Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre

Education institution number:
45315
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
6
Telephone:
Address:

926 Mt Eden Road, Three Kings, Auckland

View on map

Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre is privately owned. A qualified centre manager is responsible for governance of the service. She leads a team of one qualified teacher, and two staff members. The service philosophy reflects a Montessori approach, where children’s development is promoted in a
well-prepared environment. Children attending the centre are from diverse cultural backgrounds.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The curriculum supports children’s developing social competence and understanding of appropriate behaviour.

The curriculum provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development both indoors and outdoors, individually and in groups. Children experience a language-rich environment that supports their learning.

Consistent implementation of processes and practices is required to maintain regulatory standards.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • providing further opportunities for parent and whānau perspectives about their children to be shared and responded to

  • building teachers’ knowledge about the theories and research that underpin Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

Actions for Compliance

During and since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring that any windows or other areas of glass accessible to children are either made of safety glass or covered by an adhesive film designed to hold the glass in place in the event of it being broken, or effectively guarded by barriers which prevent a child striking or falling against the glass (PF7).

  • Having a tempering valve or other accurate means of limiting hot water temperature that is installed for the requirements of criterion HS13 to be met (PF24).

  • Ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage are secured (HS6).

  • Having a record of all medicine (prescription and non-prescription) given to children attending the service that includes the amount of medicine administered (HS28).

  • Ensuring that The Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008, and the Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008 are prominently displayed at the service for parents and visitors (GMA1).

  • Providing written information letting parents know how to access the service’s operational documents (GMA2).

  • Providing information to parents about any planned reviews and consultation (GMA3).

  • Having evidence of opportunities provided for parents and adults providing education and care to contribute to the development and review of the service’s operational documents (GMA4).

  • Having a process for reviewing and evaluating the service’s operation (for example, its curriculum, learning and teaching practices, philosophy, policies, and procedures) by the people involved in the service (GMA6).

  • Ensuring that before a person is employed or engaged as a children’s worker, that a safety check as required by the Children’s Act 2014 must be completed. A detailed record of each component of the safety check must be kept, and the risk assessment should be completed and dated after all relevant information is obtained. This includes maintaining a record of all safety checks and the results (GMA7A).

  • Having an attendance record that meets the requirements outlined in the Early Childhood Education Funding Handbook for children currently attending (GMA11).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

26 June 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre

Profile Number

45315

Location

Three Kings, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

18

Review team on site

April 2023

Date of this report

26 June 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, August 2018; Education Review, March 2015  

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a license to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre - 22/08/2018

1 Evaluation of Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre

How well placed is Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre provides full-day and sessional education and care for up to 16 children over two years of age. The centre serves a multicultural community in Three Kings, with many of the children from families who have recently immigrated to New Zealand. The centre was purchased by the current owner in 2015.

The centre's philosophy has recently been reviewed and the educational approach now reflects the teachings of Maria Montessori. Teachers have made changes with the support of professional learning and development and they have also purchased relevant resources.

The centre manager manages a group of eight centres. She is supported by a centre supervisor who provides leadership for three other registered teachers and support staff. Further professional leadership is provided by a registered teacher who works across the owner's group of centres.

This is the first ERO review since the change of ownership and management of the centre.

The Review Findings

Children benefit from learning in a calm, respectful environment. They are well supported to develop a sense of identity and belonging. Children experience positive interactions with their teachers and with one another. Teachers know the children and their families well. They are often able to talk with children in their home languages while supporting them to develop their communication in English.

The centre philosophy is reflected in the programme and in the approach taken to learning and teaching. Children are viewed as capable learners, and teachers encourage them to manage their own play and to follow their interests. The centre's commitment to the Treaty of Waitangi is evident in the environment and in aspects of the curriculum in action. Teachers regularly use te reo Māori with children.

Children learn within the framework of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. At the same time, the centre is appropriately resourced to reflect the Montessori approach to teaching and learning. Effective processes guide teachers' assessment of children's learning and their planning for relevant learning opportunities. Teachers observe children's play, giving them time to make their own decisions and to initiate conversations. They share this information with parents through learning stories, and record their planned responses to promote further learning.

The centre is well staffed with a high ratio of teachers to children. Teachers work well as a team to support children and to grow professionally. The manager provides relevant professional learning opportunities, and the appraisal process is improvement focused.

The centre regularly uses internal evaluation to support ongoing improvement. The centre manager could consider using evaluative questions to guide investigations into the effectiveness of centre practices. When an area for development is identified, it could be included in the centre's strategic and annual planning to guide the actions taken to bring about improvement.

Centre staff work inclusively in partnership with parents. Teachers encourage parents to share their cultures with children through the programme. They help parents to understand the intentions of Te Whāriki, and how to support their children as they transition to school.

Key Next Steps

The manager acknowledges that the outdoor area needs redevelopment, and planning for this has begun. Centre managers/leaders agree that other next steps include:

  • strengthening internal evaluation and strategic planning to identify and plan for ongoing centre improvement

  • auditing policies and procedures to ensure that a comprehensive set of current policies is available to parents and staff

  • continuing to encourage parents to contribute to the assessment of, and planning for, their children's learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve practice, the manager should ensure that there are more robust systems in place to ensure that staff identify and address all health and safety matters in a timely fashion.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Little Kiwis Playhouse Early Learning Centre will be in three years.

Julie Foley

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

22 August 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Three Kings, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

45315

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

16 children aged 2 years and over

Service roll

17

Gender composition

Girls 12 Boys 5

Ethnic composition

Chinese
other

9
8

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2018

Date of this report

22 August 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Under different ownership/management

Education Review March 2015
Education Review April 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.