Long Bay College

We maintain a regular review programme to evaluate and report on the education and care of young people in schools.

We are in the process of shifting from event-based external reviews to supporting each school in a process of continuous improvement.

There may be delays between reviews for some schools and kura due to Covid-19 and while we transition to our new way of reviewing.

Read more about our new processes and why we changed the way we review schools and kura.

Find out which schools have upcoming reviews.

Education institution number:
27
School type:
Secondary (Year 9-15)
School gender:
Co-Educational
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
1563
Telephone:
Address:

Ashley Avenue, Torbay, Auckland

View on map

School Context

Long Bay College is a large, co-educational secondary school catering for students from Years 9 to 13. It is located in Long Bay, on Auckland’s North Shore. The student roll includes six percent Māori and two percent Pacific learners. At the time of this report, 154 international students attended the college.

A new principal was appointed in 2017, and new positions have become available on the senior management team. The board of trustees works positively with the leadership group. A highly valued, local kaumatua is closely involved in the school’s bicultural development.

The college states that its overarching vision for students is to promote ‘personal excellence for global success’. The mission statement supports the school values that acknowledge respect, resilience, inclusion, confidence and pride. The school culture increasingly values student voice and places a high priority on student wellbeing for learning.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • achievement within the New Zealand Qualifications framework

  • pathways and destination outcomes for senior students

  • achievement data for Years 9 and 10

  • progress and achievement in relation to school targets

  • pastoral and wellbeing information about student groups and cohorts

  • participation, contribution and engagement information across a number of sporting, arts and cultural areas

  • retention, stand down, suspension and attendance information.

The school environment offers students a range of good quality learning spaces and facilities. The Māori language classroom is well established and positions te reo me ngā tikanga Māori at the centre of the school.

The high expectations for student achievement noted in the 2013 ERO report continue to be evident.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The college is achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for students.

The board of trustees and school leaders continue to prioritise high levels of success for all students in the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA). The school’s roll-based data show that most students are achieving very well in NCEA Level 1, 2 and 3. Year level groups have sustained these positive results since the 2013 ERO review. The school’s outcomes for NCEA and University Entrance are consistently above national averages and above percentages for similar schools.

Approximately 85 percent of students achieved NCEA Level 1 and 2 in 2017, including Māori learners. Parity is evident for Māori students in University Entrance and at NCEA Levels 2 and 3. Generally, girls achieve better than boys in NCEA Level 3 and University Entrance. However, college leaders continue to be strongly focused on boys’ engagement, and are planning other vocational opportunities within the curriculum derived from senior students’ pathways preferences.

Overall, there has been a significant increase in NCEA merit endorsements at Level 3 and good scholarship results are evident across a range of subjects.

For Year 9 and 10 students, leaders and teachers use nationally normed assessment tools to gather achievement information as students enter Year 9. This is used in conjunction with transition information from teachers in contributing schools as students leave Year 8. Particularly useful is the strengthening relationship with the other six schools in the Oneroa Kahui-Ako Community of Learning cluster (COL). This is helping the exchange of knowledge about learners as they move from one school to another.

Priority students are identified at Year 9 if they are at risk of not achieving. Class teachers, department leaders and senior management track and monitor them to regularly gauge their accelerated progress. This means students, families and whānau get ongoing information about their progress through junior learning programmes and curriculum levels. Current school achievement information shows that after two years, most junior students reach New Zealand Curriculum Level 6, the standard required to learn successfully at NCEA Level 1.

In the event that senior students continue to need additional support and strategies to help with their learning at Year 11, 12 and 13, the college’s extensive monitoring and tracking systems continue to offer that opportunity.

Other valued student outcomes evident in the college’s learning culture are young people who:

  • gain a holistic view of learning

  • have confidence to engage in and contribute to learning

  • are inclusive of diversity and difference.

Valued student outcomes are explicitly promoted and developed as an intrinsic part of the college’s curriculum.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

Long Bay College leaders and teachers have the capacity to accelerate learning for all students. The school is successfully addressing small parity issues for some groups of learners. Staff have worked relentlessly and effectively to strengthen parity for Māori, Pacific and other students whose first language is not English.

School information shows that, since 2013, most learners who have made good levels of progress or accelerated progress over a two-year period in the junior school go on to achieve senior NCEA qualifications at Level 2 or above.

Māori students, at NCEA Level 2 and 3, have made small accelerated shifts in their achievement over the last three years. Eighty-seven percent of Māori students gained NCEA Level 2 in 2017. In University Entrance qualifications, there are some disparities for Pacific learners, which are being strategically addressed.

Learning support for students with additional needs is well-coordinated. There is effective liaison between classroom teachers, deans and specialist agencies. The school’s highly inclusive learning culture helps all students participate in a breadth of learning experiences.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

The principal’s leadership, the board’s stewardship, and the learning culture for students are effective school conditions that enable learners to achieve equity and excellence.

The board of trustees is strategically focused on a college ethos where excellence is defined as students striving for their personal best. The principal is effectively managing high quality change leadership based on evaluative thinking and researched evidence. This is promoting the continuing development of a collaborative school culture that is student-driven and future-focused.

Senior and middle leaders deliberately plan for equity and excellence through personalising approaches and systems for learning. The opportunity for individualised programmes is a key driver in the school’s strategic planning.

Teachers continue to grow their capability in trialling ways to support students who need to make accelerated shifts in their learning. There is a strong focus on tracking and monitoring students’ progress using several ‘numbers, names and needs’ approaches. Subject teachers plan different actions when additional learning strategies are needed to ensure successful outcomes. Learner support systems work effectively for students who have different or additional needs.

There is a school-wide curriculum focus on building ‘self-managed’ learning behaviour. Year 9 students have a well-considered “learning to learn” programme that focuses on such themes as building resilience and growth mind-sets and the science of the adolescent brain. Parent groups are invited into the school to learn about teenage developmental psychology and management.

Students and staff work with digital platforms that can extend learning time for students, groups of students and teachers. This allows more personalised learning contact and helps to widen the breadth and scope of self-directed learning.

The recently introduced teacher appraisal process is of high quality and reflects the Education Council’s professional standards. Performance management aligns with strategic school priorities and learning initiatives.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

ERO and school leaders agreed on areas for further school improvement including:

  • extending and enriching the junior curriculum to further engage students with learning in creative and innovative ways

  • external expertise to complement the school’s development of culturally responsive teaching and learning

  • the formation of an internal leadership group to support te reo me ngā tikanga Māori development school-wide

  • strengthening parity of achievement for boys at NCEA Level 3 and UE

  • a significant mentor teacher system to carry the long-term learning profile of each student.

3 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • finance

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Provision for international students

The school is a signatory to the Education (Pastoral Care of International Students) Code of Practice 2016 (The Code) established under section 238F of the Education Act 1989. The school has attested that it complies with all aspects of the Code.

At the time of this review there were 154 international students attending the school. International students are well cared for and experience programmes that are suited to their learning and promote their wellbeing. The school’s monitoring system for international students is well administered. The board receives reports about the quality of education provided for international students, their care and how well they are progressing and achieving.

4 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • senior leadership capability

  • a learning culture that is student-focused for all round success

  • a strong focus on personalised excellence for all.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • junior curriculum review and design

  • external expertise to enhance culturally responsive learning

  • enhanced pathway design for male students at NCEA Level 3.

ERO’s next external evaluation process and timing

ERO is likely to carry out the next external evaluation in four-to-five years.

Julie Foley

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

8 August 2018

About the school

Location

Torbay, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

27

School type

Secondary (Year 9-13)

School roll

1408

Gender composition

Girls 49% Boys 51%

Ethnic composition

Māori 6%
Pākehā 53%
Chinese 4%
other European 28%
other Asian 4%
other 5%

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

Yes

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

June 2018

Date of this report

8 August 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review June 2013
Education Review February 2010
Education Review November 2006

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

Students at Long Bay College benefit from the school’s caring and inclusive culture and have many opportunities to participate in a wide variety of academic, cultural, arts and sporting activities.

Since ERO’s 2010 review, the college has made significant changes in the school curriculum. In response to needs of students and the community, curriculum developments are based on research- and are future-focused. The school’s curriculum prepares students to make well informed decisions about their learning pathways and future opportunities.

The school continues to plan carefully for ongoing roll growth and the future educational needs of students. Approaches to the use of information and communications technologies (ICT) as teaching and learning tools, are well considered. The recent provision of a wharenui, and ongoing planning for the development of the school environment, reflects the board’s commitment to valuing and respecting New Zealand’s bicultural heritage.

The college is well governed and well led. The board of trustees is highly supportive of the principal and staff, and has a sound understanding of its governance role. Trustees and school leaders have responded positively to the suggestions for improvement made in ERO’s 2010 report.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

The board of trustees and school leaders set meaningful annual academic targets based on reliable information. The school culture is one of shared, whole-school responsibility for improving outcomes for students.

The school uses student achievement information effectively, particularly at Years 11 to 13, to make positive changes in learners’ engagement, progress and achievement. Teachers are continuing to develop their skills in gathering meaningful achievement information at Years 9 and 10. The school actively helps parents to understand and contribute to their child’s progress, achievement and next learning steps. School data indicates increased levels of student engagement through participation in co-curricular activities, and high retention of students to Years 12 and 13.

School leaders, teachers and trustees are justifiably proud of the high levels of NCEA student achievement, including scholarships. School NCEA achievement information indicates that students, including Māori and Pacific students, are continuing to progress and achieve well. Since the last ERO review, significant improvements have been made in overall NCEA merit and excellence endorsements.

Students receive high quality learning support. The progress of all students is closely monitored. Data is well used to develop programmes specific to individual student needs. There are good indications that these interventions are successful in supporting students to make accelerated progress.

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

The school curriculum is highly effective in promoting and supporting student learning. It continues to be well aligned with the principles of The New Zealand Curriculum and places good emphasis on students as capable and confident learners.

The school has redesigned its curriculum in response to current research on adolescent development. Students benefit from a wide variety of carefully considered pathways for learning suited to their interests, strengths and needs. The curriculum structure and flexible course timetabling enable students to follow their preferences. The provision of pastoral care has been reviewed to help ensure that it supports students more effectively to make informed choices about their future learning and careers.

Teachers and leaders are encouraged to be innovative and challenge each others’ thinking. As a result, students enjoy high levels of academic success across the curriculum. Students in vocational pathways achieve national recognition for their outstanding achievement in competitions. In addition, many students are involved in a variety of community events, demonstrating their commitment to service and evolving citizenship.

High quality teaching practice is evident in many classrooms. The school’s 'Success Guide', launched in 2012, clearly articulates expectations for effective teaching and learning that is based on how students develop and learn. Teachers are reflective about their practice and enjoy positive, supportive relationships with their students.

School leaders should continue to:

  • investigate the impact of the school’s restructured curriculum, including its alignment with The New Zealand Curriculum
  • consider more ways to increase students’ knowledge and ownership of their learning, progress and achievement
  • further integrate Māori contexts, content and language into teaching and learning across the curriculum.

How effectively does the school promote educational success for Māori, as Māori?

The school has a genuine commitment and a growing capacity to promote educational success for Māori as Māori.

The Years 9 to 13 te reo Māori programmes affirm and support Māori students’ identity, language and culture. These programmes, and the recently opened wharenui, encourage Māori learners to connect with each other in a way that affirms their identity and supports success as Maōri.

Many classroom programmes enable Māori students to share their knowledge and to express themselves as Māori. Teachers are increasingly monitoring and tracking the progress and achievement of their Māori students. Māori students have good access to information, advice and support relevant to their abilities and aspirations. Their success is celebrated and they enjoy leadership roles.

Next steps for development are to:

  • encourage Māori students to value their heritage, identify with each other, and celebrate being Māori
  • further enhance teaching practices and teachers’ capacity to engage with learners and their whānau
  • find further ways to consult and engage effectively with whānau of Māori children and with the wider Māori community.

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

A culture of self review for improvement prevails. School trustees, leaders and teachers have shown that they are very well placed to sustain and improve their performance. The school’s readiness to investigate and adapt new ideas from research, manage change, and develop professional practice in teaching and learning is noteworthy.

Teacher professional learning and development is well aligned to the school’s clear mission statement, vision and strategic plan. The senior leadership and pastoral roles have been restructured to better manage and support students’ learning, progress and achievement.

The following features reflect the school’s capacity to sustain and improve its performance:

  • strong alignment between the school’s mission and vision statements, strategic and annual planning, professional development, performance management systems, and high expectations of staff and students
  • effective leadership by the principal and the supportive senior leadership team
  • transparent communication with parents and the school community
  • thoughtfully considered provision of buildings and a learning environment that meets changing needs in student learning
  • an experienced board that is supportive of school direction and clearly understands its governance responsibilities.

The inclusive student-centred culture, and positive, respectful relationships, support the board of trustees, school leaders and staff to advance student learning and achievement. School leaders and the board continue to define meaningful ways of using student information to guide decision making. More in-depth evaluative self-review reports to the board would help to inform the board about the effectiveness of initiatives, and would help guide decision making.

Provision for international students

The school is a signatory to the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (the Code) established under section 238F of the Education Act 1989. The school has attested that it complies with all aspects of the Code. ERO’s investigations confirmed that the school’s self-review process for international students is thorough.

At the time of this review, 99 international students were attending the school. The school actively seeks to diversify the international student presence by including students from Asian countries, as well as from Europe and South America.

High levels of self review have led to significant changes in the provision and care for international students. International students are thoughtfully placed in programmes that enable them to achieve their goals. Their English language needs are very well supported. Ongoing monitoring helps to ensure that students are well integrated into the life of the school and have leadership opportunities.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

When is ERO likely to review the school again?

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in four-to-five years. 

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services Northern Region

14 June 2013

About the School

Location

Long Bay, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

27

School type

Secondary (Years 9 to 15)

School roll

1657

Number of international students

99

Gender composition

Boys 51% Girls 49%

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā

Māori

South African

British/Irish

Chinese

Pacific

Other Asian

Other European

Other

52%

4%

17%

14%

2%

1%

5%

2%

3%

Review team on site

May 2013

Date of this report

14 June 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

February 2010

November 2006

August 2003