6B Jack Conway Avenue, Manukau, Auckland
View on mapASPIRE Learning L2
ASPIRE Learning L2
Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.
Little Giggles In-Home Childcare - 10/12/2020
1 Evaluation of Little Giggles In-Home Childcare
How well placed is Little Giggles In-Home Childcare to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
Little Giggles In-Home Childcare is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Little Giggles In-Home Childcare is a homebased service that has two networks. Most of the children enrolled in this network are Samoan or Fijian-Indian. Children are cared for in groups of four or less in the homes of educators. The service's philosophy includes a focus on respecting the dual heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand and celebrating cultural diversity.
A new owner purchased the service in 2019. An experienced coordinator has been appointed to support educators in this network. The owner and coordinator work together to manage the two Giggles networks. The coordinator's primary role is to monitor the quality of programmes provided in homes. Some educators have an early childhood qualification.
ERO's 2017 review identified that careful placement of children in homes was a strength of the service. Areas for improvement included recording improved educator practices resulting from the coordinator's mentoring. Progress has been made in this area.
The Review Findings
Children's learning records show respectful and positive relationships between children and educators. Educators and the coordinator document in-home and community experiences that support children's wellbeing and belonging. A range of learning opportunities are offered to children both indoors and outdoors.
Some educators use home languages with children and work in culturally responsive ways. Bicultural approaches are included in children's everyday experiences in homes.
Programme planning is based on individual children's interests and strengths and is guided by Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. The coordinator has a sound knowledge of Te Whāriki, children's learning theories and effective teaching practices. Coordinator records show how she observes and extends children's learning. Increasing educators' knowledge about regulatory and curriculum requirements is supported through regular coordinator visits to homes.
Regular professional learning support for educators and leaders is provided to build their knowledge and understanding of effective ways to support children's learning. A process for appraisal has been established. The coordinator's leadership supports improvements to curriculum provision and educator practices.
A policy framework that guides service processes and practices has recently been reviewed. An internal evaluation process for planned and spontaneous reviews has been established. This process aligns to the service's strategic direction, vision and mission. Guidance from an external mentor helps the owner and coordinator to develop and improve service operations.
Key Next Steps
Key next steps are to:
- strengthen the recording of individual children's learning progress, in relation to the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki
-
embed internal evaluation processes to support improvements that impact on children's learning.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Little Giggles In-Home Childcare completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Since the onsite review, the service has provided ERO with evidence to show a non-compliance has been addressed relating to:
-
ensuring that all family members of educators are safety checked in accordance with the Children's Act 2014 (Education and Training Act, s25).
Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region - Te Tai Raki
10 December 2020
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service
Location |
Dannemora, Auckland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
46381 |
||
Institution type |
Homebased Network |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
60 children, including up to 60 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
20 |
||
Standard or Quality Funded |
Standard |
||
Gender composition |
Male 12 Female 8 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Fijian Indian |
10 |
|
Number of qualified coordinators in the network |
1 |
||
Required ratios of educators to children |
Under 2 |
1:2 |
|
Over 2 |
1:4 |
||
Review team on site |
September 2020 |
||
Date of this report |
10 December 2020 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
March 2017 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2008
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
-
Very well placed
-
Well placed
-
Requires further development
-
Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Little Giggles In-Home Childcare - 20/03/2017
1 Evaluation of Little Giggles In-Home Childcare
How well placed is Little Giggles In-Home Childcare to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Little Giggles In-Home Childcare has been in operation since 2014. The services offices are located in Dannemora in East Auckland, and its educators are widely spread throughout Auckland's south and eastern suburbs. This is ERO's first review of the service.
The service provider has a background in marketing and management, which is complemented by the manager's professional qualifications and experience in early childhood education. Together, they have made good use of Ministry of Education resources and support personnel to establish appropriate systems and procedures for managing the service.
The service network which is licensed for 80 children, currently has 18 educators and 38 enrolled children. It includes children and educators with culturally diverse backgrounds, of predominantly Pacific and Fijian Indian descent. Children are cared for in groups of four or less in the homes of appropriately selected educators.
Children are mostly in the two to three year old age group, with a few under one year and a group of four year olds who are due to start school in 2017. Many of the educators speak the first language and observe cultural practices of the children they educate and care for. They provide flexible all day and sessional services, of between four to six hours each day to suit the needs of families.
The network has recently appointed a new programme coordinator who works closely with the service manager and the coordinator of a newly established second network. The coordinator's role is to monitor the quality of children's learning and wellbeing through a schedule of planned and informal visits to the educators' homes.
The coordinators and the service manager are all registered teachers with backgrounds in large early childhood education centres. They have a shared commitment to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and to promoting bicultural practices.
The Review Findings
Positive learning outcomes are promoted by the service. Children are thoughtfully placed, where possible, with educators who speak the same languages and respect the child's culture and family values. Small numbers of children, in homely environments, enable children to form trusting relationships and develop a sense of belonging. Through regular parent surveys, the service managers are assured that their families are satisfied with the placements, and with the process for transition into the home-based learning programme.
The service manager and programme coordinator check homes thoroughly before placing children. All educators must complete health and safety induction and have a current first aid certificate. Facilities for infants and toddlers are very carefully selected to ensure they are placed in a calm and nurturing environment. Information from parents show they appreciate the variety of activities provided in homes and the opportunities for children to learn about cultural celebrations. Parents also commented positively on the friendly relationships they have with the owner, coordinator and educators.
The service manager and programme coordinator promote the philosophy of learning through play. They encourage educators to provide a variety of creative learning contexts, including books, games, puzzles, water, painting, and other home-based activities. They encourage educators to include literacy and numeracy activities in children's play and to make use of natural resources. They take a selection of resources when they visit educators' homes to model learning opportunities for children of different ages. Regular playgroups and community excursions foster children's social development and independence.
The manager's and coordinator's curriculum documentation and management records show a good level of leadership and professional practice. Evaluation processes are used to measure the quality of services and improved outcomes for children and families. Appropriate systems, including induction, appraisal and professional development are helping the coordinator and educators to develop a shared understanding of how children communicate and the importance of promoting oral language development.
The service owner, manager and coordinator are committed to self review and improvement. They work well together and have a plan for systematic and spontaneous internal evaluation. Clear philosophy, values and beliefs are embedded across service operations. A comprehensive framework of policies and procedures guides operational requirements. A strategic plan with relevant short term goals informs priorities for development. The owner has developed a good professional network as a member of the Home-Based Early Childhood Association and accesses continuing guidance and support from Ministry of Education advisers.
After two years of operation the owner and service manager are confident to expand this network, and establish a second network.
Key Next Steps
The manager and coordinator agree that the next stage of development could include:
- increasing the involvement of parents, and ensuring that curriculum documentation shows parents' contributions to their child's learning
- documenting improvements in educator practice that result from the coordinator's mentoring and guidance
- using children's strengths, interests and dispositions more explicitly as a basis for planning and recording learning
- strengthening the leadership role of the programme coordinators in order to sustain good practice.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Little Giggles In-Home Childcare completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Little Giggles In-Home Childcare will be in three years.
Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern
20 March 2017
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service
Location |
Dannemora, Auckland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
46381 |
||
Institution type |
Homebased Network |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
60 children, including up to 60 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
38 |
||
Standard or Quality Funded |
Standard |
||
Gender composition |
Boys 25 Girls 13 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Fijian Samoan Indian other Pacific |
17 12 4 5 |
|
Number of qualified coordinators in the network |
1 |
||
Required ratios of staff educators to children |
Under 2 |
1:2 |
|
Over 2 |
1:4 |
||
Review team on site |
November 2016 |
||
Date of this report |
20 March 2017 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s)
|
No previous ERO reports |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.