Amanda's Homebased ECE 2

Education institution number:
10140
Service type:
Homebased Network
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
40
Telephone:
Address:

5c Henry Street, Avondale, Auckland

View on map

Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 - 17/04/2019

1 Evaluation of Amanda's Homebased ECE 2

How well placed is Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Amanda's Homebased ECE is a long-established provider of early childhood care and education in home settings. The service's philosophy expresses a commitment to quality homebased early childhood education (ECE) underpinned by a culture of professionalism.

This network was established with the intention of increasing the participation of children of migrant and refugee families in early childhood education. It is jointly managed as one of two networks currently operating in Auckland. It provides care and education for up to 80 children in educators' homes. There are currently 49 children enrolled in the network, 25 of whom are aged under two years, and 30 educators who work under the guidance and supervision of qualified coordinators called Education Team Leaders (ETLs). Most children and educators are of African or Middle Eastern heritage.

Since the 2015 ERO report, two new ETLs have been appointed to the team. There has also been a reduction in the number of children they can be responsible for supervising. Amanda's maintains better than minimum ratio requirements in this regard. All ETLs are registered early childhood teachers. The 2015 ERO report noted that the owner and ETLs work as a team and are committed to ongoing improvement. These strengths remain evident. The report also identified next steps for the service. These included better systems for supporting ETL practice, establishing strategic self-review, updating long-term planning, and strengthening the bicultural curriculum. While good progress has been made, continued work in these areas would further benefit the organisation.

The Review Findings

The service has high regard for the health, safety and wellbeing of children in its care. ETLs and educators know children well and monitor their ongoing development and learning. ETLs complete regular safety checks of homes, and the organisation provides basic equipment such as cots, car seats and strollers, as needed. ETLs ensure that children have access to a range of activities. They also provide learning resources to supplement those provided by the educator, according to the child's interests and developmental stage.

ETLs emphasise the importance of children learning through play. They support educators to enrich children's exploration through their discussions and monthly observations of each child. ETLs also organise regular, well attended playgroups that provide good opportunities for educators and children to socialise. ETLs introduce new activities at playgroups and model how to work with children to support their learning. Children and adults demonstrate a sense of belonging and enjoyment in this environment. The developmental milestones of children aged under two years are recognised and celebrated.

Providing children with authentic experiences of their heritage language and culture in a familiar environment is a priority for many families in this community. The majority of children are placed with a family member or someone connected with the family. Many of the educators have limited English as a second or additional language. ETLs are careful to support their discussions with them through regular communication with children's parents, and where needed, with other family members in the educator's home. An online portal allows parents and whānau to see the ETL monthly reports for their children, and to add their comments and stories. This portal also allows the organisation to keep families well informed about news and upcoming events.

The service is underpinned by genuine, supportive, culturally sensitive relationships. The organisation makes good use of translators to facilitate two-way communication and understanding. It provides regular professional learning and development (PLD) opportunities for educators to support them in their role. From time-to-time the service goes beyond the provision of early childhood education to support educators and families in other areas of their lives. It is evident that educators appreciate the support they receive from the organisation.

A culture of collaboration and open discussion is a strength of the management team. Leadership is promoted throughout the organisation. Strategic planning provides a useful framework for guiding decisions and improving systems and processes. Leaders could build on these positive foundations to strengthen support for the different approaches, strengths and development areas of the two networks. This would also help the organisation to evaluate the extent to which each service delivers on the service's overarching vision.

Key Next Steps

The service owner and ETLs agree that the next steps for improving the service include:

  • reviewing the philosophy in order to strengthen the guidance it provides for planning for the network, and for the ETLs and educators to work towards achieving the organisation's vision

  • continuing to develop internal evaluation to promote greater depth of inquiry into practice and consideration of outcomes for children

  • implementing strategies that will further support and strengthen the educators' practices, including the implementation of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and a bicultural curriculum, as well as regular written feedback about good practice and what could be improved

  • continuing to strengthen appraisal for ETLs.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services Northern
Northern Region

17 April 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service

Location

Avondale, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10140

Institution type

Homebased Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

80 children, including up to 80 aged under 2

Service roll

49

Standard or Quality Funded

Standard

Gender composition

Girls 27 Boys 22

Ethnic composition

Māori
African
Middle Eastern
other ethnic groups

2
25
19
3

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

3

Required ratios of staff educators to children

Under 2

1:2

Over 2

1:4

Review team on site

January 2019

Date of this report

17 April 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

April 2015

Education Review

June 2008

Education Review

October 2005

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 - 13/04/2015

1 Evaluation of Amanda's Homebased ECE 2

How well placed is Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Amanda’s Homebased ECE is a well-established service with educators located across Auckland. The service includes three networks, each with different characteristics. This report focuses on a network that features a Ministry of Education (MoE) Participation Project aimed at providing education and care for children from diverse cultures. A community of Somali, Afghani and Ethiopian families uses this network. There are currently 59 children enrolled, including nine under two years of age.

The service has three Educational Team Leaders (ETLs) who are registered teachers. They provide support and guidance for educators across the three networks. The owners have responsibility for the management of the service.

Since the 2008 ERO review Amanda’s Homebased ECE has undergone significant change. Its administration has relocated from central to west Auckland, two of the ETLs are new appointments and there have been changes in MoE funding. The service was relicensed in 2013 and has needed to meet new licensing requirements and expectations.

The Review Findings

The service has been proactive in providing education and care that meets the needs of its migrant community. It has supported the families in terms of employment, financial security, socialisation and education for both children and adults. The ETLs have been sensitive in introducing Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and in developing their expectations for formal learning records.

Educators provide a range of experiences for children in homes and in the community, including playgroup and group excursions. While ETLs continue to support educators to develop their play resources, children enthusiastically explore many activities at a weekly playgroup. They enjoy creative and manipulative materials as they build relationships with others and participate in physical activity and musical experiences. ETLs actively encourage children and educators to use their home languages as well as English.

Children are well supported to settle into educators' homes and to transition to school. ETLs monitor how well infants and toddlers adapt and help educators to establish daily diaries that record children’s routines and play interests. ETLs write affirming reports about children’s holistic development that provide very good information to support their entry into school.

Training opportunities have had a positive impact on educators’ practice. They are developing skills to set up learning environments and use equipment to engage children in play. Educators support children’s behaviour in positive ways. ETLs model effective teaching strategies at playgroup and encourage skills for positive social interaction. The playgroups also enable ETLs to establish very good relationships with educators and families in these diverse communities.

The owners and ETLs are a collegial team committed to ongoing improvement in the service. ETLs make regular home visits to the educators and have recently improved the quality of their monthly reports about children as a result of reflective self review.

A new appraisal system for ETLs has been implemented. The owners agree this process could be developed further to ensure ETLs set measurable goals and regularly evaluate their own progress. ETLs also want to strengthen their bicultural practices.

The owners share management responsibilities with the ETLs. They engage in ongoing discussions about priorities for the service and their vision to include new opportunities for diverse communities. This informal approach does not always support a clear direction for the service. The owners and ETLs recognise that they should now redefine the leadership structure and better document expectations. This would help them to sustain the service’s operations more effectively over time.

Key Next Steps

The service owners and ETLs agree that key next steps for improving the service include:

  • increasing the support for culturally diverse educators to understand the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand
  • improving documented systems to better support ETL practice in relation to their coaching roles, playgroup planning, parent contact and educator visit records
  • updating the strategic plan to reflect current priorities, set long-term direction and make provision for the regular evaluation of strategic goals
  • developing systems and a framework for the team to undertake planned, strategic self review.

The owners and ETLs recognise they should urgently implement documented systems for the effective monitoring of health and safety regulatory requirements.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

In order to improve practices the service should:

  • strengthen its risk management processes for excursions
  • ensure that all teacher registrations and police vets are renewed in a timely manner
  • adjust privacy practices to reflect changes in staffing, assessment tools and documentation
  • urgently implement documented systems for the effective monitoring of health and safety regulatory requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Amanda's Homebased ECE 2 will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

13 April 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10140

Licence type

Home-based Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

80 children, including up to 80 aged under 2

Service roll

59

Standard or Quality Funded

Standard Funded

Gender composition

Girls 32 Boys 27

Ethnic composition

Pākehā

African

Middle Eastern

Indian

Japanese

Other

2

43

9

2

2

1

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

3

Reported ratios of staff educators to children

Under 2

1:2

Meets minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:4

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2015

Date of this report

13 April 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2008

 

Education Review

October 2005

 

Education Review

July 2001

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.