107 Centennial Park Road, Wellsford
View on mapWellsford Preschool Education Centre
Wellsford Preschool Education Centre
Akarangi | Quality Evaluations evaluate the extent to which early childhood services have the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most and Early Childhood Education (ECE) Improvement Framework (teacher led services) are the basis for making judgements about the quality of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Evaluations for improvement | Ngā Aronga Whai Hua is integrated across all of the above domains.
Wellsford Preschool Education Centre - 24/06/2016
1 Evaluation of Wellsford Preschool Education Centre
How well placed is Wellsford Preschool Education Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Wellsford Preschool Education Centre is a well-established privately owned all day service. In 2015 it moved to new purpose-built premises within the township of Wellsford. The centre has increased its licence from 25 to 50 children, with up to eight children under the age of two.
The centre philosophy supports children playing and learning in a homelike environment that offers a programme that reflects the aspirations of parents and whānau.
The centre has a history of positive ERO reviews. Good practices identified in previous ERO reports continue to be evident, and centre leaders have made good progress in improving strategic planning and self-review processes.
The Review Findings
Children benefit from positive relationships with staff and other children. Teachers are respectful of children. They are caring and attentive to their requests and needs. Teachers often work at children's levels, engaging them in conversations and making good use of questioning to extend their thinking, language and interests. They encourage children to lead their own play and support them to access resources.
The new centre is spacious and well resourced. There are many opportunities for the older children to engage in physical activity. They move freely between the indoor and outdoor areas. Resources are well organised enabling children to sustain their play for long periods of time. Infants and toddlers have a separate well-resourced room and outdoor deck area.
The programme allows for long periods of uninterrupted play. Teachers support children who engage in imaginative play with additional resources. Children are eager participants in the brief mat times. Meal times are social occasions where children learn social skills and self-help skills. Teachers sit with children for meals and promote conversations.
Infants and toddlers benefit from having an allocated primary caregiver that communicates regularly with their parents/whanau. The primary caregiver approach helps to ensure that each child is able to follow their individual routines while at the centre. Teachers provide many language learning opportunities for infants and toddlers.
Teachers plan for group interests and set up activities to promote children's learning through these interests. They record individual children's learning and interests in portfolios. They could now consider ways to more consistently document how they support the learning and interests of each child.
Children with special needs are well catered for. Teachers and teacher aides receive appropriate professional development so that they can best support these children and the families. Staff work with the local schools to support smooth transitions to school.
The centre continues to be well led. The move to the new centre and the growth in the centre roll and staffing were well managed. Managers have ensured that the staff continue to work effectively as a team. The home-like atmosphere has been maintained. Staff are encouraged and supported to take leadership roles. Policies are kept up-to-date and self review has been strengthened with a focus on ongoing improvement.
Key Next Steps
Centre managers agree that the centre should continue to strengthen:
-
programme planning, by documenting how teachers support individual children's interests and dispositions
-
strategic planning, by developing specific improvement goals, and supporting staff to monitor progress towards those goals
-
staff appraisal practices, by helping staff develop specific and measureable goals and getting feedback on the extent to which those goals are achieved
-
the use of te reo Māori within the programme and teachers' knowledge of tikanga Maori.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Wellsford Preschool Education Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Wellsford Preschool Education Centre will be in three years.
Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern
24 June 2016
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Wellsford, Northland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
25269 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
50 children, including up to 8 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
57 |
||
Gender composition |
Boys 37 Girls 20 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori Pākehā Pacific Chinese Filipino |
14 38 3 1 1 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:4 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:10 |
Meets minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
May 2016 |
||
Date of this report |
24 June 2016 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s)
|
Education Review |
June 2013 |
|
Education Review |
April 2010 |
||
Education Review |
May 2007 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Wellsford Preschool Education Centre - 03/02/2021
1 ERO’s Judgements
Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama- indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most (PDF 3.01MB) are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. The Akarangi Quality Evaluation Judgement Rubric (PDF 91.30KB) derived from the indicators, is used to inform the ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. Information about Akarangi | Quality Evaluations can be found here.
ERO’s judgements for Wellsford Preschool Education Centre are as follows:
Outcome Indicators |
ERO’s judgement |
What the service knows about outcomes for learners |
Whāngai Establishing |
Ngā Akatoro Domains |
ERO’s judgement |
He Whāriki Motuhake The learner and their learning |
Whāngai Establishing |
Whakangungu Ngaio Collaborative professional learning builds knowledge and capability |
Whāngai Establishing |
Ngā Aronga Whai Hua Evaluation for improvement |
Whakatō Emerging |
Kaihautū Leaders foster collaboration and improvement |
Whakaū Embedding |
Te Whakaruruhau Stewardship through effective governance and management |
Whāngai Establishing |
2 Context of the Service
Wellsford Preschool Education Centre is a privately owned and operated service in the rural community of Wellsford. Twenty percent of children enrolled are Māori. Small numbers of children from diverse ethnic groups attend the service.
The service provider, who is also the manager, is responsible for daily operations. There are seven qualified and four unqualified teachers.
ERO’s 2017 report identified the need to strengthen the documentation of curriculum planning and teacher appraisal. Some progress is evident in these areas.
3 Summary of findings
Children have opportunities to explore and participate in a wide range of learning experiences. They experience positive relationships with their peers and are encouraged to take responsibility for themselves and the wellbeing of others. Infants and toddlers benefit from engaging and responsive interactions with their teachers.
Teachers thoughtfully resource the learning environment to encourage children’s thinking and creativity. They provide good opportunities for children to explore and care for their natural world. Children are well supported as they settle into the service and then move onto school. The manager proactively seeks support for children with additional needs through liaison with external agencies.
Teachers have established positive relationships with parents. They could now prioritise working more closely with families in ways that focus on children’s learning. Teachers could also improve assessment records by increasingly making links with the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.
The manager and teachers have created a positive and enthusiastic working environment. This has resulted in long-serving staff who are beginning to lead shifts in practice based on their individual strengths. Professional development has also contributed to teachers’ knowledge and thinking about ways to improve their teaching practice. Evaluating the impact of improved practices on outcomes for learners could assist teachers to sustain these improvements.
Leaders and teachers are developing a philosophy that shows their values and beliefs about how children learn. Opportunities for teachers to share leadership responsibilities are being explored. Systems and processes to guide service operations are established. Developing and evaluating long-term goals could help the team to document their priorities for children’s learning, monitor the effectiveness of operational systems and to progress their overall strategic direction.
4 Improvement actions
Wellsford Preschool Education Centre will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:
-
sharing the knowledge and skills within the team to increase the collective use of te reo Māori and integration of tikanga Māori in the curriculum
-
establishing a process for internal evaluation that focuses on outcomes for learners
-
developing and evaluating long-term goals to monitor and improve the effectiveness of systems and teaching practices.
5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Wellsford Preschool Education Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
-
curriculum
-
premises and facilities
-
health and safety practices
-
governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
6 Compliance
Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances relating to:
- gaining written authority from parents for the administration of medicines to children (HS28)
- implementing a process that consistently meets all aspects of safety checking requirements (GMA7A)
- having an annual plan that identifies ‘who’ in relation to key tasks undertaken each year (GMA8).
Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki
3 February 2021
About the Early Childhood Service
Early Childhood Service Name |
Wellsford Preschool Education Centre |
Profile Number |
25269 |
Location |
Wellsford |
Service type |
Education and care service |
Number licensed for |
50 children, including up to 8 aged under 2. |
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80%+ |
Service roll |
79 |
Ethnic composition |
Māori 17 |
Review team on site |
October 2020 |
Date of this report |
3 February 2021 |
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review June 2016 |