Kaihautū

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Te Whakaruruhau

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

For an explanation of the judgement terms used and of the evaluation process please refer to the last page of this report. These judgements are based on the evidence provided to ERO during the evaluation.

Children’s health and safety

Improvement required

Taking reasonable steps

2 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.

3 About the Service

Awhi Educare @ Glenholme is located on the grounds of Glenholme primary school. It is one of two privately owned services under shared governance. This service provides education and care for children from birth to school age. Using a whānau approach, the service has mixed-age groupings with a strong focus on manākitanga and aroha. The centre owner works alongside the teaching team to share responsibility for daily operation and curriculum delivery. Most of the children attending this service are tamariki Māori.

4 Progress since the previous ERO report

ERO’s 2020 Akanuku | Assurance Review identified an improvement action related to children’s assessment information. Limited progress has been made in developing the service’s assessment documentation to show children’s progress and learning overtime. Changes in staffing since the last ERO review have hindered this progression. 

5 Learning Conditions

The learner and their learning | He Whāriki Motuhake

Children experience a curriculum that is increasingly responsive to their emerging interests, sense of self and home cultures. 

  • The place-based curriculum provides opportunities for children to learn about and connect with a te ao Māori world. This is supported by excursions to places of significance, understanding of tikanga Māori, use of te reo Māori and 
  • (stories) and pakiwatira (storytelling).
  • Transitions to school are enhanced through connections with the school’s Rumaki class and library. This builds children's understanding of their community, Māori culture and promotes a sense of belonging.
  • Assessment and planning processes are beginning to respond to children’s interests and the aspirations of whānau. Kaiako are yet to intentionally plan and document teaching strategies that extend and enhance children's learning over time.

Collaborative professional learning and development builds knowledge and capability | Whakangungu Ngaio

Leaders and kaiako are taking steps to build their professional knowledge to design and implement a curriculum that is responsive to Māori children.             

  • Relational trust is being established which enables kaiako to work collaboratively on systems and processes that drive ongoing improvement. 
  • A shared leadership approach provides opportunities, recognises and utilises the individual strengths of kaiako. This builds upon kaiako capability and understandings as well as enables a shared focus on the outcomes for children. 
  • The processes which support teachers’ professional growth and the focus for internal evaluation are aligned. While this enables some critical reflection, leading to some shifts in practice, formal documentation of the impact of these shifts on outcomes for learners is not yet in place. 

6 Organisational conditions

Leadership fosters collaboration and improvement | Kaihautū

Governance and leadership provide opportunities for kaiako to take collectively responsibility for the well-being and learning of children and whānau.

  • Communication systems have been developed which enable the sharing of pertinent information and identify who is responsible for actions needed across both services.
  • Kaiako and leaders engage effectively with support agencies and promote practices that value and support the cultural identities of children and their whānau
  • Some quality improvement practices have been established which focus on what kaiako and children are doing. Leaders and kaiako are yet to develop a shared understanding of evaluation to support their engagement in effective evaluation practices. 

Stewardship through effective governance and management | Te Whakaruruhau

Children’s learning and well-being are considered in resourcing and decision making across both services. 

  • A range of strategies are used to promote equity of access and inclusion to enhance children’s ongoing learning and development.
  • Governance work collaboratively to enact aspects of the services vision, values and strategic priorities. 
  • Useful systems, processes and practices have been established. Governance is yet to develop a robust process for monitoring to ensure consistent implementation in practice.

7 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Awhi Educare @ Glenholme completed and ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s system for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children’s health and safety:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (safety checking of staff, ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

8 Where to next for improvement?

Awhi Educare @ Glenholme will include the following actions in its quality improvement planning:

  • Build leadership’s knowledge and understanding of the purpose and use of internal evaluation to evidence the progress of children’s learning over time. 
  • Strengthen local curriculum design, assessment and planning processes to support consistency by developing clear expectations to guide practice that includes: 
  • intentional teaching strategies to extend and enhance children's learning over time
  • taking account of whānau aspirations and the communities agreed priorities for leaning and development
  • evaluation of the effectiveness of teaching strategies in supporting children developing capabilities. 

Activities undertaken by the evaluation team

  • Pre-visit contact with the service provider/manager.
  • Reading documentation and records of children’s learning and development.
  • Scanning the learning environment and resources.
  • Observations of interactions and teaching practice while onsite.
  • Meetings and / or conversations with leaders and teachers.
  • Sampling of information related to compliance.

Further information about how ERO evaluates early childhood services is available here.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

4 October 2024

9 Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameAwhi Educare @ Glenholme 
Profile Number46633
LocationGlenholme, Rotorua
Service TypeEducation and care service
Number licenced for35 children, including up to 8 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers50-79%
Ethnic composition
Using rounded percentages
Māori 103%, NZ European/Pākehā 7%, Pacific 14%
Service roll28
Review team on siteAugust 2024
Date of this report4 October 2024
Most recent ERO report (s)Akanuku | Assurance Review, December 2020; Education Review, October 2017

Description around ERO’s judgement terms

ERO’s judgements are based on Te Ara Poutama and the Early Childhood Education Improvement Framework (teacher led services).

 

Above the threshold for quality

Excelling

The service is excelling in the learning and organisational conditions to support high quality education and care for children

Embedded

The service has embedded its learning and organisational conditions to support ongoing improvement to the quality of education and care for children.
 

Below the threshold for quality

Working towards

The service is working towards establishing the learning and organisational conditions to support improvements in the quality of education and care for children.

Improvement required

The service has not yet developed the learning and organisational conditions to support quality education and care for children.

Awhi Educare @ Glenholme - 07/12/2020

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Awhi Educare @ Glenholme is a privately owned and operated education and care service situated in the Glenholme School grounds. Previously known as Ebabies Educare, it was licensed in January 2019. The owner/centre manager leads a team of seven teachers. This is the centre’s first review as Awhi Educare @ Glenholme.

Summary of Review Findings

Children experience respectful, reciprocal and positive relationships with their teachers. They are encouraged to make choices and learning is based on their interests and dispositions. The well-resourced environment is accessible and inclusive to all.

Parents’ aspirations and goals for their children’s development are evident in portfolios and wall displays. A bicultural and local curriculum supports children’s understanding of the dual heritage of Aotearoa/New Zealand. Policy review and Internal evaluation support change and improvement to the programme and for positive outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • improving the extent to which assessment information shows children’s progress and learning overtime.  

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

7 December 2020  

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameAwhi Educare @ Glenholme
Profile Number46633
LocationRotorua
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for35 children, including up to 8 aged under 2.
Percentage of qualified teachers80%+
Service roll31
Gender compositionMale 15, Female 16.
Ethnic compositionMāori 19, NZ European/Pākehā 3, Pacific 8, Other ethnic groups 1.
Review team on siteOctober 2020
Date of this report7 December 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Supplementary review October 2017.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008. 

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration. 

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake. 

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Ebabies @ Glenholme - 16/10/2017

1 Evaluation of Ebabies @ Glenholme

How well placed is Ebabies @ Glenholme to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Ebabies @ Glenholme is a privately owned education and care centre located on the grounds of Glenholme School in Rotorua. It is licensed for 32 children over two years of age. The centre's roll of 26 children includes 16 who identify as Māori and whakapapa to Te Arawa.

This centre opened in 2016 and since this time has experienced significant changes to the leadership and teaching team. This is its first ERO review.

The centre's philosophy aims to provide quality care and education that is accessible, affordable and which meets the needs of its community. The philosophy also promotes the principles of whakawhanaungatanga, manaakitanga, aroha, tautoko and 21st century e-learning.

The Review Findings

Positive and caring relationships are evident between teachers, children and whānau. Teachers know children and families well. They engage in supportive and respectful relationships with children and whānau. Children, parents and whānau told ERO that they enjoy their time at the centre.

Teachers interact positively with children. They use strategies to invite and develop children's play and learning. There is a natural integration of literacy, including an emphasis on oral language and mathematics. Children observed by ERO, were enjoying cooperative and purposeful play.

The focus on the ‘environment as the third teacher’ is providing children with a range of open- ended resources from which they can choose. Good indoor-outdoor access and flow is evident. There are regular visits to the local and wider community, particularly places of significance to Māori. Children are developing a positive sense of themselves as learners.

The recently appointed head teacher is providing an inclusive and collaborative leadership approach for the centre. She has been involved in developing systems in relation to self review, assessment, planning and evaluation of the programme. This is contributing to an improved child-led, play-based curriculum. In addition, she is implementing an inclusive whānau-based service, with a strong focus on increasing the Māori and Pacific cultural dimensions in the centre. Children benefit from a centre that promotes Māori and Pacific language, culture and identity.

Key Next Steps

Governance and management systems and practices require improvement. These include:

  • human resource and performance management
  • teacher registration
  • policy and procedural review
  • self review.

The service's curriculum is influenced by the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, Te Akonga o nga ngaru, and increasingly Te Whatu Pōkeka. The new teaching team is developing their skills and knowledge in this area. Further development of assessment practices should include:

  • better analysis of the learning to inform planning, resourcing and programmes
  • implementing effective teaching strategies that add complexity for learning
  • stronger evaluation of the quality of education and care for children.

The provision for professional learning and development needs to be strengthened. Stronger alignment with teacher appraisal goals, practising teacher criteria and areas for development identified in this report is needed. This is necessary to build teachers' capability to improve and extend learning outcomes for children.

Clear strategic direction and planning for the growth and development of the service is required. Processes for budgeting and the head teacher's involvement in centre development and management of expenditure is necessary to ensure ongoing sustainability.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Ebabies @ Glenholme completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.

In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to:

  • meeting the Education Council requirements for appraisal and teacher registration
  • review and update of policies relating to Child Protection, Positive Guidance and Performance management.

To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • ensure an ongoing process of self review is implemented to enable the service to maintain and improve the quality of its education and care

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA6, GMA7, C1,C2, HS 31]

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Ebabies @ Glenholme will be within two years.

Lynda Pura-Watson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

Te Tai Miringa - Waikato / Bay of Plenty Region

16 October 2017

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationGlenholme, Rotorua
Ministry of Education profile number46633
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for32 children, including up to 0 aged under 2
Service roll26
Gender compositionGirls 14 Boys 12
Ethnic compositionMāori 
Pākehā
Pacific 
Other
16 

4
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenOver 21:8Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteAugust 2017
Date of this report16 October 2017
Most recent ERO report(s)No previous ERO reports 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.