Smart Start Preschool

Education institution number:
10416
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
42
Telephone:
Address:

63 Station Road, Kamo, Whangarei

View on map

Smart Start Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Not meeting

Health and safety

Not meeting

Governance, management and administration

Not meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified areas of non-compliance with regulatory standards that are an unacceptable risk to children.

Background

Smart Start Preschool provides for children from infants to school age in two separate houses. The owner is responsible for governance of the service, and also works alongside the teaching team to support centre operations. Approximately half of the children enrolled are Māori.

Summary of Review Findings

Teachers providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences.

The curriculum is inclusive, and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Children are provided with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development, both indoors and outdoors, individually and in groups. A language-rich environment supports children’s learning.

Consistent implementation of health and safety, premises and facilities and governance and administration practices is required to meet regulatory standards.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • ensuring there are sufficient spaces for equipment and material to be stored safely, including that stored equipment and materials can be easily and safely accessed by adults and where practicable, by children

  • ensuring the first aid kit complies with licensing requirements

  • ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury are secured

  • having a record of time each child attending the service sleeps, and checks made by adults during that time

  • ensuring equipment, premises and facilities are checked on every day of operation for hazards to children; consideration of hazards must include cleaning agents, medicines, poisons, and other hazardous material, electrical sockets and appliances, the condition and placement of learning, play and other equipment, vandalism, dangerous objects, and foreign materials (e.g. broken glass)

  • having a record of all medicine (prescription and non-prescription) given to children attending the service, that includes the name and amount of medicine given and the time medicine was administered

  • having a process for human resource management that includes a system of regular appraisal of staff

  • ensuring all children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014

  • having an annual budget setting out the service’s estimated revenue and expenses that includes professional development costs

  • having an attendance record that meets the requirements outlined in the Early Childhood Education Funding Handbook.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF8, PF28, HS6, HS9, HS12, HS28, GMA7, GMA7A, GMA9, GMA11].

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence issued to this service provider. ERO will not undertake a further review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets regulatory standards.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Filivaifale Jason Swann
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki
15 February 2023 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Smart Start Preschool

Profile Number

10416

Location

Kamo, Whangarei

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

40 children including 10 under 2 years

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

47

Review team on site

December 2022

Date of this report

15 February 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, August 2018; Education Review, October 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Smart Start Preschool - 14/08/2018

1 Evaluation of Smart Start Preschool

How well placed is Smart Start Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Smart Start Preschool is a small, family-owned and operated service. It is licensed for 30 children from two years of age to school age. A third of the children enrolled are Māori. Most staff are qualified early childhood teachers. Three of the teaching team are family members. The preschool is located in a renovated historic villa in a residential area of Kamo.

The preschool's philosophy emphasises the importance of learning about Māori beliefs and using te reo Māori in meaningful ways in the programme. There is a focus on developing sustainable conservation practices, caring attitudes and providing opportunities for children to explore, research and problem solve.

The centre has made good progress since the 2015 ERO review, which recommended that the centre work with the Ministry of Education to develop a plan for implementing required improvements. They have developed a strategic plan, improved their performance management practices and further developed assessment, planning and evaluation processes. Areas of non-compliance identified in the 2015 ERO report have been addressed.

The Review Findings

Children experience respectful interactions with each other and their teachers. They confidently make choices about following their interests and their participation in the learning programme. All children, including Māori, have regular opportunities to hear and speak te reo Māori and to be part of the preschool's daily tikanga Māori practices.

Children play happily with and alongside each other in the well-resourced environments. They have access to an appropriate range of equipment in the interesting outside spaces. These areas invite children to challenge and foster their physical development. Children enjoy gardening as part of their learning about sustainable conservation practices.

Teachers are welcoming and inclusive. They know children and whānau well. Teachers willingly support parents and involve them in their child’s learning. They frequently communicate with parents and keep them well informed about their child's participation in the learning programme. Many of these conversations continue long after children leave the centre and enter school.

Teachers and staff work cooperatively. Together they provide a learning programme that is responsive to children’s interests and abilities. Teachers and staff see children as capable learners. They maintain an intentional focus on children’s learning and development. There are many opportunities for children to develop oral language and literacy skills. Teachers foster children’s thinking and creativity by extending their ideas through conversations and the wide range of readily available art experiences.

Transition into the centre is well paced to meet the needs of each child and their family. There is a purposeful approach to supporting children's successful transition to school as part of the learning programme.

Parents who spoke with ERO said that the centre is organised, relaxed and calm. They appreciate the play-based programme, the small number of children in the group and the range of choices available. Children with diverse needs are well supported.

Leaders intentionally support teachers and staff to improve their capability by using an online appraisal system and providing useful feedback. Leaders and teachers engage in professional discussions about children's learning and wellbeing and their own development. Leaders provide the teaching team with a range of relevant professional learning opportunities to support their work with children and whānau.

Leaders have developed a process for internal evaluation. They recognise the need to use it more comprehensively to look deeply at the impacts of changes made at the centre on outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

Leaders agree that the key next steps are to:

  • further develop assessment, planning and evaluation processes to:

    • ensure consistency of assessment practices and documentation
    • purposefully recognise children’s home languages and cultures in assessment and the centre environment
    • embed individual planning and evaluation processes
    • intentionally plan for groups of learners
  • strengthen internal evaluation by clearly identifying the impacts of changes made on outcomes for children

  • review the philosophy and redesign the strategic plan to align more closely with it and the centre vision.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Smart Start Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve current practice, leaders should ensure that:

  • there is a risk assessment and management plan for the garden area outside the licensed premises

  • earthquake drills occur regularly, at least every three months

  • parents approve the ratio of adults to children for all excursions.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Smart Start Preschool will be in three years.

Julie Foley

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

14 August 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Kamo, Whangarei

Ministry of Education profile number

10416

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children over 2 years of age

Service roll

36

Gender composition

Boys 25 Girls 11

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Chinese
other

13
17
3
3

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:7

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2018

Date of this report

14 August 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

October 2015

Education Review

September 2012

Education Review

February 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.