BestStart Richmond Road

Education institution number:
20123
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
24
Telephone:
Address:

136 Richmond Road, Ponsonby, Auckland

View on map

First Steps Ponsonby - 28/10/2016

1 Evaluation of First Steps Ponsonby

How well placed is First Steps Ponsonby to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

First Steps Ponsonby is situated in a converted house in a residential area of Ponsonby. The BestStart Education and Care organisation provides the overarching structure and support for governance and management. A longstanding centre manager and two acting head teachers work closely with a BestStart Management team. All teachers are qualified and permanent.

This service is licensed for up to 41 children, with a maximum of 12 aged under two years. Families have diverse cultural backgrounds. The ground floor is organised into areas for infants and toddlers and for those aged two to four years. A downstairs area is assigned to children aged over four, who also have free access to an outside play space. Other children use this space at selected times.

The 2013 ERO report noted that the centre's curriculum was well designed with a strong focus on wellbeing, high quality relationships and a settled environment. Planning, assessment, evaluation and strategic planning were identified as areas for further development. Improved access to the outdoor space for younger children was also suggested. The centre continues to work on these next steps, along with reviewing the quality of the learning environment, and the programme for supporting children as they transition to school.

The Review Findings

Caring and trusting relationships between children, and with teachers, reflect a strong sense of belonging and wellbeing. Teachers are affirming, nurturing and warm. An inclusive atmosphere and a visible commitment to endorsing the culture, language and identity of each family is evident in programme, environment and practice. Te reo Māori is naturally integrated into the programme through conversation, waiata and karakia.

Children are engaged, happy and confident to explore the environment. Their interests and preferences guide their play, and they also learn through established care routines, which are respectfully and appropriately managed. Teachers promote literacy, mathematics, science and creative activities through the programme. Resources and materials are purposefully placed to encourage children's exploration and independence. Regular visits to a nearby park provide children with greater space and opportunity for learning. Managers continue to review the overall layout of the centre to ensure that children have equitable access to outdoor play.

Portfolios and interactive wall displays allow children to create and rearrange photos, pictures, words, and numbers and to revisit their past learning experiences. Teachers document children's key interests and activities in portfolios, which identify significant moments of learning for individuals and groups of children. In these documents, some teachers identify ways that they can support and extend learning in purposeful ways. This good practice could be extended for greater consistency in assessment, planning and teaching.

Families receive good information about the ways that children learn, in relation to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. The centre has initiated a primary caregiver approach that supports teachers to build strong, trusting relationships with infants and young toddlers and their families. The centre plans to create further ways to engage meaningfully with parents about children's learning and care. This development includes teachers supporting the growing numbers of children and their families who speak languages other than English at home.

Strategic goals are focused on improving centre operations and the curriculum. BestStart provides appropriate professional development. Managers value self review, and have identified key areas for improvement. Regular staff meetings highlight information about children's interests, strengths and dispositions for learning. Managers encourage teachers to use this information to review the effectiveness of teaching and to share good practices.

Self review could be enhanced by the use of clear indicators of effective practice to measure the impact of teaching practices on children's learning. The centre should also now prioritise a formal review of the quality of the programme and suitability of the environment in the downstairs area, to improve and extend teaching and learning for older children.

Key Next Steps

The centre manager has identified the need to strengthen teaching consistency and capability. BestStart managers also agree that next steps for this service include reviewing and improving:

  • the preschool environment and programme
  • the consistency and quality of teachers' interactions with children
  • assessment, so that teachers plan deliberate teaching strategies in the programme.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of First Steps Ponsonby completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of First Steps Ponsonby will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

28 October 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Ponsonby, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20123

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

41 children, including up to 12 aged under 2

Service roll

40

Gender composition

Girls 21 Boys 19

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Pacific

Indian

Asian

African

2

21

9

5

2

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2016

Date of this report

28 October 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

July 2013

Education Review

July 2010

Education Review

June 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

First Steps Ponsonby - 12/07/2013

1 Evaluation of First Steps Ponsonby

How well placed is First Steps Ponsonby to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

First Steps Ponsonby is an inner-city suburban centre that provides all-day education and care for up to 41 children, including 12 aged up to two years. The building is a road-front renovated house with distinct areas, including a central kitchen. The outdoor play area is accessed by steps on the side of the house. Young infants have their own space upstairs and toddlers are grouped next door to them. The older children have a well established preschool space downstairs.

The centre is part of Kidicorp Ltd and the company’s policies, procedures and practices underpin its operation. Business and professional support managers visit regularly to ensure that Kidicorp expectations are being met and to promote the ongoing development of the centre. A centre manager provides professional leadership for teaching and leadership teams.

Previous ERO reports have identified significant strengths in the centre, particularly in relation to the implementation of its philosophy. The centre has maintained its good practices and has responded positively to ERO’s recommendations and suggestions as part of its programme of continuous improvement.

The Review Findings

The centre’s philosophy is very well reflected in practice. Long-serving teachers have maintained a settled and calm environment in the centre. Their high quality relationships with children, parents and each other:

  • affirm children, support their well being and sense of belonging, and provide a sound foundation for their learning
  • result in high quality and suitable care and learning experiences for infants and toddlers
  • maintain and extend high levels of parental interest and involvement in the centre
  • create a respectful and trusting climate that facilitates teacher development and maximises the impact of Kidicorp support personnel on centre operations.

The centre’s curriculum is well designed to support children’s overall learning and development. Programmes clearly reflect New Zealand’s bicultural heritage, Auckland’s strong multicultural make-up, and the culture, languages and identities of Pacific children.

The curriculum provides appropriate opportunities for children to enjoy a range of play that encourages their participation and exploration, and enables them to follow and develop their individual interests. Daily programmes include:

  • well integrated early literacy, numeracy and science learning
  • well implemented transition processes for children new to the centre and those moving to different age-group areas within it
  • good opportunities for children to participate in the local and wider communities.

Programmes are well linked to what teachers notice about the interests and learning of children. Daily reflections on the programme are proving a useful means of following up these observations. Portfolios contain attractive records of children’s learning and development over time, and increasingly promote parent input.

The centre is very well managed and led. The centre manager is focused on extending the knowledge and practice of the teaching team. She and her head teachers model high quality teaching practices and work effectively with Kidicorp personnel to promote ongoing teacher development. Enhanced self-review processes are clearly resulting in ongoing improvements for children.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre managers agree that the centre should follow through on plans to:

  • improve toddlers’ access to the outdoor play environment, and extend the challenge for children in some of the outdoor play areas
  • continue to refine current assessment, evaluation and programme planning procedures to ensure assessment information is consistently built on over time
  • explore the feasibility and potential benefits of introducing primary caregivers for infants
  • extend self review to capture big picture findings and refine the documentation of self review so it is more manageable
  • refine strategic planning to provide a stronger direction for centre development.

Kidicorp should also consider refining its personnel policy and procedural documents to better reflect the company’s desire to exceed minimum requirements and achieve high quality outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of First Steps Ponsonby completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of First Steps Ponsonby will be in three years.

Dale Bailey National Manager Review Services Northern Region

12 July 2013

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Ponsonby, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20123

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

41 children, including up to 12 aged under 2

Service roll

44

Gender composition

Girls 27 Boys 17

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā

Samoan

Other

38

2

4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2013

Date of this report

12 July 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

July 2010

 

Education Review

June 2007

 

Education Review

June 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.