17 Fraser Street, Wainuiomata, Lower Hutt
View on mapPukeatua Childcare Centre
Pukeatua Childcare Centre
Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.
Pukeatua Childcare Centre
ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.
ERO’s Judgement
Regulatory standards | ERO’s judgement |
Curriculum | Meeting |
Premises and facilities | Meeting |
Health and safety | Meeting |
Governance, management and administration | Meeting |
At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.
Background
Pukeatua Childcare Centre is governed by Kokiri Pukeatua Trust, Te Rūnanganui o Te Atiawa. Approximately two thirds of children who attend are Māori or of Pacific heritage. There have been staffing changes since the February 2022 ERO review. The service returned to a full licence in August 2022.
Summary of Review Findings
The curriculum supports each child to be confident in their own culture. They are given opportunities to develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Children’s developing social competence is supported by the curriculum. Assessment, planning and evaluation demonstrate an understanding of children’s interests, whānau and life contexts.
Positive steps are taken to respect and acknowledge the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children. Regular opportunities (formal and informal) are provided for parents and whānau to communicate with kaiako about their child’s learning.
Key Next Steps
Next steps include:
- continuing to build kaiako understanding and use of the learning outcomes from Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum
- improving the extent to which assessment information shows children’s learning and progress over time.
Next ERO Review
The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.
Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)
8 June 2023
Information About the Service
Early Childhood Service Name | Pukeatua Childcare Centre |
Profile Number | 46195 |
Location | Wainuiomata, Lower Hutt |
Service type | Education and care service |
Number licensed for | 34 children, including up to 10 aged under 2 |
Percentage of qualified teachers | 50-79% |
Service roll | 30 |
Review team on site | May 2023 |
Date of this report | 8 June 2023 |
Most recent ERO report(s) | Akanuku | Assurance Review, February 2022 Education Review, June 2017 |
General Information about Assurance Reviews
All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.
Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a license to operate.
ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:
- having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
- previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
- that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
- that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
- where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
- relevant evacuation procedures and practices.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:
- discussions with those involved in the service
- consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
- observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.
Pukeatua Childcare Centre
ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.
ERO’s Judgement
Regulatory standards | ERO’s judgement |
Curriculum | Meeting |
Premises and facilities | Meeting |
Health and safety | Not meeting |
Governance, management and administration | Not meeting |
At the time of the review, ERO identified areas of non-compliance with regulatory standards that are an unacceptable risk to children.
Background
Pukeatua Childcare Centre is governed by Kokiri Pukeatua Trust, Te Rūnanganui o Te Atiawa. Since the June 2017 report, a new teaching team has been established that includes a head teacher and senior teacher. The service provides education and care in two large, separate learning areas to meet the needs of the children attending.
Summary of Review Findings
The service does not meet regulatory standards in a number of areas. Governance and management are yet to implement a regular appraisal process and provide opportunities to collaborate with parents and whānau about the service operations. Consistent implementation of health and safety practices is required to meet all aspects of regulatory compliance.
The curriculum provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities to support their interests and needs. Infants, toddlers and older children experience respectful interactions with adults. The premises support the provision of different kinds of indoor and outdoor play, and allows for suitable
supervision.
Actions for Compliance
ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:
- consistently recording the time each child attending the service sleeps, and checks made by adults during that time
- consistent evidence of approval from the person responsible for excursions
- consistent recording of all medications given to children attending the service including written authority and acknowledgement from parents
- information is provided to parents about how they can be involved in the service, amount and details of the expenditure of MOE funding and any planned reviews and consultation
- parents are provided with opportunities to contribute to the development and review of the service’s operational documents
- a system of regular appraisal for all qualified teachers.
Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS9, HS17, HS28, GMA3, GMA4, GMA7.
Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:
- the first aid kit complies with the requirements of Appendix 1, and is easily recognisable to adults
- secured a microwave, wall unit and piano that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage
- a documented risk management system that shows that accidents and incident records are analysed to identify hazards and appropriate action is taken. Hazards to the safety of children are eliminated, isolated or minimised
- temperature of warm water delivered from taps that are accessible to children is no higher than 40°C, and comfortable for children to use
- water stored in any hot water cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60°C
- a record of training and/or information provided to adults who administer medicine to children.
Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF28, HS6, HS12, HS13, HS14, HS29.
Recommendation to Ministry of Education
ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence issued to this service provider. ERO will not undertake a further review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets regulatory standards.
Next ERO Review
The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.
Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini
18 February 2022
Information About the Service
Early Childhood Service Name | Pukeatua Childcare Centre |
Profile Number | 46195 |
Location | Wainuiomata |
Service type | Education and care service |
Number licensed for | 50 children, including up to 10 aged under 2. |
Percentage of qualified teachers | 50-79% |
Service roll | 43 |
Ethnic composition | Māori 22, NZ European/Pākehā 6, Samoan 4, Other Pacific heritages 4, Other ethnicities 7. |
Review team on site | November 2021 |
Date of this report | 18 February 2022 |
Most recent ERO report(s) | Education Review June 2017, Education Review October 2014. |
General Information about Assurance Reviews
All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.
Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.
ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:
- having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
- previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
- that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
- that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
- where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:
- discussions with those involved in the service
- consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
- observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.