48 Cheval Drive, Glenfield, Auckland
View on mapLollipops North Harbour Kakapo
Lollipops North Harbour Kakapos - 19/12/2019
Here is the latest report for the Governing Organisation that this service is part of.
1 Evaluation of Lollipops North Harbour Kakapos
How well placed is Lollipops North Harbour Kakapos to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed | Requires further development | Well placed | Very well placed |
Lollipops North Harbour Kakapos is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Lollipops North Harbour Kakapos provides full-day education and care for 45 children over the age of two years. The centre operates in a converted house. Children are from diverse cultural backgrounds.
The centre was previously known as Kids Inn Preschool. It has been purchased by Evolve Education Group (EEG). Visiting personnel from EEG work with the centre manager and team leaders to support day-to-day operations, long-term planning and development projects.
The centre's philosophy promotes respectful, reciprocal and responsive relationships with children, their families and the wider community. Aspects of the Reggio Emilia approach are incorporated into the daily programme. Natural settings are maintained.
Key next steps identified in the 2016 report included increasing the integration of te reo and te ao Māori throughout the programme. There has been significant improvement in this area.
This review was part of a cluster of 10 reviews in the Evolve Education Group.
The Review Findings
Children and their families are warmly welcomed, experience positive relationships with their peers and adults, and develop a strong sense of belonging in the centre. Teachers recognise children's interests, strengths and abilities, and provide opportunities for them to develop self-help skills and to be independent.
Children are active learners and have opportunities for uninterrupted play in small or large groups. A project approach for children's learning enables them to explore and investigate areas of interest. Children are supported in their oral language skills and learn to negotiate, problem solve and work together. Science is a key feature of the curriculum.
Children's languages, cultures and identities are well supported. They are celebrated and affirmed for who they are and what they bring to their learning. Children's learning about aspects of the Treaty of Waitangi, te reo and te ao Māori, is thoughtfully woven throughout the programme. Teachers help children and families to celebrate differences. They are aware of individual needs and use appropriate strategies to support inclusion.
The learning environment is well resourced and organised to promote children's curiosity, playfulness and imagination. Children have opportunities to be creative and engage in meaningful learning that is recognised by responsive teachers. Teachers model respect for the environment. This helps children understand the importance of being guardians and carers of their natural surroundings.
Teachers are intentional in the way they recognise and respond to opportunities to engage in and extend children's learning. They plan programmes based on their observations of children. Individual planning supports children's identified learning dispositions and shows how well teachers know children as learners. Links to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, are noted in children's learning stories. Teachers could make learning more visible and strengthen curriculum evaluation by making explicit links to learning outcomes, current research and knowledge of relevant theories and practice in early childhood education.
Parents/whānau contributions and aspirations for their children are gathered in a variety of ways. Teachers are beginning to use this information to identify what parents/whānau value as important learning. Making it clear how parents' aspirations contribute to curriculum decisions would help to strengthen teachers' partnerships with parents.
An EEG framework of policies and procedures guides centre practices. This framework continues to be reviewed. Leaders have used EEG systems and templates effectively. An effective process for staff appraisal is well implemented and supported by targeted professional development.
EEG has established an effective process for centres to implement internal evaluation. A shared understanding of internal evaluation has contributed to ongoing improvements. Leaders could strengthen this process by using clear evaluative questions and indicators of best practice. Strategic and annual plans are aligned with the overall vision for EEG.
Key Next Steps
Key next steps include:
- continuing to strengthen curriculum evaluation making explicit links to learning outcomes for children
- continuing to strengthen partnerships with parents/whānau
- using clear evaluative questions and indicators to strengthen internal evaluation.
Evolve Education Group Senior Managers have agreed that key next steps include:
- ensuring the company's vision and values, goals and principles reflect the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi
- addressing staffing issues in some centres to ensure quality teaching practices are evident, promoting positive outcomes for all children and ensuring sustainability of quality practice
- reviewing how effectively the levels and quality of learning resources in centres promote collaboration amongst children and promote more complex thinking
- providing professional learning and development for leaders and teachers to ensure a deeper engagement with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Lollipops North Harbour Kakapos completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
To improve current practice, Evolve Education Group Senior Managers must take steps to ensure that health and safety policies and procedures are implemented rigorously across all services.
Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region - Te Tai Raki
19 December 2019
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location | Glenfield, Auckland | ||
Ministry of Education profile number | 20508 | ||
Licence type | Education & Care Service | ||
Licensed under | Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 | ||
Number licensed for | 45 children over two years of age | ||
Service roll | 49 | ||
Gender composition | Girls 25 Boys 24 | ||
Ethnic composition | NZ European/Pākehā Chinese other ethnic groups | 19 16 14 | |
Percentage of qualified teachers | 80% + | ||
Reported ratios of staff and children | Over 2 | 1:9 | Better than minimum requirements |
Review team on site | October 2019 | ||
Date of this report | 19 December 2019 | ||
Most recent ERO report(s)
| Education Review | October 2016 | |
Education Review | June 2013 | ||
Education Review | May 2010 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed
- Well placed
- Requires further development
- Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Kids Inn Preschool - 04/10/2016
1 Evaluation of Kids Inn Preschool
How well placed is Kids Inn Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Kids Inn Preschool is licensed to provide all day education and care for up to 45 children aged over two years. The service operates from a converted house opposite Kids Inn Nursery and Fantails. Children transition into this centre aged approximately three and a half years.
In December 2014 the service changed ownership and is now under the governance and management of Evolve Group 3 Ltd. A manager is responsible for the running of the centre and leads a team of five other qualified teachers, and one unqualified teacher. The cultural diversity of the community is reflected in the teaching team.
The philosophy of the service is underpinned by Te Whariki, the early childhood curriculum, and states the team's commitment to honouring the Treaty of Waitangi. The setting of an environment that is supportive, nurturing, and stimulating is seen as an important foundation in empowering children to become competent and capable learners. The Reggio Emilia philosophy influences the programme and the environment.
The 2013 ERO report noted that children were happy and settled, and enjoyed positive relationships with teachers. The reported commended the teachers' presentation of an attractive, stimulating environment. Successful processes for teacher development and self review had improved learning outcomes for children. These positive aspects are still evident.
Areas identified for ongoing development in the 2013 report were the portfolios of children's learning, teachers' responsiveness to parent aspirations and the language, culture and identity of all children, and bicultural practice. It was also suggested that teachers review programme routines. There have been positive developments in these areas.
The Review Findings
The centre's philosophy is highly evident in practice. Children settle well and engage themselves in the programme. They independently access carefully selected resources that allow them to engage in play using real utensils. They are confident and capable. Children know centre routines well.
Indoor and outdoor environments encourage wondering, critical thought and creativity. Teachers' understanding of the importance of play as a vehicle for learning is highly evident. Children's conversations and discussions encouraged, accepted and valued.
Teachers' relationships with children are sensitive, positive and responsive. They plan a programme based on observations of children's interests. Teachers take time to focus on listening to children and exploring the deeper meaning in conversations, and children's wonderings. They support children to research, and explore their own working theories about their views on life.
Some teachers converse with children in their home languages, supporting their sense of belonging and wellbeing. Te reo and tikanga Māori are evident in centre routines and some incidental conversations.
The programme moves at a considered pace to ensure children's continued involvement and provide opportunities for children to revisit, and possibly extend, their learning. Children are encouraged to actively care for themselves and others, centre pets, and their world. Literacy, mathematics, and learning about the natural world are included meaningfully in the context of children's play.
Parents who spoke with ERO expressed satisfaction with the service. In particular they felt well informed about their child's learning, centre events and developments. Flexible processes ensured successful transitions for individual children, and consistency in teaching teams supported children's wellbeing.
The centre is well managed. New owners continue to review and adapt management systems. The policy framework that guides centre practices is also being reviewed and refined to align with current legislation.
Teacher appraisal processes are robust. Managers provide numerous opportunities for teachers to attend professional learning opportunities. There is good support for leaders, and an organisational culture that supports ongoing improvement. Good strategic recruitments have been made to support improved programmes and quality outcomes for children.
Key Next Steps
Centre leaders agree that to enhance their current good practice teachers should strengthen their bicultural practice by:
-
increasing their use of te reo Māori throughout the programme
-
deepening their knowledge of te ao Māori and making this visible in centre programmes and documentation.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Kids Inn Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Kids Inn Preschool will be in three years.
Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern
4 October 2016
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Glenfield, Auckland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
20508 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
45 children, including up to 0 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
50 |
||
Gender composition |
Boys 32 Girls 18 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori Pākehā Chinese other |
2 27 15 6 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Over 2 |
1:8 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Review team on site |
July 2016 |
||
Date of this report |
4 October 2016 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s)
|
Education Review |
June 2013 |
|
Education Review |
May 2010 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.