White Heron @ the Bridge

Education institution number:
45913
Service type:
Education & Care Service
Total roll:
50
Telephone:
Address:

2 S Domain Road, Mangere Bridge, Auckland

View on map

White Heron @ the Bridge

1 ERO’s judgement of White Heron @ the Bridge is as follows:

Domains: Ngā Akatoro

Below the threshold for quality

Above the threshold for quality

The learner and their learning

He Whāriki Motuhake

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

Collaborative professional learning and development builds knowledge and capability

Whakangungu Ngaio

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

Leadership fosters collaboration and improvement

Kaihautū

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Te Whakaruruhau

Improvement required

Working towards

Embedded

Excelling

For an explanation of the judgement terms used and of the evaluation process please refer to the last page of this report. These judgements are based on the evidence provided to ERO during the evaluation.

Children’s health and safety

Improvement required

Taking reasonable steps

2 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.

3 About the Service

White Heron @ The Bridge is one of 2 services under the same ownership and governance. An area manager and centre manager support a team of qualified and unqualified teachers. The service caters for children under 2 in a dedicated space, and a mixed age setting for older children. The philosophy highlights partnership with whānau and responding to children as individuals. An ethnically diverse roll features a large number of Māori and Pacific learners.

4 Progress since the previous ERO report

The 2021 ERO report identified two improvement actions relating to the design and implementation of a responsive curriculum and supporting older children’s agency over their learning. Good progress has been made by the service leaders and teachers, by strengthening established practice to intentionally respond to the culture and language of individual children in partnership with parents and whānau. Support for older children to lead their learning has been maintained and strengthened through improved teacher practice. Well managed change in the organisation structure and leadership has facilitated the steady growth of the service.

5 Learning Conditions

The learner and their learning | He Whāriki Motuhake

Embedded learning-focused partnerships with parents and whānau clearly support the development and delivery of a culturally responsive curriculum for children.

  • Parents share aspirations for their child’s learning and have an active voice in how these are responded to through the design of the curriculum. 
  • Children’s individual language and culture is well responded to in the centre curriculum. Consistent and meaningful use of te reo Māori and a range of Pacific languages and celebrations reflect the children, families, and staff of the centre. 
  • Assessment of children’s learning is consistent and reflects children’s learning over time, with some aspects of children’s progress aligned to the learning outcomes from Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Clear reflection of children's progress in this process is developing. 

Collaborative professional learning and development builds knowledge and capability | Whakangungu Ngaio

Clear systems and processes enable leaders and teachers to continue to develop and refine their teaching practice to respond to children as individuals.

  • Children’s learning is well supported through teachers’ professional knowledge of how to respond meaningfully to the groups of learners in the centre. 
  • Leaders and teachers draw on their own cultural knowledge to design and implement a curriculum that reflects the cultures present in the centre. 
  • Teachers are developing their understanding of how to use inquiry and evaluation to better understand what works and what doesn’t for groups and individual learners. Professional growth systems are embedded, however evaluation to understand the impact of shifts in teacher practice on outcomes for children is yet to happen. 

6 Organisational conditions

Leadership fosters collaboration and improvement | Kaihautū

A culture of collaboration and focus on ongoing professional growth is enacted by leaders and governance to support positive learning outcomes for children.

  • Relational trust enables team collaboration and improvement. Leaders have identified the strategies that support this growth and remain focused on continuing to build team culture. 
  • Leaders provide the conditions to mentor and grow professional knowledge and leadership capability within the teaching team.
  • A useful process for evaluation and inquiry has been developed and embedded by leaders. Evaluation and inquiry contributes to effective monitoring of the curriculum. Leaders are working to support teachers to understand improvement practices and fully utilise these systems. 

Stewardship through effective governance and management | Te Whakaruruhau

Clear and well understood processes support governance to develop and refine strategic decisions and positively impact on resourcing decisions.

  • Parent aspirations are reflected in the priorities and vison for the service, and children’s wellbeing is clearly prioritised in decision making at this level. 
  • Processes of monitoring and review support the effective operation of the service. Partnership with external agencies strengthen the known impact of decisions made by governance for children. 
  • Findings from improvement practices are used to clearly guide decisions that directly impact tamariki, whānau and kaiako at curriculum and strategic level. 

7 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of White Heron @ the Bridge completed and ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s system for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children’s health and safety:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (safety checking of staff, ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

8 Where to next for improvement?

White Heron @ the Bridge will include the following actions in its quality improvement planning:

  • For leaders and teachers to further embed and make clear the link between children’s progression over time and the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki.
  • Teachers to further develop their understanding of the use of evaluation within internal evaluation and teacher professional growth cycles.

Activities undertaken by the evaluation team

  • Pre-visit contact with the service provider/manager.
  • Reading documentation and records of children’s learning and development.
  • Scanning the learning environment and resources.
  • Observations of interactions and teaching practice while onsite.
  • Meetings and / or conversations with leaders and teachers.
  • Sampling of information related to compliance.

Further information about how ERO evaluates early childhood services is available here.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

4 October 2024

9 Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameWhite Heron @ the Bridge 
Profile Number45913
LocationMangere Bridge, Auckland
Service TypeEducation and care service
Number licenced for46 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers80-99%
Ethnic composition
Using rounded percentages
Māori 49%, Samoan 12%, Tongan 12%, Cook Island Māori 7%, Niuean 3%, other ethnic groups 17%.
Service roll57
Review team on siteAugust 2023
Date of this report4 October 2024
Most recent ERO report (s)Akarangi | Quality Evaluation, March 2021; Education Review, June 2017

Description around ERO’s judgement terms

ERO’s judgements are based on Te Ara Poutama and the Early Childhood Education Improvement Framework (teacher led services).

 

Above the threshold for quality

Excelling

The service is excelling in the learning and organisational conditions to support high quality education and care for children

Embedded

The service has embedded its learning and organisational conditions to support ongoing improvement to the quality of education and care for children.
 

Below the threshold for quality

Working towards

The service is working towards establishing the learning and organisational conditions to support improvements in the quality of education and care for children.

Improvement required

The service has not yet developed the learning and organisational conditions to support quality education and care for children.

White Heron @ the Bridge

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama- indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. The Akarangi Quality Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform the ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for White Heron @ the Bridge are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

ERO’s judgement

What the service knows about outcomes for learnersWhakaū Embedding

Ngā Akatoro Domains

ERO’s judgement

He Whāriki Motuhake

The learner and their learning

Whakaū Embedding

Whakangungu Ngaio

Collaborative professional learning builds knowledge and capability

Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Aronga Whai Hua

Evaluation for improvement

Whakaū Embedding

Kaihautū

Leaders foster collaboration and improvement

Whakaū Embedding

Te Whakaruruhau

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

White Heron @ the Bridge is one of four services owned by White Heron Learning Services Ltd. This centre provides education and care for up to 46 children, including up to 10 children up to the age of two years. Children of Māori and Pacific Island heritage make up a large proportion of the roll. The centre is in the grounds of Mangere Bridge School.

3 Summary of findings

Children’s mana is recognised and fostered within the curriculum. Kaiako support children to take responsibility for their own and others’ wellbeing and to care for the environment. They provide opportunities for children to learn about the local community through regular excursions.

Kaiako acknowledge, respect and respond to children’s identities, languages and cultures. Māori children and whānau have authentic opportunities to contribute to the curriculum. Kaiako integrate te reo and tikanga Māori into daily teaching practices. They value and celebrate Pacific and diverse groups of children and their aiga for who they are and what they bring to the service.

Kaiako who work with infants and toddlers maintain a calm, slow pace that gives younger children space and time to lead their learning. Practices promote holistic learning and development and demonstrate that care is understood to be an integral part of the curriculum.

Leaders and kaiako work with whānau and external agencies to access support for children with additional learning needs. Leaders advocate for and alongside whānau to ensure all children have access to high quality, inclusive education.

Internal evaluation generates new knowledge for leaders and kaiako. They inquire into aspects of their practice, by asking themselves what works and why. This evaluative process results in changes being made to centre practices that are based on evidence.

Leaders and kaiako have good opportunities for professional learning and mentoring designed to help them develop their knowledge, skills and teaching capabilities. Leaders provide opportunities for kaiako to build their knowledge and understanding of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and what it means for teaching and learning in this service.

Governance and management enact the principles of te Tiriti o Waitangi through partnerships, policies and practices. They actively pursue ways to ensure equity and social justice for children and whānau. Human resource policies, procedures and practices promote kaiako recruitment that reflects the whānau of this service.

4 Improvement actions

White Heron @ the Bridge will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • leaders and kaiako will provide older children with opportunities to set goals, and lead and assess their learning
  • leaders and kaiako will develop their professional knowledge and cultural competence to design and implement a meaningful curriculum responsive to the interests, strengths, abilities and needs of individual children.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of White Heron @ the Bridge completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

12 March 2021 

6 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service NameWhite Heron @ the Bridge
Profile Number45913
LocationMangere, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for46 children, including up to 10 aged under 2.
Percentage of qualified teachers80%+
Service roll58
Ethnic compositionMāori 13
NZ European/Pākehā 7
Samoan 14
Tongan 10
Niuean 5
other ethnic groups 9
Review team on siteDecember 2020
Date of this report12 March 2021
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, June 2017
Education Review, December 2013

White Heron @ the Bridge - 30/06/2017

1 Evaluation of White Heron @ the Bridge

How well placed is White Heron @ the Bridge to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

White Heron @ the Bridge is one of four services owned by White Heron Learning Services Ltd. This centre opened on the Mangere Bridge School grounds in June 2012 and is licensed for 46 children, including 10 up to the age of two years.

The centre operates under the Ministry of Education 'Counties Manukau Participation Project', with a focus on raising participation in quality ECE for Māori and Pasifika children and children from low socio-economic backgrounds, within the local target census area. Pākehā children and those from Asian, Indian and European ethnicities also attend the service. There are two separate groups for infants and toddlers, and for older children.

Managers are committed to employing experienced staff from the local community who can work well as a team. Procedures for selecting staff are very deliberate and are carefully implemented. Nearly all of the teachers are registered.

The 2013 ERO report noted that the centre's next steps included strengthening programme planning, increasing challenge in the environment, and engaging children in more complex conversations. ERO recommended that appraisal processes be linked to professional development goals, and the centre's philosophy and current theories in early childhood education be used to guide self review. The owner, centre leaders and teachers continue to respond positively to these next steps. Health and safety matters identified in the 2013 ERO report have been addressed.

The Review Findings

Most of the older children engage in responsive conversations with each other and their teachers. They frequently use te reo Māori. Children know the expectations for appropriate behaviour and learn new social skills. They are imaginative in their play, and participate appropriately in daily routines. Teachers could consider ways for children to take greater responsibility for their learning environment.

Infants and toddlers are supported to develop oral language skills by engaging in conversational interaction. Teachers mainly use English and also encourage the children's home languages in conversations. The core group of staff working with infants and toddlers has warm relationships with children, and supports their emotional security.

Centre leaders have developed a strategic plan that acknowledges the importance of te Tiriti o Waitangi. Priorities include developing ongoing partnerships with whānau Māori, welcoming the participation of tamariki and whānau in the centre, and protecting the uniqueness of each tamaiti attending the service. Children and new teachers learn about traditional stories from the local community and the whakapapa of the nearby maunga. They are now keen to learn more about the history of the tangata whenua.

Leaders are working to make links between parents' aspirations, children's assessment records and teachers' programme planning. This is to promote closer partnerships with whānau to support children's learning.

Leaders support teachers' practice through professional development and regular individual mentoring. They are growing teachers' knowledge about how to implement an effective curriculum. Leaders are currently focused on improving the quality of the curriculum provided for the children. They recognise that this is an important area for development.

Key Next Steps

The owner and centre leaders agree that next steps are to:

  • refine the centre's strategic goals and evaluate the effectiveness of teaching practices and curriculum provision
  • focus on documenting and using internal evaluation findings to guide decision making and improvement
  • continue working with the local school to improve transition-to-school processes for children and their whānau
  • review and refine centre manager/leader appraisal processes.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of White Heron @ the Bridge completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of White Heron @ the Bridge will be in three years.

Violet Tu'uga Stevenson

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

30 June 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

LocationMangere Bridge, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number45913
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for46 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Service roll62
Gender compositionBoys 33 Girls 29
Ethnic compositionMāori
Pākehā
Tongan 
Samoan 
Cook Islands Māori
Niue 
other
20
11 
7
6
5
4
9

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:3Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:9Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteMay 2017
Date of this report30 June 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewDecember 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.