ME Family Services - Early Childhood

Education institution number:
25301
Service type:
Education & Care Service
Total roll:
94
Telephone:
Address:

16-18 Ferguson Street, Mangere East, Auckland

View on map

ME Family Services - Early Childhood

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

The ME Family Services - Early Childhood operates as a service of the Mangere East Family Service Centre (MEFS). A qualified centre manager and a practice manager lead the team of five qualified teachers and five staff. Most of the children attending the service are of Māori or Pacific heritages.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum respects and supports the right of each child to be confident in their own culture and encourages children to understand and respect each other. It acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua.

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships.

Children access a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development. The design and layout of the premises support the provision of different types of indoor and outdoor experiences.

Systems for monitoring compliance with health and safety, as well as governance, management and administration require development to ensure the regulatory standards are maintained.

Key Next Steps

  • Improve the extent to which assessment information shows children’s progress and learning overtime.
  • Increase the visibility of how kaiako are responding to children’s interests and dispositions, and to parents’ aspirations, in assessment, planning and evaluation information.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite review, the service provided ERO with evidence to show the following non-compliances have been addressed:

  • Ensuring all heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall and cause serious injury are secured (HS6).
  • Having a list of safety and emergency supplies and resources sufficient for the age and number of children and maintaining them (HS7).
  • Maintaining evidence that earthquake drills are completed on a three-monthly basis (HS8).
  • Having a procedure for monitoring children’s sleep ensures that children do not have access to liquids while in bed (HS9).
  • Ensuring children’s bedding is hygienically stored when not in use (HS11).
  • Having a written procedure for safety checking all children’s workers and completing a safety check before the worker has access to children (GMA7A).
  • Having an annual plan that includes how key tasks will have regard to the Statement of National Education and Learning Priorities (NELP) (GMA8).

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

19 July 2024

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameME Family Services - Early Childhood
Profile Number25301
LocationMangere East, Auckland 
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for75 children, including up to 15 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 50-79%
Service roll57
Review team on siteApril 2024 
Date of this report19 July 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, June 2020; Education Review, September 2017. 

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

ME Family Services - Early Childhood - 02/06/2020

1 Evaluation of ME Family Services - Early Childhood

How well placed is ME Family Services - Early Childhood to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ME Family Services - Early Childhood is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

The ME Family Services - Early Childhood centre operates as a service of the Mangere East Family Service Centre (MEFS). It is licensed for 75 children, including up to 15 under two years of age. The centre offers full-day education and care in a mixed-aged group programme. Māori children make up more than half of the centre's roll. Most other children have Pacific backgrounds with the largest group having Samoan heritage.

The centre's philosophy is based on children being 'confident, competent learners with strong cultural values'. The philosophy is underpinned by a commitment to bicultural practices and pou including ako, whanaungatanga, tino rangatiratanga, aroha, mana, turangawaewae and manaakitanga. The philosophy has been developed with staff to guide the centre's direction.

The MEFS is a non-profit organisation that helps local whānau. The centre is governed by a board. It is managed by the CEO of the MEFS, the social work manager, the accountant and the early childhood centre manager, who is a qualified early childhood teacher. The centre manager and practice manager lead a team of five qualified staff and six support staff.

The 2017 ERO report identified several positive features that have been sustained. Good practice included children having a sense of belonging, positive relationships with children and whānau, and good transitions into the centre and to school. The report also identified the need to develop robust self review and appraisal systems, effective governance and leadership. It also commented on the need to improve the quality of programme planning, implementation and evaluation. The centre has addressed these recommendations with the assistance of the Ministry of Education.

The service is a member of the Whakatipu Akoranga Kāhui Ako | Community of Learning.

The Review Findings

Children are confident, settled and play cooperatively alongside their peers in an inclusive setting. Children's wellbeing is nurtured through respectful relationships with teachers and each other. Tuakana/teina relationships are evident and support the development of emotional and social competence. This results in children having a strong sense of belonging in the centre.

Children are encouraged to take responsibility for their immediate and wider environment. Teachers foster children's ownership in the centre and social responsibility through a focus on environmental sustainability.

Infants and toddlers receive nurturing and respectful care from teachers. Their individual preferences and care routines are supported. Unhurried, responsive caregiving promotes children's strong and secure attachments with teachers.

Children benefit from an environment where their language, culture and identity are celebrated. Teachers are sensitive and responsive to differences in children's cultural backgrounds. Interactions with children and families of Pacific heritage are culturally responsive. Teachers often converse with parents and children in home languages. Children and families feel welcomed in the centre.

Teachers are committed to strengthening bicultural practices. They acknowledge the whakapapa of Māori children and integrate some tikanga in centre practices. Whānau are warmly welcomed and encouraged to be involved in the centre. Leaders and teachers are beginning to develop te ao Māori perspectives, bicultural and Tiriti-based practices in the centre.

Deepening planning and assessment is a centre-wide focus for development. Teachers maintain individual learning portfolios for each child. These assessment records keep whānau informed about their children's learning and the events in the centre. Centre leaders are working collaboratively to provide quality outcomes for children.

Relationships are based on respect, trust and reciprocity. Leaders promote equity for children and their families. Leaders and teachers build respectful relationships with families/whānau and are committed to finding increasingly effective ways to communicate.

Sound policies and systems are in place, although staff implementation of these is variable. Established internal evaluation and appraisal systems are responsive to identified priorities. Leaders are committed to providing targeted professional development to further develop teaching and learning to improve children's learning outcomes.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders agree that key next steps include:

  • ensuring the curriculum responds to individual children's strengths, needs and interests to increase children's engagement in their learning
  • strengthening assessment and embedding teaching strategies that extend children's prior knowledge, skills and interests
  • further developing tikanga Māori and practices that reflect Te Tiriti o Waitangi to support children's learning about the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of ME Family Services - Early Childhood completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve current practice, the early service management should review with staff their understanding of the service's policies and procedures.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region - Te Tai Raki

2 June 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationMangere East, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number25301
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for75 children, including up to 15 aged under 2 years
Service roll63
Gender compositionGirls 32 Boys 31
Ethnic compositionMāori 
NZ European/Pākehā
Samoan 
Cook Island Māori
Tongan 
other ethnic groups
36
1
12
6
5
3
Percentage of qualified teachers50-79%
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:5Meets minimum requirements
Over 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteFebruary 2020
Date of this report2 June 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewSeptember 2017
Education ReviewFebruary 2014
Education ReviewFebruary 2011

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Mangere East Family Service Centre - 08/09/2017

1 Evaluation of Mangere East Family Service Centre

How well placed is Mangere East Family Service Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Mangere East Family Service Centre requires support to improve management practices, internal evaluation and documentation, and to help teachers develop responsive curriculum planning and implementation.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

The Mangere East Family Service Centre is a non-profit incorporated society. The organisation has recently rebranded and operates as ME Family Services (MEFS). The early childhood centre operates as a core service of the MEFS, which is adjacent to the Mangere East School. It caters for a culturally diverse community. Māori children make up 44 percent of the centre's roll, 24 percent are Tongan and 30 percent have other Pacific backgrounds.

The service was established in consultation with the community in 1993. It provides assistance to whānau, including parenting programmes, child health and education services, social workers in schools, and waste minimisation/resource recovery programmes. The centre is governed by a board. It is managed by the CEO of the MEFS, the social work manager, the accountant and the early childhood centre manager, who is a qualified educator.

The early childhood centre's licence has recently been extended to cater for up to 75 children, including up to 15 under two years of age. As a result, the roll and the number of staff have more than doubled. The building has been extended to cater for these numbers. The outdoor learning environments have also been enlarged and upgraded, and the original interior fully refurbished.

The 2014 ERO report identified the need to develop robust self review and appraisal systems, and improve the quality of programme planning, implementation and evaluation. Further support is required in these areas.

The Review Findings

Teachers are welcoming and inclusive of all children and their whānau. Children's cultural backgrounds are visible in the environment and they demonstrate a strong sense of belonging in the centre. They transition well into the centre and on to school.

Over the past 18 months, staff have focused their attention on establishing systems and practices that are appropriate for the new roll numbers, staff and learning environments. A practice manager, who has extensive teaching and leadership experience, has recently been employed to raise the quality of teaching practice and learning outcomes for children.

The early childhood manager has identified areas that require improvement and teachers have had many opportunities to build their professional knowledge and the quality of teaching. While there have been robust discussions, there has been minimal improvement to date.

Further development is needed to make teachers' interactions with children more meaningful and useful and to help increase the complexity of child-led learning. Effective assessment, programme planning and evaluation processes are yet to be established.

Good basic self-review processes have recently been implemented and involve the whole early childhood team, including the early childhood manager and practice leader. Teachers require urgent support to improve their use of internal evaluation to lift the quality of their provision for children.

A challenge is for governance, management and leadership roles and practices to be formalised and implemented in a way that results in continuous improvement.

Key Next Steps

Priorities for centre development include establishing:

  • a robust appraisal system and individual teacher development plans to improve professional knowledge and practice and to support the implementation of new learning
  • effective governance and leadership approaches that engage the team in developing an organisational culture of ongoing improvement
  • curriculum planning, implementation and evaluation that reflects the centre's philosophy, the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and contributes to consistently good quality provision for children's learning
  • systematic and responsive internal evaluation that uses indicators of high quality practice and results in ongoing improvement. 

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Mangere East Family Service Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to: 

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration. 

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to management and curriculum. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • regular, improvement focused internal evaluation and teacher performance appraisal
  • curriculum practices that reflect the curriculum framework and knowledge of relevant theories and practices in early childhood education

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, C1,2,3,4,7, GMA6,7; Education (ECS) Regulations 2008, 43(1a)

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service consult with the Ministry of Education and plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Mangere East Family Service Centre will be within two years.

Violet Tu’uga Stevenson

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

8 September 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

LocationMangere East, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number25301
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for75 children, including up to 15 aged under 2
Service roll75
Gender compositionGirls, 43, Boys 32
Ethnic compositionMāori 
Pākehā 
Tongan 
Fiji Indian
Samoan
Cook Island Māori
Niue
33
1
18

8
6
1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:5Meets minimum requirements
Over 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteJuly 2017
Date of this report8 September 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewFebruary 2014
Education ReviewFebruary 2011
Education ReviewDecember 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.