28 Carrington Road, Mount Albert, Auckland
View on mapCollectively Kids Ltd
Collectively Kids Ltd
ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.
ERO’s Judgement
Regulatory standards | ERO’s judgement |
Curriculum | Meeting |
Premises and facilities | Meeting |
Health and safety | Meeting |
Governance, management and administration | Meeting |
Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.
Background
Collectively Kids Ltd is privately owned and operated. The service owner is responsible for daily operations, she leads a team of eight qualified teachers and two unqualified staff. At the time of the review almost 20 percent of enrolled children have Māori heritage.
Summary of Review Findings
The service curriculum is inclusive and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. It is language rich and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children are given the opportunity to develop their knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Teachers engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. They demonstrate understanding of children’s learning and development, and knowledge of relevant theories and practice in early childhood education.
The systems and practices for monitoring compliance need to be strengthened to ensure the regulatory standards are maintained.
Key Next Step
A key next step is to:
- Increase the opportunities provided to parents to communicate and be involved in decisions about their child’s learning.
Actions for Compliance
Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:
- Having a record of the checks made on the premises and facilities every day of operation that meets the full requirements of the criterion (HS12).
- Having records of excursions that include the method of transport and evidence of parental permission and approval of adult – child ratios for regular excursions (HS17).
- A record of written authority from parents for the administration and acknowledgement of medication in accordance with the requirement for the category of medication (HS28).
- Having a written procedure and documentation to guide safety checking (GMA7A).
- Maintaining accurate enrolment records for each child attending (GMA10).
Next ERO Review
The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.
Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)
29 January 2024
Information About the Service
Early Childhood Service Name | Collectively Kids Ltd |
Profile Number | 20478 |
Location | Mt Albert, Auckland |
Service type | Education and care service |
Number licensed for | 30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2 |
Percentage of qualified teachers | 100% |
Service roll | 40 |
Review team on site | November 2023 |
Date of this report | 29 January 2024 |
Most recent ERO report(s) | Education Review, June 2019; Education Review, July 2015 |
General Information about Assurance Reviews
All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.
Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.
ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:
- having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
- previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
- that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
- that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
- where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
- relevant evacuation procedures and practices.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:
- discussions with those involved in the service
- consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
- observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.
Collectively Kids Ltd - 04/06/2019
1 Evaluation of Collectively Kids Ltd
How well placed is Collectively Kids Ltd to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
Collectively Kids Ltd is very well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Collectively Kids Ltd is a well-established centre in Mount Albert. It is licensed to provide education and care for 30 children, including up to 10 under the age of two years. There are separate indoor and outdoor play spaces for the two age groups. An emphasis on children of all ages learning with and from each other, means that there are regular opportunities for them to mingle.
The centre has remained in the same ownership since it was established. The owner, team leader and head teacher work collaboratively to lead the centre. All teachers hold current practising certificates. An additional staff member supports teachers in working with children with additional learning needs.
The centre's vision, philosophy and goals are well articulated. An emphasis on environmental education, social justice and the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand underpins the play-based curriculum.
The 2015 ERO report noted very positive relationships and high levels of communication between children, parents and staff. Interactions were consistent and focused on children's wellbeing and learning. These positive features of the centre continue to be apparent. The 2015 report identified that teachers' next step was to continue increasing their focus in assessment portfolios on individual children's learning. Very good progress has been made in this regard.
The Review Findings
Children confidently lead their own learning in a well-resourced and presented environment. They make choices about what they want to do and who they will play with. They demonstrate care for each other and are keen to help. Children learn to take responsibility for themselves and have opportunities to be leaders. They are very well supported to develop social skills and to regulate their own behaviour and emotions. Children under the age of two receive very good quality care.
Teachers are skilled in the ways they work with children. They know children and their families well and consistently promote children's wellbeing and learning. They often read to children and provide very good support for language development. Teachers are inclusive and responsive to children's individual needs and preferences, and respect all children as competent and capable learners. Their interactions are underpinned by the concept of ako. Teachers and children learn from and with each other. There is evidence of children participating in tuakana/teina relationships. Parents and whānau are seen as an integral part of their children's learning.
The curriculum is well developed and reflects the centre's vision and philosophy. Priorities for children's learning are well articulated and observable in practice. Children have very good opportunities to contribute to caring for their local environment and to learn about global issues of sustainability. They experience an environment where te reo and tikanga Māori are interwoven in interactions, routines, rituals and documentation. Children learn about diversity, and consideration of others is fostered. Parents who spoke to ERO expressed their appreciation of what the centre offers their children.
Teachers implement effective planning and assessment processes. Records of children's learning are highly individualised. Parents are invited to contribute to the planning for their children. Parent aspirations are incorporated into children's individual learning goals. Very good provision for non-contact time enables teachers to plan for and record children's learning within the framework of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.
Curriculum projects and annual cultural events ensure that children benefit from rich and varied learning experiences. Centre leaders are now focusing on how they can strengthen the evaluation of curriculum plans to better evidence positive outcomes for children.
Centre operations are supported by well-established systems and processes. A comprehensive strategic plan guides centre development. Internal evaluation and teacher appraisal promote critical inquiry and help sustain continuous improvement. The owner encourages distributed leadership, and good use is made of mentors to strengthen professional practice. The current review of centre policies and procedures will help to enhance these sound foundations.
Key Next Steps
Centre leaders have identified appropriate key next steps for centre development, including:
-
continuing to strengthen the evaluation of curriculum planning
-
further developing the visual arts within the curriculum.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Collectively Kids Ltd completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services Northern
Northern Region
4 June 2019
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Mount Albert, Auckland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
20478 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
38 |
||
Gender composition |
Boys 21 Girls 17 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori |
1 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:5 |
Meets minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:8 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
April 2019 |
||
Date of this report |
4 June 2019 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
July 2015 |
|
Education Review |
August 2012 |
||
Education Review |
June 2009 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
-
Very well placed
-
Well placed
-
Requires further development
-
Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
Collectively Kids Ltd - 16/07/2015
1 Evaluation of Collectively Kids Ltd
How well placed is Collectively Kids Ltd to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Collectively Kids Ltd is licensed to provide education and care for 30 children, including 10 up to two years of age. The majority of children are NZ European/Pākehā. Eight Māori children and a small number from Samoan, Indian, Chinese, French, Russian and Irish backgrounds also attend. Teachers are ethnically diverse and are qualified and registered.
The service is well established. The owner provides a home-like service with well designed learning environments. Teachers maintain very positive relationships and there are high levels of communication between children, parents and centre staff. Interactions are consistent and focused on children's wellbeing and learning. The service has a strong focus on natural science, environmental responsibility and sustainable practices. Centre strategic plans show a focus on refining teaching and learning systems to increase the effectiveness of practice.
The 2012 ERO report noted the many positive practices that supported children’s all round development. These included high quality education and care practices, and skilful support to promote learning through play and to help children develop appropriate social relationships.
ERO also recommended staff improve planning documentation by strengthening links between centre documents and curriculum goals. It noted that self review could be further improved by more systematically collecting evaluated reflections and feedback to use in reviews. This report notes continued development in these areas, with teachers continuing to work collaboratively on developing planning, assessment and management documentation.
The Review Findings
Children are supported to become confident, articulate and socially adept. They are comfortable in their learning environment and are accepting of others. They enjoy a good sense of belonging and wellbeing and have strong relationships with caring teachers. Children’s positive attitudes to learning are evident. Older children display regard for the welfare of younger children. Children are self managing and take responsibility for the care of their learning environment. Teachers are aware of children’s individual rhythms for learning and work at the child’s pace.
Parents of children with diverse learning needs are enthusiastic about the inclusive and caring approach that teachers display when working with children. Families feel well supported.
The programme is stimulating and extends children’s learning. Opportunities are provided for mixed age play where older children support younger children. Children are actively supported by teachers to negotiate solutions to problems with their peers. Mathematics, literacy and science learning are evident in children’s individual portfolios. Children enjoy excursions into the local community where they learn about sustainable natural environments. Teachers and children explore topics and learn together.
The bicultural development of the centre has good foundations and continues to strengthen. Tikanga is being developed further and deeper connections are being established with the local Māori community. Children enjoy learning their mihi, engaging in powhiri, listening to traditional stories and singing waiata.
A broader understanding of the cultures of whānau continues to develop. Teachers survey parents to ask how they can further support children's home cultures. Staff come from a range of ethnic backgrounds and share aspects of their cultures in the programme. Parents also share their cultural knowledge and valued taonga/art pieces with the centre.
The centre owner is a leader in the centre. She is developing shared leadership roles amongst staff. Teachers have many opportunities to lead projects based on their interests and strengths. These reciprocal and respectful approaches underpin the positive relationships evident between staff.
Trusting relationships and learning partnerships have been established between parents and teachers. Partnerships have been developed particularly well with parents and whānau of children with special learning needs. Information is shared between the home, centre and support organisations. This means that children can receive high quality support. Parents appreciate the centre’s inclusive and welcoming environment where their children are valued and extended through learning experiences.
Key Next Steps
ERO and the owner/manager agree that teachers should continue to increase the extent to which there is a focus on individual children’s ongoing learning in their portfolios.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Collectively Kids Ltd completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
The owner and staff have recently shared and reviewed processes for maintaining the private and secure storage of children’s personal information.
Next ERO Review
When is ERO likely to review the service again?
The next ERO review of Collectively Kids Ltd will be in three years.
Dianne Moffitt
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)
16 July 2015
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Mt Albert, Auckland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
20478 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
46 |
||
Gender composition |
Girls 23 Boys 23 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori Pākehā Chinese French Russian Samoan Chinese/Māori Irish Samoan/Cook Island Maori |
8 27 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80% Based on funding rates |
80% |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:5 |
Meets minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:8 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
April 2015 |
||
Date of this report |
16 July 2015 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
August 2012 |
|
Education Review |
June 2009 |
||
Education Review |
September 2005 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
- Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
- Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
- Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
- Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.