St Joseph's Catholic School (Te Aroha)

We maintain a regular review programme to evaluate and report on the education and care of young people in schools.

We are in the process of shifting from event-based external reviews to supporting each school in a process of continuous improvement.

There may be delays between reviews for some schools and kura due to Covid-19 and while we transition to our new way of reviewing.

Read more about our new processes and why we changed the way we review schools and kura.

Find out which schools have upcoming reviews.

School Context

St Joseph’s Catholic School (Te Aroha) is a small primary school located in the town of Te Aroha. It caters for students from Years 1 to 8. At the time of the review the roll was 96 students, including 10 who identify as Māori and 21 of Pacific heritage.

The school’s vision aims to ‘produce confident, knowledgeable young people who have a high level of understanding and feeling about what it is to be a Catholic in the 21st Century’. The key values of love, respect, justice, excellence, faith, joy, integrity and community underpin all aspects of learning and school organisation. The school’s Catholic character through its religious education programme and role modelling places priority on educating students about ‘the values and virtues of Jesus Christ, emphasizing his great love for mankind’.

The school’s strategic goals are based on improving the outcomes of all students through a values-based religious education. The key priorities are to support accelerated learning, specifically in literacy, for Māori and Pacific students. Also, to effectively use technologies to grow students’ independent learning, and to be culturally inclusive and provide equitable opportunities for all.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, school-wide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • reading, writing, mathematics.

There have been some changes to the board of trustees since the 2016 ERO review. The principal is long-standing at the school. There have been several changes in teaching staff.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The school can show equitable outcomes for its Māori and Pākehā students in reading and writing. However, there are not equitable outcomes for Pacific students and boys.

Achievement data in reading, writing and mathematics shows that a large majority of students are achieving at or above expected levels, including Māori students. This information also shows that less than half of Pacific students achieve well in relation to curriculum expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. These levels have significantly decreased over the last three years. Boys achieve proportionality lower than girls in mathematics, and this disparity is significant in reading and writing.  

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school is able to show some acceleration for Māori and other students who need this. Analysis of school achievement information shows that students that entered at Year 1 below expected levels and left the school in Year 8, made accelerated progress in reading, writing and mathematics.

In 2018, the school targeted all students who were below curriculum expectation in mathematics, and all these of the students made accelerated progress.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Rich and diverse experiences across the curriculum promote student participation and extend students confidence in learning. A wide range of achievement information is gathered and collated to inform programmes for learning. Teachers nurture constructive learning relationships to grow students’ independence and self management as capable learners. Calm and settled learning environments support students to know and understand the expectations for learning and behaviour. High levels of student engagement and willingness to participate in opportunities strengthens their sense of belonging and motivation to learn.

A well-considered approach to school-wide improvement of teaching practice is evident. There is a wide range of leadership opportunities for teachers to grow and extend their knowledge and experience. Leaders and teachers have regular professional discussions that support inquiry and shared understandings of responsive practice. Personalised mentoring and induction programmes for new and beginning teachers provide clarity and expectations for teaching at this school.

Parents and families are welcomed and actively involved in all aspects of school events, trips and celebrations. Trustees’ actively represent their community and bring a wide range of expertise to their roles. The school uses a comprehensive range of strategies and initiatives to strengthen connections and extend relationships with families. The strong partnership with the parish enhances and extends student knowledge and understanding of the Catholic faith. A range of leadership opportunities across the school support students to develop confidence in themselves and their skills.

Learners with additional needs experience a collaborative approach that supports progress, achievement and wellbeing. Individual education plans are developed for students with high needs, alongside expert agencies and families. There is a clear approach to tracking and monitoring of all students progress and achievement. Leaders and teachers know their students pastoral needs well. Respectful and trusting relationships between teachers and students empower them to fully participate in the life of the school.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

There is a need to implement a more targeted approach to accelerate the achievement of at-risk students. This should include:

  • reframing the annual targets to include all students whose learning requires acceleration

  • regularly reporting to the board on the progress of targeted students.

There is an urgent need to implement processes to respond to low levels of achievement for Pacific students. Priority should be given to building knowledge about culturally responsive practice for Pacific students and their families. This includes ensuring students’ languages, cultures and identities are visible and used for authentic contexts for learning.

Leaders should also prioritise evaluating the impact of programmes and initiatives designed to accelerate achievement to ensure they are effectively addressing the needs of at-risk learners.

3 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

4 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of St Joseph’s Catholic School (Te Aroha)’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO’s Framework: Overall School Performance is available on ERO’s website.

5 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • rich and diverse experiences across the curriculum that support student outcomes

  • a well considered collaborative approach to school wide improvement that focuses on the building of teacher capability

  • a collaborative approach that supports the progress, achievement and wellbeing of students with additional needs

  • community partnerships that welcome parents and families and actively involve them in the school.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • the effective use of targets and achievement information to identify and accelerate learning for those at-risk students

  • culturally responsive practice to accelerate and respond to Māori and Pacific students
  • internal evaluation of programmes and initiatives to inform ongoing school-wide improvement.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified non-compliance in relation to safety checking of new employees.

In order to address this, the board of trustees must:

  • ensure procedures and practices to appoint personnel are in line with safety checking requirements [Children’s Act 2014].

Areas for improved compliance practice

To improve current practice, the board of trustees should:

  • ensure robust and ongoing review and updating of policies, procedures and ensure in-committee minutes appropriately follow, reflect and record the process to meet legislative requirements and are implemented school wide.

ERO recommends that the school seek support from New Zealand School Trustees Association (NZSTA) in order to bring about improvements in:

  • knowledge and understanding of effective stewardship roles and responsibilities.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services

Central Region

30 July 2019

About the school

Location

Te Aroha

Ministry of Education profile number

1952

School type

Full Primary (Year 1 to 8)

School roll

96

Gender composition

Female 48 Male 48

Ethnic composition

Māori 10
NZ European/Pākehā 51
Tongan 14
Samoan 7
Other 14

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

Yes

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

May 2019

Date of this report

30 July 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review June 2016
Education Review October 2011
Education Review August 2008

1 Context

St Joseph's Catholic School (Te Aroha) is located in the centre of the east Waikato township of Te Aroha. It is an integrated full primary school catering for students in Years 1 to 8. The school's 2016 professional development focus on learner agency is a part of the school's goal to facilitate modern learning practices. The school's special Catholic character underpins the family-oriented philosophy and the positive relationships with students, whānau, the parish and wider community.

2 Equity and excellence

The vision and valued outcomes defined by the school for all children are to promote love, excellence, faith, joy, respect, justice, integrity and community. This includes a focus on producing confident, knowledgeable young people who have a high level of understanding about what it is to be a Catholic in the 21st century.

The school’s achievement information shows that oe past Māori students and riting. Mathematics results demonstrated overall improvement from previous years.ver ththree years, a significant number ofhave achieved at or above National Standards in readingw

Nevertheless, at the end of 2015, 14 out of 48 boys, including a small number of Māori children, were yet to achieve National Standards in reading and mathematics. In writing, 21 boys were achieving below National Standards.

Students at risk of not achieving their expected levels are known and their needs understood by classroom teachers and senior management.

Since the previous ERO review teachers have implemented a wide range of initiatives. These include:

  • introducing formal processes for the assessment, planning and teaching of oral language programmes
  • engaging in professional development to improve assessment moderation in writing
  • improving literacy and mathematics teaching
  • undertaking science professional development in order to introduce learning programmes of particular interest to boys
  • providing teacher-aide training in English language learning.

In 2016 school leaders introduced the PaCT (progress and achievement consistency tool) which is being used to improve the consistency of overall teacher judgements in relation to the National Standards. Teacher training in the use of this tool has contributed to a sharper focus on the learning needs of those Māori, Pacific and other students who have yet to achieve National Standards.

3 Accelerating achievement

How effectively does this school respond to children whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

The school has a clear focus on accelerating student achievement. Teachers use well-developed and suitable assessment processes to identify the learning needs and next steps of all children including Māori and Pacific students. Through close monitoring and focused support, all students, including Māori and Pacific, are expected to achieve National Standards by the end of Year 8 or sooner.

School-wide and teacher tracking of individual progress and achievement over time shows that children who enter the school with low levels of literacy and mathematics achievement make accelerated progress.

The school has a detailed action plan for maintaining a focus on accelerating the progress of boys who are at risk of not achieving National Standards.

4 School conditions

How effectively do the school’s curriculum and other organisational processes and practices develop and enact the school’s vision, values, goals and priorities for equity and excellence?

The school's commitment to equity and excellence for Māori, Pacific and all learners is demonstrated by:

  • an unrelenting focus on raising achievement for Māori, Pacific and other groups of learners in reading, writing and mathematics
  • explicitly promoting the school's Catholic values within a positive pastoral care and learning culture
  • maintaining high expectations for learning and behaviour
  • engaging parents/whānau as partners in their children's learning and progress
  • implementing processes for internal inquiry and evaluation
  • promoting opportunities for conversations with other schools and education networks.

The curriculum is collaboratively designed by staff in association with the wider school community and is systematically reviewed. Te reo Māori and cultural inclusiveness are promoted through a Māori language implementation plan, religious education programmes and the arts. An experienced teacher is a role model for teaching and promoting the inclusion of te reo and tikanga Māori in classroom programmes. School leaders are exploring possibilities for teaching a foreign language at Years 7 and 8.

Teachers know students, families and whānau well. They use a range of varied teaching strategies, including digital tools, to engage students in learning. Strategies for promoting student self and peer assessment are developing across the school. These need to be strengthened by the school-wide focus on learner agency this year.

Parents and whānau appreciate the school's open door policy and the availability of the principal and teachers for discussions about learning and wellbeing.

The principal, deputy principal and special education needs coordinator use a collaborative and investigative approach to implementing new initiatives. This promotes a climate of professional dialogue, trust, and builds teacher capacity in accelerating and extending student achievement.

The current appraisal process is being reviewed and further refined. These changes should continue to develop teachers' capacity to accelerate progress for students who are at-risk of poor educational outcomes and be more closely aligned to the charter-targeted students.

The board regularly evaluates the effectiveness of its own performance, scrutinises school data and the work of the school in achieving valued student outcomes. Trustees respond to regular reports on student achievement and make evidence-based decisions about resourcing.

5 Going forward

How well placed is the school to achieve and sustain equitable and excellent outcomes for all children?

Leaders and teachers:

  • know the children whose learning and achievement need to be accelerated
  • respond effectively to the strengths, needs and interests of each child
  • regularly evaluate how well teaching is working for these children
  • act on what they know works well for each child
  • build teacher capability effectively to achieve equitable outcomes for all children
  • are well placed to achieve and sustain equitable and excellent outcomes for all children.

Through strong stewardship and professional leadership St Joseph's Catholic School (Te Aroha) has maintained the positive findings of ERO's previous 2011 report and continued its focus on improving all children's progress and achievement. All children, particularly Māori and Pacific are well engaged in learning and appreciate the school's friendly, positive learning culture.

In continuing to develop its capacity to accelerate progress for students who are at risk of poor education outcomes, the school's next step is to streamline its focus on these students by:

  • more effectively sharpening annual target-setting to focus on these specific groups of priority learners
  • setting and monitoring more specific targets within class programmes to accelerate the progress of individual students through the year
  • continuing to develop strategies and indicators that assist self and peer assessment
  • more specifically aligning the school-wide teaching as inquiry processes with the board's targets for at-risk students.

In order to continue to further promote students' awareness of their language, culture and identity, consideration should now be given to using internal expertise to increase the use of Māori language throughout the school and more explicitly feature Māori, Pacific and Asian perspectives and culture in the school curriculum environment.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

6 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and Self Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • Board administration.

  • Curriculum.

  • Management of health, safety and welfare.

  • Personnel management.

  • Asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • Emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment).

  • Physical safety of students.

  • Teacher registration.

  • Processes for appointing staff.

  • Stand down, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions.

  • Attendance.

  • Compliance with the provisions of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

7 Recommendations

School leaders need to:

  • work alongside teachers to continue to strengthen specific targets for priority learners within class-room programmes and alignment to the teaching as inquiry process as referred to in the Going Forward section of this report
  • provide guidance and support for teachers to enable them to accelerate the progress and achievement of students at risk, particularly boys. 

Lynda Pura-Watson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

28 June 2016

About the school

Location

Te Aroha

Ministry of Education profile number

1952

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

89

Gender composition

Boys 47 Girls 42

Ethnic composition

Pākehā

Māori

Tongan

Samoan

South East Asian

Other Asian

Other European

Other

41

13

10

6

6

5

5

3

Review team on site

February 2016

Date of this report

28 June 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

October 2011

August 2008

August 2005