Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool

Education institution number:
25304
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Samoan ECE service
Total roll:
45
Telephone:
Address:

4 Nikau Road, Otahuhu, Auckland

View on map

Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool is a well-established service providing total immersion aganu’u fa’asamoa and gagana Samoa language curriculum. The board provides governance support to a teaching team led by a registered and experienced centre manager and two qualified supervisors. There are two buildings that cater for children from infants to school age. The philosophy values Samoan language and Christian values.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults have nurturing reciprocal relationships with children, respect their preferences, and involve them in decisions about their learning. They support children’s developing social competence and understanding of appropriate behaviour.

The curriculum is language rich, inclusive, and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. It respects and supports children’s rights to be confident in their own cultures and encourages them to understand and respect other cultures.

Centre leaders must ensure that policies, procedures, and practices are consistently maintained to continue meeting regulatory standards.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include increasing the:

  • opportunities children have to hear and speak te reo Māori in meaningful learning contexts 
  • visibility of how faiaoga are recording parents’ aspirations, and responding to them in assessment, planning and evaluation information. 

Actions for Compliance

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Having a designated assembly areas for evacuation purposes outside the building to keep children safe from further risk (HS5).
  • Having a procedure people should follow if they wish to complain about non-compliance with the Regulations or criteria including the option to contact the local Ministry of Education office and provides contact details (GMA 1).
  • Ensuring before a person is employed or engaged as a children’s worker, as defined in the Children’s Act 2014, a safety check must be completed (GMA7A).

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Having a current fire evacuation scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand (HS4).
  • Ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage are secured (HS6).
  • Having a procedure, and implementing a process, for monitoring children’s sleep ensuring that children do not have access to food or liquids while in bed; and are checked for warmth, breathing, and general wellbeing at least every 5 to 10 minutes, or more frequently according to individual needs (HS9).
  • Having a daily hazards checklist that must include cleaning agents, medicines, poisons, and other hazardous materials, vandalism, dangerous objects, and foreign materials (e.g., broken glass, animal droppings); the condition and placement of learning, play and other equipment; windows and other areas of glass; and bodies of water (HS12).
  • Having evidence to show temperature of warm water delivered from taps that are accessible to children is no higher than 40°C (HS13).
  • Having evidence to show water stored in any hot water cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60°C (HS14).
  • Ensuring records of excursions include the names of adults and children involved (HS17).
  • Having evidence of parental permission for any travel by motor vehicle (HS18).
  • Ensuring the record of the written authority from parents for the administration of medicine is in accordance with the requirement for the category of medicine outlined in Appendix 3 (HS28).
  • Ensuring enrolment records for each child currently attending meet the requirements of the Early Childhood Education Funding Handbook and include details of any chronic illness/condition that the child has, and of any implications or actions to be followed in relation to that illness/condition (GMA10).
  • Ensuring attendance records including attendance registers that have been marked by staff on a twice daily basis and evidence (e.g a signed attendance register) that a parent/guardian of each child has regularly examined and confirmed the attendance record once a week (GMA11).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

9 November 2023 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameSeugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool
Profile Number 25304
LocationOtahuhu, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for60 children, including up to 18 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers80-99%
Service roll54
Review team on siteSeptember 2023
Date of this report9 November 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, July 2019; Education Review, October 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool - 10/07/2019

1 Evaluation of Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool

How well placed is Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool is licensed to provide full-day education and care for 60 children, including up to 18 infants and toddlers. The service's philosophy has a strong focus on promoting Samoan language, culture and identity, and Christian values. Most children are of Samoan heritage, and a small numbers are of other Pacific groups and NZ European/Pākehā.

A new building (Nikau) caters for children aged three to five years of age. The infants and toddlers remain in the neighbouring original building (Mason).

Since ERO's 2015 review, a new supervisor has been appointed in Mason, and four teachers have been appointed in both teaching areas. A centre manager guides teaching practice for both areas. All teachers are qualified and there are two teacher aides in support roles.

The aoga amata operates under the umbrella of the Congregational Christian Church of Samoa. The aoga amata board is responsible for governance, comprises of church, parents and staff representatives.

The 2015 ERO report identified key development areas, including the quality of teaching, learning and self-review. Positive progress has been made in these areas.

The Review Findings

Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool is well placed to continue promoting positive learning outcomes for children. Children are friendly, confident, and interact well with their peers and teachers. They are empowered to take increasing responsibility for the wellbeing of themselves and others. Children have a strong pride and sense of belonging in Samoan language, culture and identity. Teachers deliberately foster children's social and emotional competence.

Children participate in an integrated programme that allows them to freely explore the well-resourced indoor and outdoor learning environments. They are happy and active in the decisions about their own play choices. Children enjoy group times and the many music and movement learning opportunities. They confidently speak and sing in the Samoan language, and willingly share conversations with each other and adults.

Children are challenged to follow up on an interest with greater depth. They benefit from learning programmes based on concepts that identify their interests, dispositions, and next steps for learning. Children enjoy a range of learning opportunities through centre excursions that enhance their development.

Teachers' effective teaching practices support children’s play. The assessment processes and programme planning align closely to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Teachers work well as a team to develop their leadership skills. They are supportive of each other and promote the centre's goals and values, including fostering children's joy in learning. Teachers prioritise opportunities to build children's oral language in learning interactions.

Te reo me ōna tikanga Māori is a feature of the centre. Cultural events are celebrated with children and families. Centre leaders are committed to continuing to develop the centre's bicultural curriculum.

Teachers have recently reviewed and strengthened transition processes. Children experience positive transitions within the centre and on to school, supported by responsive partnerships with families and neighbouring schools. Their sense of belonging is nurtured during and after transitions.

Teachers are welcoming to children and families. They provide many opportunities to keep parents informed. Teachers gather family aspirations that contribute to programme planning.

The aoga amata is well led. Managers and trustees are strategic and financially prudent. They consider the centre's long-term sustainability, and ensure that children's wellbeing and learning are priorities. Strategic planning is comprehensive and focused on ongoing improvement. Internal evaluation is well understood, purposeful and focused on improved outcomes for children. An effective leadership approach and a professional learning structure provides mentoring, leadership, relevant professional development, and appraisal support for teachers to improve their teaching practice.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders have identified key next steps for ongoing improvement. They include:

  • continuing to embed the philosophy of Te Whāriki and teaching strategies to extend children's thinking and creativity
  • strengthening the bicultural perspective in the curriculum
  • continuing to improve learning environments to reflect the aoga's philosophy of fa'a Samoa and learning
  • enhancing internal evaluation processes by using indicators of effective practice
  • reviewing and refining centre policies to distinguish between policy and procedures.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Seugagogo Aoga Amata Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

10 July 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationOtahuhu, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number25304
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for60 children, including up to 18 aged under 2
Service roll50
Gender compositionGirls 27 Boys 23
Ethnic compositionNZ European/Pākehā 
Samoan
Tongan 
other ethnic groups

37

1
Percentage of qualified teachers80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:7Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteMay 2019
Date of this report10 July 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewOctober 2015
Education ReviewOctober 2011
Education ReviewJune 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.