Dyer Street School

Dyer Street School

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Dyer Street School, in Lower Hutt Wellington, provides education for learners in Years 1 to 6. The current principal was appointed mid-2022. The values of manaakitanga, aumangea, ngākaunui and ako were adopted in consultation with students, staff, whānau and mana whenua, to enhance the mana of all students.

There are two parts to this report.

Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki/bilingual settings.

Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Outcomes for learners are becoming more equitable and excellent.  
  • A large majority of students are achieving at or above curriculum levels in mathematics, reading and writing; Māori students are achieving as well as their peers.
  • Students’ sense of wellbeing is evident, supported by an inclusive culture and responsive teaching practices. 
  • The majority of students attend regularly; the school is not yet meeting the Ministry of Education attendance targets.

Conditions to support learner success

Leadership is establishing a culture of high-quality teaching to progress student outcomes.  
  • Leaders are developing clear, shared expectations for teaching and learning to improve student engagement and outcomes.
  • Progress and achievement information is collated for individual students and reported to the board; a key next step is to consider all groups of students and the specific support they might need going forward. Progress and achievement information is collated for individual students and reported to the board; a key next step is to consider all groups of students and the specific support they might need going forward.
  • Leaders deliberately collect whānau voice to inform strategic initiatives including the school vision and values.
Teachers are increasingly delivering effective, evidenced-based programmes to meet students’ needs.
  • Teachers work collaboratively to deepen their knowledge of evidenced based teaching practice in reading, writing and mathematics to accelerate student progress; there is some consistency in teaching practice. 
  • Professional learning, facilitated by leadership and outside providers, supports and develops teaching practice, aligns to strategic initiatives and improves outcomes for students.
Leaders and the board are establishing conditions to bring about school improvement.
  • Students with additional learning needs are well supported to progress; teachers and whānau work together to clearly identify strengths and individual needs.
  • Leaders value the diverse school community; they are developing schoolwide culturally responsive practices to strengthen partnerships in learning and curriculum development.
  • Positive and respectful learning relationships between teachers and students promotes inclusivity and supports engagement.

Part B: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

  • strengthen assessment practice and moderation processes to inform learning initiatives and interventions to accelerate progress and achievement
  • develop a consistent, evidenced-based approach to teaching and learning to meet the needs of all learners
  • establish a local curriculum in partnership with students, whānau and iwi; strengthen the use of te reo Māori, tikanga Māori and mātauranga Māori learning across the school
  • strengthen systems and processes for monitoring and improving student attendance.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within six months:

  • review assessment practice and moderation processes and develop schoolwide consistency to support planning for accelerated learning
  • develop explicit expectations using evidenced-based approaches for teaching and learning; analyse and report progress and achievement for all groups of learners
  • strengthen capacity in te reo Māori, tikanga Māori and mātauranga Māori to support the development of a local curriculum
  • use attendance data to identify and implement targeted strategies

Every six months:

  • analyse assessment information to plan learning initiatives and interventions to improve learning outcomes
  • review the impact of evidenced based teaching and learning on student achievement using classroom observations, student voice and progress information
  • evaluate the local curriculum with students, whānau and iwi, focusing on improvement to student engagement, progress and achievement
  • track and monitor mid-year attendance information; review and adjust targeted strategies

Annually:

  • track, analyse and report on achievement, progress and attendance information to the board to identify and plan priority actions
  • evaluate the impact of evidenced-based teaching, including interventions for accelerated progress and achievement
  • evaluate and report to the board on engagement with whānau and iwi to inform future partnership initiatives.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

  • improved student progress and achievement as a result of a consistent, evidenced-based approach to teaching, learning and assessment
  • a local curriculum developed in partnership with students, whānau and iwi; strengthened capacity in the use of te reo Māori, tikanga Māori and mātauranga Māori
  • improved levels of attendance that meet or exceed the Ministry of Education’s target for regular attendance.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki
Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

8 November 2024

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.  educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Dyer Street School

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements Report ​2024​ to ​2027​

As of ​August 2024​, the ​Dyer Street School​ Board has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements: 

Board Administration

​Yes​

Curriculum

​Yes​  

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

​Yes​ 

Personnel Management

​Yes​ 

Finance

​Yes​ 

Assets

​Yes​ 

Further Information

For further information please contact ​Dyer Street School​, School Board.

The next School Board assurance that it is meeting regulatory and legislative requirements will be reported, along with the Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report, within three years.

Information on ERO’s role and process in this review can be found on the Education Review Office website.

​Shelley Booysen​
​Director of Schools​

​8 November 2024​

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Dyer Street School - 28/02/2018

School Context

Dyer Street School is in Naenae, Lower Hutt. The school caters for 206 students in Years 1 to 6, and 36% are Māori and 15% Pacific. The school roll has reduced since the 2014 ERO review.

The school’s stated vision for student success is to develop: learners who are confident, competent and flexible. The LEARN values underpin teaching and learning. 

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics, and in relation to school goals
  • wellbeing.

There have been changes to leadership and teaching staff including a new principal in term 4, 2014.

The school is part of the Naenae Kāhui Ako|Community of Learning.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

School leaders are working to reduce the disparity in outcomes for Māori, Pacific and boys to achieve equitable outcomes for all students.

School achievement information shows that from 2014 to 2016 the large majority of students achieved at or above national expectations in reading, writing and mathematics.

This data shows that boys achieved significantly lower results in mathematics, reading and writing where the level of disparity is widening. Māori student achievement is lower than their peers within the school in all areas, though 2017 data shows that disparity is reducing in reading and mathematics. Pacific students achieved less well than their peers overall.

Many students require additional support for their learning. At the time of this ERO review, the roll included 7% of students with complex learning needs and 6% who have English as their second language. They are well supported with appropriate programmes and interventions. Their progress is monitored against each student’s individual education plan.

1.2 How effectively does this school respond to those Māori and other students whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

Leaders and teachers are working to increase the effectiveness of the school’s response to those Māori and other students whose learning needs acceleration.

School end of year data for 2017 shows some students, including Māori and Pacific, who were identified as priority learners at the start of the year, have made accelerated progress.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence?

Leaders have reviewed and refined their systems to better meet the needs and accelerate the progress of target students, especially in writing. Priority learners are well identified. A sound process effectively tracks, monitors and reports on the overall achievement of these students.

Teachers collaboratively inquire into the effectiveness of their practice, planning and assessment to better respond to the needs of students. Teachers gather, collate and make good use of a suitable range of assessment information to inform decision making. Moderation practice appropriately supports valid and dependable assessment judgements by teachers.

There is a purposeful learning environment. Relationships among students and with teachers are positive and respectful. Staff promote students’ wellbeing, sense of identity, belonging and engagement in learning. Student voice is valued. Increasing student responsibility and making decisions about their learning is a key strategic priority.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence?

School charter targets and reporting to the board are about overall achievement against national expectations. The school should consider refining target setting and reporting to specifically focus on accelerating the progress of priority students, groups and cohorts. This should enable leaders and trustees to better monitor and respond to the school’s goal of achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all students.

The school curriculum is being reviewed. Key aspects for development are:

  • establishment of clear and explicit expectations for the use of local themes and contexts that include and value students’ culture, language and identity
  • building teacher capability and culturally responsive practice through focused coaching and appraisal that leads to consistently high quality teaching and learning.

Leaders recognise the need to strengthen internal evaluation processes. They have adopted a standard format to guide evaluation, though this is not yet consistently used schoolwide. Increasing the use of well-analysed data to inform evaluations should enable leaders and trustees to better measure the impact of programmes and inform planning for ongoing improvement.

3 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

4 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • a collaborative approach and high expectations from trustees, leaders and teachers that promote improved outcomes for students
  • providing a positive and respectful learning environment that supports students’ engagement and learning
  • identifying, tracking, monitoring and responding to the needs of priority learners to improve their levels of achievement.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, development priorities are in:

  • achieving equitable outcomes across learning areas and for all groups of students within the school
  • enhancing culturally responsive practice for teaching and learning to better support learners’ language, culture and identity
  • internal evaluation processes and practices, to determine the impact of initiatives, identify and embed effective practice, and inform ongoing improvement. [ERO will provide an internal evaluation workshop for trustees and senior leaders.]

ERO’s next external evaluation process and timing

ERO is likely to carry out the next external evaluation in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

28 February 2018

About the school

LocationLower Hutt
Ministry of Education profile number2833
School typeContributing (Year 1 to 6)
School roll206
Gender compositionMale 51%, Female 49%
Ethnic compositionMāori 36% 
Pākehā 37% 
Pacific 15% 
Other ethnic groups 12%
Provision of Māori medium educationNo
Review team on siteNovember 2017
Date of this report28 February 2018
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review February 2014
Education Review January 2010 
Education Review February 2007