Young Petals Early Learning Centre Drury

Education institution number:
25036
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
32
Telephone:
Address:

12A Cross Street, Drury

View on map

Young Petals Early Learning Centre Drury

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Young Petals Early Learning Centre Drury is a privately owned and operated service. A qualified owner/centre manager oversees daily operations and supports a team of six staff including four registered teachers. The majority of children attending are New Zealand European with a small number of Māori or Pacific children.

Summary of Review Findings

The service’s curriculum is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Teachers providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships.

The curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children are given the opportunity to develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Children are provided with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning. 

Consistent implementation of premises and facilities, health and safety and governance, management and administration practices is required to maintain compliance with the regulatory standards.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Maintaining the functionality of gates and latches installed to ensure children are not able to leave the premises without the knowledge of adults providing education and care.
  • Ensuring that premises, furniture, fittings, equipment, and materials are kept safe, hygienic and maintained in good condition.
  • Ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage is secured.
  • Ensuring water stored in any hot water cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60° Celsius.
  • Having a detailed record of each component of the safety check and its result, and the date of the risk assessment required to be completed after all relevant information is obtained.
  • Maintaining an attendance record that meets the requirements outlined in the Early Childhood Education Funding Handbook.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Services 2008; PF13, HS1, HS6, HS14, GMA7a, GMA11].

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

26 February 2024

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name: Young Petals Early Learning Centre Drury
Profile Number25036
Location Drury
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 80-99%
Service roll35
Review team on siteDecember 2023 
Date of this report26 February 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Akanuku | Assurance Review, December 2019

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a license to operate. 

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

Young Petals Early Learning Centre Drury Limited - 17/12/2019

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards
ERO’s judgement
CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Young Petals Early Learning Centre Drury Limited was relicensed under new ownership in 2018. The service was previously known as Scholar’s Preschool Drury Limited. Five of the eight staff, including the centre manager, are qualified teachers.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults engage in meaningful, positive interactions that enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The service’s curriculum is inclusive and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning.

A philosophy statement and annual plan guide the centre’s operations. The design and layout of the premises support a range of different types of indoor and outdoor experiences. Parents are provided with opportunities to be involved in decision-making about their child’s learning. Appropriate policies and procedures are in place to support health and safety and the provision of education in the centre.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • continuing to enhance outdoor experiences to extend learning for all children.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Education Review.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

17 December 2019

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameYoung Petals Early Learning Centre Drury Limited
Profile Number25036
LocationDrury, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers80%+
Reported ratio of staff to children under 21:3 - Better than regulatory standards
Reported ratio of staff to children over 21:6 - Better than regulatory standards
Service roll34
Gender compositionGirls 18 Boys 16
Ethnic compositionMāori 6; NZ European/Pākehā 22; other ethnic groups 6
Review team on siteNovember 2019
Date of this report17 December 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review, March 2016; Education Review, January 2013; Supplementary Review, November 2009

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Scholars Preschool Drury Limited - 31/03/2016

1 Evaluation of Scholars Preschool Drury Limited

How well placed is Scholars Preschool Drury Limited to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Scholars Preschool is a well-established centre in Drury, South Auckland. It provides education and care for up to 30 children including up to 10 children under the age of two. The centre is one of three managed collectively by the owner and the three centre managers. Together, they oversee the centres using a common set of policies and procedures that are adapted for each centre.

There are three play areas designed for each age group. These include an area for children under two, another for children between three and four years of age, and a third area for pre-schoolers. Children have many opportunities to play together indoors and outdoors. Teachers use the mixed aged play time to promote tuakana teina relationships as children grow and develop in the centre.

The centre's philosophy promotes opportunities for children to explore and discover through positive interactions with other children and adults. There are seven qualified teachers and this enables leaders to maintain low child/teacher ratios.

Centre leaders responded positively to the recommendations of the 2013 ERO report. They have made ongoing improvements to strengthen approaches to programme planning and assessment. In addition, the documentation of learning stories has been improved and te reo Māori is being integrated more frequently into the daily programme.

Indoor and outdoor play areas and staff amenities have been upgraded and there are further renovations, still to be completed. An after-school facility next to the centre provides ongoing links with some families once children have transitioned to school.

The Review Findings

Children and their parents and whānau are warmly welcomed into the centre. Children greet teachers and settle quickly into activities. Teachers and parents regularly discuss children's experiences and learning interests and this helps to strengthen the partnerships between home and the centre.

Children have access to a large outdoor space for play. They are confident to explore this area and enjoy the many challenges it offers them. Children play and share with each other and talk confidently with adults. They make choices about their play and teachers ask questions to strengthen children's understanding.

Teachers plan learning experiences for individual and groups of children. Currently, teachers are focusing on giving children more opportunities to lead learning activities. Assessment portfolios are a good record of children's involvement and interests. Leaders agree that the inclusion of children's voices in learning stories continues to be an area for improvement. Leaders are investigating the potential of electronic portfolios to encourage contributions from families.

There is very good care and education for children under two years. Teachers encourage children's language growth and understanding of the world around them. They provide challenges for children's physical and social development. Teachers keep parents well informed as children move through important developmental stages.

Teachers are more confident in their use of te reo Maori. Leaders identified the value of the teacher-led professional learning programme and support from a local iwi group. This has helped to develop teachers' confidence and competence with te reo. Leaders plan to continue supporting ongoing teacher development in bicultural practices.

Centre leaders value the strengths that individual staff members bring to their roles and they meet regularly with teachers to reflect on teaching practice. They support and provide targeted professional learning for teachers. Leaders are currently working with an external provider to review the teacher appraisal policy and procedures.

The centre manager manages all aspects of centre operations. She is well supported by her teachers. Leaders agree that it is timely to rationalise aspects of the centre manager's workload. They also identified as an important next step a review of governance and management documents to ensure there are clear links between policies and procedures. Practices that support distributive leadership are already becoming evident.

Key Next Steps

In order to build on current good practices, the owner, and centre managers agree that key next steps are to consider further ways to:

  • improve the quality of self-review so that it is more evaluative
  • create complex and innovative play that develops children's individual strengths and interests using targeted teaching strategies
  • strengthen teacher appraisal to ensure there are clear and transparent links to work expectations
  • strengthen the policy review cycle to ensure systematic checks and reviews are purposeful and useful.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Scholars Preschool Drury Limited completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Scholars Preschool Drury Limited will be in three years. 

Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

31 March 2016 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

LocationDrury, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number25036
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Service roll38
Gender compositionGirls       23
Boys      15
Ethnic compositionMāori
Pākehā
Cook Island Māori
Niue
Indian
  8
25
  2
  2
  1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:3Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:8Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteJanuary 2016
Date of this report31 March 2016
Most recent ERO report(s)Education ReviewJanuary 2013
Supplementary ReviewNovember 2009
Education ReviewSeptember 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.