79 Hutcheson Street , Mayfield, Blenheim
View on mapMayfield School (Blenheim)
Mayfield School (Blenheim)
School Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
About the School
Mayfield School provides education for learners in Years 1 to 6. At the time of the review, 83 learners were enrolled in the school. The school roll is 33% European/Pākehā learners, 47% Māori learners, 11% Pacific learners and the remainder from other ethnicities. Learners are encouraged to use and live the school values of Whakawhaungatanga, Manaakitanga, Hauora to support their learning wellbeing.
Part A: Parent Summary
How well placed is the school to promote educational success and wellbeing?
How well are learners succeeding? | The school is working towards high levels of success and progress for all learners. |
What is the quality of teaching and learning? | Learners benefit from good quality teaching practice that improves progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics. The school is improving teaching and learning. |
How well does the school curriculum respond to all learners needs? | Learners have sufficient opportunities to learn across the breadth and depth of the curriculum. There is an increasingly consistent focus on supporting learners to gain skills in literacy and mathematics. Learners with complex needs are well supported to achieve their education goals. |
How well does school planning and conditions support ongoing improvement? | The school is establishing planning and conditions that support improvements in the quality of education for learners. |
How well does the school include all learners and promote their engagement and wellbeing? | The school reasonably promotes learners’ engagement, wellbeing and inclusion. |
How well does the school partner with parents, whānau and its community for the benefit of learners? | The school is improving its reporting to parents / whānau about their child’s learning, achievement and progress. The school is improving its collection and use of information gathered through community consultation to inform strategic planning and curriculum decisions. |
Student Health and Safety | The school board is taking reasonable steps to ensure student health and safety. |
Achievement in Years 0 to 8
This table outlines how well students across the school meet or exceed the expected curriculum level.
Foundation Skills | |
Reading | A large majority of learners meet or exceed the expected curriculum level. Results are not yet equitable for all groups of learners. |
Writing | A small majority of learners meet or exceed the expected curriculum level. Results are not yet equitable for all groups of learners. |
Mathematics | A large majority of learners meet or exceed the expected curriculum level. Results are not yet equitable for all groups of learners. |
Attendance
The school is behind the target of 80% regular attendance.
The school is developing a suitable plan in place to improve attendance.
Regular attendance is improving towards or beyond the target.
Chronic absence is reducing over time.
Assessment
The school is improving its approach and the reliability of its practices to accurately find out about achievement against the curriculum.
Teachers are developing assessment information to adjust teaching practices to ensure ongoing improvement in teaching and student progress.
Progress
The school is developing good quality planning to increase the rate of progress for all groups of students.
The school has to some extent improved achievement and progress for those learners most at risk of not achieving since the previous review.
The school has to some extent extended achievement and progress for learners working at or above curriculum levels since the previous review.
The school is making some progress towards meeting Government reading, writing and mathematics and/or pānui, tuhituhi and pāngarau for 2030 and agrees this will need to be a key strategic priority.
An explanation of the terms used in the Parent Summary can be found here: Guide to ERO school reports
Part B: Findings for the school
This section of the report provides more detail for the school to include in strategic and annual planning for ongoing improvement across the school.
Areas of Strength
Learners express a sense of belonging, and knowledge of the school values; learners are well supported through inclusive teaching and school practices to ensure their wellbeing needs are met.
Leaders are strengthening relational trust and effective collaboration across the school as they work towards achieving improvement priorities. Leaders provide effective and targeted professional learning for teachers to support improvement of school-wide teaching practice.
Structured literacy is embedded across the school through the Better Start Literacy Approach (BSLA). A structured mathematics programme has been implemented, and professional learning is supporting delivery of the mathematics programme.
Staff work collaboratively and engage in professional learning that strengthens efficiency in their teaching practices to improve outcomes for all learners.
A shared school-wide understanding of evaluation for improvement is developing; the school is working towards a planned approach to school improvement.
Key priorities and actions for improvement
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
- develop consistent monitoring and assessment practices that respect cultural identity and engage all learners
- effectively analyse and use assessment information for informing teaching, learning and reporting
- strengthen teaching practice across the school to improve outcomes for learners, particularly for groups of learners in writing
- develop attendance procedures, alongside whānau engagement, to increase regular attendance.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.
Within three months:
- teachers complete professional learning in e-asTTle writing assessment to further develop their knowledge and skills in the effective use of this assessment tool
- teachers engage in professional learning for the new mathematics curriculum to inform and grow their mathematics programme design and teaching practice
- leaders implement a professional growth cycle plan which includes classroom observations to provide feedback to teachers on how well they are improving student achievement
- leaders will develop an attendance and whānau engagement plan and implement it across the school
Every six months:
- evaluate learner progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics; focus on increasing and sustaining high quality teaching to ensure excellence in learner outcomes
- monitor classroom teaching practices with a continued focus on strengthening high-quality practice
- use quality evidence, including learner outcomes and community feedback, to inform strategic planning of school-wide goals
Annually:
- engage with the community to check and ensure that their aspirations are reflected in all aspects of the school strategic direction
- further strengthen trust between the school and community improving learner success and engagement
- review and refine clear expectations for high-quality teaching; document and use high-quality evidence to inform school-wide planning
- review learning programmes to align with national curriculum changes.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
- improved learner progress, achievement and equity in reading, writing and mathematics for all learners
- high-quality teaching that has a focus on improving and sustaining outcomes for all learners; strengthened expertise in, and consistent and effective use of, selected assessment tools
- strengthened internal evaluation practices that support learner progress and achievement, and informs school-wide planning
- improvement in regular attendance and engagement of all learners.
Part C: Regulatory and Legislative Requirements
Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements
All schools are required to promote student health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
During this review the Board has attested to some regulatory and legislative requirements in the following areas:
Board Administration
Yes
Curriculum
Yes
Management of Health, Safety and Welfare
Yes
Personnel Management
Yes
Actions for Compliance
ERO has identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:
- Safety checking of workforce meets legislative requirements including keeping accurate records about each aspect of the safety checking process
[Sections 25 to 27, Children’s Act 2014; Regulations 5 to 8, Children’s (Requirement for Safety Checks of Children’s Workers) Regulations 2015; Section 104, Clauses 9 to 12, Schedule 4 Education and Training Act 2020]. - Policies and procedures must comply with physical restraint regulations, rules and guidelines [Education (Physical Restraint) Rules, 2023; Sections 99 to 101 Education and Training Act, 2020].
The board has since addressed the areas of non-compliance identified.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki
Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Sharon Kelly
Director of Schools (Acting)
26 March 2025
Education Counts
This website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Mayfield School (Blenheim)
Findings
Trustees, leaders and teachers have been proactive in addressing most of the next steps from the 2017 report. With external advice, leadership capacity has been built through internal evaluation processes to ensure effectiveness. As a result student achievement and wellbeing have improved, with particular emphasis on priority learners. Trustees are now clear about their roles and responsibilities and have a real focus on continuing to lift student achievement and wellbeing. They have developed a sustainable cycle of planning, assessment, improvement and internal evaluation.
ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.
1 Background and Context
What is the background and context for this school’s review?
The July 2017 ERO review raised some concerns about accelerating student achievement for those children who need it. It also noted the quality of learning and teaching programmes that were resulting in poor achievement outcomes for many students. School achievement data for 2017 showed declining achievement, with many targets for improvement not met.
Leadership and management practices were identified as needing improvement to enable a shift in disparity of achievement through better quality assessment. Another priority was to inquire into the effectiveness of teaching and learning programmes to fully promote successful outcomes for all children.
The 2017 ERO report also identified that the board needed to make sure it was fulfilling its governance roles and responsibilities, particularly related to the regular review of polices and processes to ensure student health and safety.
Trustees, leaders and teachers have been proactive in addressing most of the areas for improvement outlined in the 2017 report. The findings of the latest review are outlined below.
2 Review and Development
How effectively is the school addressing its priorities for review and development?
Priorities identified for review and development
- student achievement
- leadership and management
- internal evaluation
- bicultural perspectives
- governance.
Progress
Children learn in positive environments with focused learning opportunities to lift their achievement. Teachers use intentional strategies and modify their approaches to support children’s learning and development needs. Assessment practices are more targeted and focus on individual learning needs that are closely monitored at individual and class levels. Teachers know their children and whānau well.
In conjunction with the teaching as inquiry reflections, leaders and teachers have used internal evaluation processes to give better information about the reasons for children’s achievement. They have taken a positive approach to supporting children’s learning and behaviour.
The curriculum has been reviewed in 2018. Children benefit from a curriculum that contains clear expectations for all learning areas for achievement, assessment and reporting. Māori and other children would benefit from a more bicultural approach to curriculum content and goals.
Trustees now receive comprehensive reporting from lead teachers on progress against student-focused strategic goals. This collaborative approach is having a positive impact on all student learning, but in particular on the wellbeing and achievement of boys.
The new distributed leadership model is a significant improvement. Leaders and teachers have developed an effective key task document in line with the school's strategic and student achievement goals. This is a highly reflective tool allowing for ongoing evaluation against key goals, and is also shared regularly with the board to inform decision making.
Key next steps
Leaders and teachers now need to continue to embed:
- bicultural perspectives, including developing ways to acknowledge and build on Māori children’s cultural strengths so they enjoy success as Māori
- the collaborative approach to leadership
- targeted, effective practices to lift achievement
- the use of spirals of inquiry across the school, including increasing student voice in this process.
The senior leadership team has identified the need to evaluate the effectiveness of the leadership approach used across the school.
3 Sustainable performance and self review
How well placed is the school to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance?
The school is better placed to sustain and improve its performance. Trustees, leaders and teachers now have a cohesive, strategic planning structure linked to the vision and values and focused clearly on lifting student achievement and wellbeing.
Throughout 2018 leaders and teachers have worked hard to develop good systems for reflection on the effectiveness of their teaching and learning programmes. Inquiries into their practice have promoted changes to teaching and learning strategies, resulting in improved monitoring, achievement and wellbeing for all children.
Since the 2017 ERO review some new trustees have been appointed. Trustees have had personalised training in their roles and responsibilities and are focused on improving achievement and supporting the wellbeing of all children. They now have delegated roles and responsibilities to support the operation and governance of the school.
The board and senior leaders have reviewed and strengthened policies and procedures about education outside the classroom. They now have good practices in place and an improved overall policy review system through an on-line policy framework. They have consulted on, and reviewed the strategic plan, clarifying the school’s vision for learners at Mayfield School.
Development of the school’s website has improved communication with the community and other stakeholders. Parents and whānau have been consulted through a wide range of communication strategies, resulting in high levels of engagement of parents in learning programmes and the school’s vision and values.
The school has strong community links and has benefited from involvement in the Piritahi Kāhui Ako|Community of Learning (CoL).
Key next steps
Trustees and leaders have identified, and ERO agrees, that the key next steps are to:
- access further board training about evaluating achievement and wellbeing information
- continue to build leadership
- develop further internal evaluation capability at all levels of the school.
Board assurance on legal requirements
Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:
- board administration
- curriculum
- management of health, safety and welfare
- personnel management
- financial management
- asset management.
During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:
- emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
- physical safety of students
- teacher registration
- processes for appointing staff
- stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
- attendance
- school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.
Conclusion
Trustees, leaders and teachers have been proactive in addressing most of the next steps from the 2017 report. With external advice, leadership capacity has been built through internal evaluation processes to ensure effectiveness. As a result student achievement and wellbeing have improved, with particular emphasis on priority learners. Trustees are now clear about their roles and responsibilities and have a real focus on continuing to lift student achievement and wellbeing. They have developed a sustainable cycle of planning, assessment, improvement and internal evaluation.
ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.
Alan Wynyard
Director Review and Improvement Services Southern
Southern Region
28 February 2019
About the School
Location | Blenheim | |
Ministry of Education profile number | 2912 | |
School type | Contributing (Years 1 to 6) | |
School roll | 124 | |
Gender composition | Boys 50% ; Girls 50% | |
Ethnic composition | Māori Pākehā Pacific Other ethnicities | 35% 27% 9% 29% |
Review team on site | November 2018 | |
Date of this report | 28 February 2019 | |
Most recent ERO report(s) | Education Review Education Review Education Review | July 2017 May 2013 May 2007 |