76 Dundale Avenue, Blockhouse Bay, Auckland
View on mapBlockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten
1 ERO’s Judgements
Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.
ERO’s judgements for Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten are as follows:
Outcome Indicators(What the service knows about outcomes for learners) | Whāngai Establishing |
Ngā Akatoro Domains | |
Learning ConditionsOrganisational Conditions | Whāngai Establishing Whāngai Establishing |
2 Context of the Service
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten is adjacent to the Blockhouse Bay Community Church. A governing board supports a qualified centre manager, who leads a team of teachers and support staff. More than a quarter of children attending are of Māori or Pacific heritages. A long-serving team reflects the cultural diversity of these learners.
3 Summary of findings
Children, parents and whānau contribute to a curriculum that recognises children’s languages, cultures and learner identities. These are promoted through experiences, displays and resources in the learning environment. Ongoing connections between parents and teachers foster positive relationships. Recently gathered parent and whānau goals for their children’s learning are yet to be used to guide the curriculum.
Leaders and teachers have made some progress in strengthening the bicultural curriculum since ERO’s evaluation in 2019. Te reo Māori and tikanga Māori are valued, and aspects are integrated through the curriculum. Teachers continue to build their understanding of, and practice in these areas.
Teachers know children well. They use a range of intentional strategies when working with children who have additional needs. Children are given time and space to regulate emotions and complete tasks at their own pace. They make their own decisions in play. Children’s independence is promoted.
Teachers are currently evaluating how clearly assessment for learning shows children’s developing abilities and ways of learning. They are beginning to identify the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, in assessment. Intentional planning in response to this learning requires strengthening and documenting, to promote continuity and progress of children’s learning over time.
The service’s process for internal evaluation is yet to be fully implemented. A shared understanding of effective evaluation is not established across the teaching team. A more deliberate focus is needed on the difference they intend to make for children alongside indicators of intended high-quality practices, and using these to measure the success of changes they make to their teaching practice.
The learning and wellbeing of children in the context of whānau relationships are the primary considerations in decision making by the board and management. Teachers have many opportunities to attend professional learning and work collaboratively to develop their knowledge.
4 Improvement actions
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:
- More intentionally plan the curriculum so that parents’ goals for their children are progressed and children’s learning is deliberately extended.
- Strengthen the use of the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki through assessment to show the growth of children’s learning over time and support evaluation of the curriculum.
- Build shared understanding of the difference between self-review and effective evaluation to promote deeper critical reflection on practice and a clearer focus on the difference being made for children through changes to teaching.
5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
- relevant evacuation procedures and practices.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
6 Actions for Compliance
Since ERO’s onsite review, the service has now addressed the following area of non-compliance:
- Ensuring daily checks to equipment, premises, and facilities daily for hazards to the children include cleaning agents, medicine, poisons, hazards present in laundry facilities, vandalism, dangerous objects, foreign materials, and the placement of learning, play and other equipment.
Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS12.
Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)
4 September 2024
7 About the Early Childhood Service
Early Childhood Service Name | Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten |
Profile Number | 20563 |
Location | Blockhouse Bay, Auckland |
Service type | Education and care service |
Number licensed for | 50 children aged 2 and over |
Percentage of qualified teachers | 100% |
Service roll | 45 |
Review team on site | June 2024 |
Date of this report | 4 September 2024 |
Most recent ERO report(s) | Education Review, April 2019; Education Review, June 2014 |
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten
1 Evaluation of Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten
How well placed is Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed | Requires further development | Well placed | Very well placed |
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten is very well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten, located adjacent to the Blockhouse Bay Community Church, provides sessional and full-day education and care for children over two years of age. Families who attend the centre are from the local, culturally diverse area. The largest groups of children are Indian, Chinese and those with Pacific heritage.
The governing board is made up of members of the church, staff and parents. It has recently appointed a new centre manager to replace the long-serving manager, who retired in mid-2018. All teachers hold full teacher practising certificates. Many of the staff speak more than one language, and some are able to speak with children and their families in their home languages.
The centre has a positive reporting history with ERO. Since the 2014 ERO review there have been improvements to the learning environments and teachers have strengthened their bicultural practices, assessment and planning. The centre continues to focus on providing support for families and the local community, enacting the church's philosophy of service.
The Review Findings
Children benefit from an inclusive environment, and positive, respectful relationships with their teachers. They are familiar with centre routines and expectations, and are well supported to develop appropriate social skills. Children grow in confidence to negotiate and problem solve. Teachers' thoughtful interactions support children's sense of wellbeing and their learning.
Children's learning is well supported during long periods of uninterrupted play. They are able to make decisions about their work and often engage in group play scenarios. This play sometimes leads to more complex and cooperative play. Literacy, numeracy, science and technology concepts are promoted within the context of play. Children have good opportunities to be creative and engage in imaginative play.
Teachers' programme planning is highly responsive to children's strengths, interests or particular learning needs. It involves deliberate decision making about priorities for children's learning. Teachers meet daily to discuss individual children's learning and evaluate the programme. Together they develop a good knowledge of each child that influences their planning.
Teachers have established strong partnerships with whānau. Whānau are welcome at the centre and teachers make time to talk with them about children's wellbeing and learning. Parents learn about and contribute to their children's assessment and planning through face-to-face discussion and through online portfolios.
Information that parents share with teachers about children's home cultures has a positive impact on the culture of the centre. Teachers explain to parents how they support children to learn in literacy and numeracy and in other areas of the curriculum.
Teachers manage children's transitions into the centre and to school very well. They encourage parents of new children to be at the centre while their children settle. Teachers also support parents to understand the process of preparing children to move confidently on to school.
The staff work well together as a team and are committed to ongoing improvement. They make good use of internal evaluation to monitor the quality and effectiveness of centre operations and to guide decision making and strategic planning. Internal evaluation would be strengthened by clarifying the questions that guide each review. Strategic planning goals could be more clearly defined and used to monitor progress towards those goals.
Teacher are very well supported to improve their professional practice. They often engage in whole-staff professional learning and development. A strong and effective appraisal process is in place, and there are opportunities for teachers to learn from each other. All staff are encouraged and supported to take leadership roles.
The manager provides very effective leadership. There are good management systems in place. She works effectively with the chairperson of the governing board. A comprehensive framework of up-to-date policies and procedures guides centre operations.
Key Next Steps
Centre leaders and staff agree that they could continue to strengthen the extent to which bicultural practices are integrated throughout the curriculum.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services Northern
Northern Region
18 April 2019
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location | Blockhouse Bay, Auckland | ||
Ministry of Education profile number | 20563 | ||
Licence type | Education & Care Service | ||
Licensed under | Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 | ||
Number licensed for | 50 children aged over 2 years | ||
Service roll | 58 | ||
Gender composition | Girls 36 Boys 22 | ||
Ethnic composition | Māori Pākehā Indian Chinese Pacific groups other ethnic groups | 3 7 24 13 9 2 | |
Percentage of qualified teachers | 80% + | ||
Reported ratios of staff to children | Over 2 | 1:10 | Meets minimum requirements |
Review team on site | February 2019 | ||
Date of this report | 18 April 2019 | ||
Most recent ERO report(s)
| Education Review | June 2014 | |
Education Review | April 2011 | ||
Education Review | February 2008 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed
- Well placed
- Requires further development
- Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten
1 Evaluation of Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten
How well placed is Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed | Requires further development | Well placed | Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten is a well established centre, located in the grounds of the Blockhouse Bay Community Church. It provides sessional and full day education and care for children over two years. The centre has a positive reporting history with ERO. Families in the centre are from a variety of cultural and ethnic groups. The centre has effective management practices and there is very good partnership with parents/whānau.
The centre is well staffed with a manager, fully registered teachers and one administrator. There is a high adult to child ratio. Since the 2011 ERO review the indoor environment has been refurbished and the outdoors upgraded. The centre manager and teachers have strengthened self review and developed improved strategies for extending children’s interests. Good community relationships continue to be a strength. The centre offers parenting courses for families and helps them to access social support services when needed. Sessions are now available for two and a half year old children and, at the time of this 2014 review, there was one child under three years of age enrolled.
The Review Findings
The centre’s philosophy underpins the high quality, child led programme. The curriculum reflects the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum and well integrated Christian values. Teachers have a genuine commitment to being inclusive and to developing a more bicultural curriculum. Teachers affirm and build on the children’s strengths. Attractively presented assessment and planning documents shows how children’s group and individual interests shape the programme. Children’s portfolios are highly valued and show the development of children’s interests and learning.
Teachers have high expectations, interact skilfully and sustain conversations with children. This contributes to children being confident, capable learners. Children have good opportunities to experience meaningful literacy, numeracy, and science activities. Children play cooperatively, have leadership opportunities and show empathy for others. Teachers successfully foster children’s social competence and their communication and problem solving skills. Children have fun as they make discoveries and learn through purposeful play.
Respectful and trusting relationships between teachers and families contribute to the sense of community in the centre. Teachers are culturally responsive. They celebrate children’s cultural diversity, use home languages and affirm children’s cultural identities. Teachers actively encourage parent and whānau partnership in children’s learning and development. Parents/ whānau are kept well informed and are encouraged to share their knowledge and ideas. The centre has strong connections with the local community and schools. Children’s transition into the centre and on to school is well supported.
Children learn in a vibrant well resourced learning environment. This supports their sustained engagement in play. Children have very good opportunities to explore and be physically active in the spacious outdoor area. They engage in complex imaginative play and are able to be creative through an extensive variety of art, dance, and music activities. They are capable, confident learners.
Self review is robust, child focused, and used as a basis for improvements. Clear strategic goals, aligned to the centre vision statement and centre philosophy, are clearly outlined in annual plans. Rigorous performance management promotes high quality teaching practices and leadership opportunities.
Strong professional leadership enables the centre to maintain its focus on providing high quality early childhood education and care. Positive working relationships, mentoring and collaboration between management and staff help create a culture of trust and respect. The centre is governed effectively by a management committee that includes parents, church representatives and some centre personnel. There is effective record keeping, professional discussion and a comprehensive framework of policies and procedures.
Key Next Steps
Centre managers identified some areas for ongoing development. These include continuing to:
- strengthen self review to maintain high quality teaching practices
- enhance the centre's bicultural curriculum.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Blockhouse Bay Christian Kindergarten will be in four years.
Dale Bailey
National Manager Review Services
Northern Region
3 June 2014
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location | Blockhouse Bay, Auckland | ||
Ministry of Education profile number | 20563 | ||
Licence type | Education & Care Service | ||
Licensed under | Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 | ||
Number licensed for | 50 children, including up to 0 aged under 2 | ||
Service roll | 54 | ||
Gender composition | Boys 26 Girls 28 | ||
Ethnic composition | NZ European/Pākehā Māori Indian Chinese Middle Eastern Niue Tongan Samoan Cook Island Māori Southeast Asia Other Asian | 6 1 27 8 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 | |
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80% Based on funding rates | 80% | ||
Reported ratios of staff to children | Over 2 | 1:10 | Meets minimum requirements |
Review team on site | April 2014 | ||
Date of this report | 3 June 2014 | ||
Most recent ERO report(s) | Education Review | April 2011 | |
Education Review | February 2008 | ||
Education Review | March 2005 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.