Ngatea Early Learning Centre

Education institution number:
46354
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
27
Telephone:
Address:

65 Hayward Road, Ngatea

View on map

Ngatea Early Learning Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Ngātea Early Learning Centre is one of two privately owned services. This is the first ERO review under new ownership. A centre manager and lead kaiako work with a team of teachers. The roll consists of 25% Māori children and a small number of other ethnicities.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum is informed by assessment and planning that demonstrate an understanding of children’s learning, their interests, whānau, and contexts. It is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

Children are provided with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development. Their preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning. Children are responded to as confident and competent learners.

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The service curriculum provides a language-rich environment that supports children’s learning.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • Continue to explore ways to increase the involvement of whānau Māori in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the service’s local curriculum, including local pūrākau.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

23 November 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Ngatea Early Learning Centre

Profile Number

46354

Location

Ngatea

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

27 children, including up to 5 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

26

Review team on site

November 2022

Date of this report

23 November 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, September 2021; Education Review, October 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Ngatea Early Learning Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Ngatea Early Learning Centre, previously known as Pukeko’s Educare, is a privately owned education and care service. Ownership has changed several times since ERO’s October 2015 report. The centre was relicensed in March 2021 under current owners.

Summary of Review Findings

Children are involved in a curriculum that provides a range of experiences to enhance and extend their learning and development. Teachers engage in meaningful, positive interactions to nurture reciprocal relationships with children. The service provides an inclusive curriculum that is responsive to the interests of children. Their preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences. Strategies are in place to involve parents and whānau in their children’s learning. An annual plan guides operation and includes a process of self-review that aims to improve the quality of education and care.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • continuing to develop the local curriculum to reflect things that are important to children and their families, to teachers and the wider community
  • providing further opportunities to share and respond to the perspective’s parents and whānau have about their children.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Shelley Booysen
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

9 September 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Ngatea Early Learning Centre

Profile Number

46354

Location

Ngatea

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

27 children, including up to 5 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

30

Ethnic composition

Māori 3, NZ European/Pākehā 24, Other ethnic groups 3.

Review team on site

July 2021

Date of this report

9 September 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

 Education Review, October 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.