Immanuel Preschool

Education institution number:
10312
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
21
Telephone:
Address:

55 Clayton Avenue, Otara, Auckland

View on map

1 Evaluation of Immanuel Preschool

How well placed is Immanuel Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Immanuel Preschool is a small, privately owned centre. The centre promotes a Christian-based philosophy and values as its foundation for a bright future for children. It continues to provide an all-day programme for children from birth to school age. It caters for a maximum of 36 children including 10 children up to 2 years of age. Most children are of Māori, Samoan and Cook Island Māori descent.

The centre has been owned and managed by the same owner since 2009. Most teachers have taught in the centre for some years and represent the ethnicities of children. Most teachers are qualified early childhood teachers with two teachers working towards full registration.

The 2013 ERO report identified the need to improve programmes for children and provide appropriate work space for staff. A small workspace has recently been created for staff and there is now better provision for sleeping children.

Teachers have focused on developing an emergent curriculum, and have attended professional development to improve their understanding of Māori and Pacific cultures. They have further developed their transition to school programme with support from their parent and local school community. A newly created work space for staff is very small. The challenge remains to provide an area where staff can have space to undertake their professional tasks and to take adequate breaks.

The Review Findings

The manager and supervisor in this centre base relationships on respect, trust and reciprocity. They create opportunities for parents and whānau to respond, have input, and make decisions about the curriculum.

Teachers also promote strong reciprocal and respectful relationships. They use Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, to evaluate the centre curriculum. They recognise and value the importance of children's learning through play. Children's contributions in assessment and information from individual and group portfolios are used to help plan the curriculum and programme provided for children. Centre leaders could now consider the information they have about individual children's progress more closely as they plan for groups and individual children.

Teachers support children's learning through exploration, problem solving and experimentation. They provide feedback to children that acknowledges their effort and successes in their everyday learning and play. Teachers include aspects of literacy, numeracy and science concepts in children's learning programmes. Teachers should consider how they can integrate learning into children's play in contexts that are more meaningful for the children.

The centre philosophy acknowledges the Treaty of Waitangi. The curriculum fosters the children's understanding of biculturalism where teachers and leaders validate te ao Māori. Children are contributing to the development of a curriculum that is responsive to culture and identity. Teachers seek ways to maintain children's connections to their cultural identity

Centre routines are successfully implemented to support children's learning and wellbeing.

Teachers are keen to improve the quality of education and care through ongoing internal evaluation. They regularly reflect on their teaching practice in providing a meaningful curriculum. Self-review has provided improved outcomes for children. Internal evaluation informs decision making at governance level. Good systems are in place to monitor health and safety compliance matters.

Key Next Steps

The centre owner and supervisor agree that key next steps are to:

  • further increase the challenge and complexity of children's play,
  • integrate learning in meaningful contexts.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Immanuel Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Immanuel Preschool will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

14 September 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Otara, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10312

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

36 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

35

Gender composition

Girls 15 Boys 20

Ethnic composition

Māori

Samoan

Cook Island Māori

Niue

Tongan

Asian

12

9

8

3

2

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2016

Date of this report

14 September 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

July 2013

Education Review

March 2010

Education Review

March 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

1 Evaluation of the Service

How well placed is the service to promote positive outcomes for children?

Immanuel Preschool is continuing to develop its capacity to promote positive outcomes for children.

Context

Immanuel Preschool is a small, privately owned centre in Otara that promotes a Christian philosophy and values. It provides all-day programmes for children from birth to school age. There are separate areas for younger and older children, with opportunities during the day for children of different ages to play together. All children share the recently upgraded outdoor area.

The centre has been owned by the same owner since 2009. Many of the teachers, including the supervisor, have been part of the teaching team since 2010. Most teachers are qualified and are moving towards completing their teacher registration. Some teachers reflect the cultural backgrounds of children at the centre, all of whom have Māori, Samoan, Tongan, or Cook Island Māori heritage.

ERO’s 2010 report commented that the programme for children was interesting and varied, and that managers were building good self-review systems. Some progress has been made towards meeting ERO’s 2010 recommendations to improve self review and further develop the programme to give children opportunities for more challenging and complex learning. The 2010 ERO report also identified that significant progress had been made to meet Ministry of Education regulations. However some concerns remain in this 2013 ERO report.

Review Findings

Children settle easily to centre routines and engage happily in the programme. They choose from a variety of activities that adults provide for them and participate enthusiastically at mat times. Children play well alongside each other. They initiate and participate in conversations with other children and their teachers. The programme supports children’s literacy and numeracy learning in different ways during the day.

Older children participate in a transition programme that provides further opportunities for them to be self managing. Babies and toddlers experience warm and nurturing relationships with their teachers. They are appropriately supported with language development and self-help skills. Younger children enjoy playing and learning with older children at different times in the programme.

Teachers plan programmes based on themes that emerge from children’s interests. They have participated in professional learning and development (PLD) that is supporting them to improve programme planning, assessment and evaluation. Teachers encourage parent input into the programme and are interested in knowing what aspirations and goals parents have for their children.

The owner values self review and encourages staff and parents to contribute their perspectives and opinions about different aspects of the centre. Teachers are encouraged to trial different approaches and review the outcomes. Leaders are supporting teachers to accept critical feedback and to be more reflective about their practice. They are providing increasing opportunities for teachers to take leadership roles within the centre.

The owner expresses her commitment to improving the quality of education and care for children. She provides useful support for the supervisor and teachers to improve the quality of their practice.

Key Next Steps

ERO recommends that the owner continues to access external PLD for teachers to progress the following key next steps for the centre. Particular emphasis should be placed on ensuring that:

  • continued improvements are made to the programme, resources and environment for babies and toddlers, and to the outdoor learning environment to benefit children of all ages
  • teachers’ interactions with children are consistently positive
  • the programme continues to be clearly based on children’s emerging interests and child-centred principles
  • staff acknowledge the strengths of the different cultures they serve at the centre.

The owner has a responsibility to provide an appropriate workspace for staff, and a space away from children for staff to have breaks and complete professional tasks. She has plans in place to extend the centre to make such space available, and should now give this matter priority. This would also enable her to ensure that the sleep room for babies and toddlers is more appropriately furnished and used only for sleeping children.

2 Legal Requirements

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Immanuel Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

During the review ERO identified areas on non-compliance. In order to address these, the owner must ensure that:

  • space is available for children to sleep or rest for a reasonable period of time each day without disruption and that the space is designed to minimise fluctuations in temperature, noise and lighting levels
  • there is appropriate work space for adults to use for planned breaks, meet privately with parents and colleagues, store curriculum support materials and assess, plan and evaluate.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF9, PF33, PF37

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008, 45, 47e

To improve practice, the owner should also ensure that all records of police vetting of staff and adults who are in the centre frequently are easily accessible and kept up to date.

3 Next Review

When is ERO likely to review the early childhood service again?

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Dale Bailey National Manager Review Services Northern Region

8 July 2013

Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Otara, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10312

Licence type

All Day Education and Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Service roll

39

Gender composition

Boys 20 Girls 19

Ethnic composition

Māori

Samoan

Cook Island Māori

Tongan

9

18

10

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Exceeds minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:8

Exceeds minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2013

Date of this report

8 July 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

March 2010

March 2007

April 2004

General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

About ERO Reviews

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the New Zealand government department that reviews schools and early childhood services throughout New Zealand.

Review focus

ERO's education reviews in early childhood services focus on the factors that contribute to positive learning outcomes for children. ERO evaluates how well placed the service is to make and sustain improvements for the benefit of all children at the service. To reach these findings ERO considers:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of self review and partnerships with parents and whānau.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews do not cover every aspect of service performance and each ERO report may cover different issues. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.