Pirimai Kindergarten

Education institution number:
5283
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
41
Telephone:
Address:

Allen Berry Avenue, Pirimai, Napier

View on map

Pirimai Kindergarten

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for Pirimai Kindergarten are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whakaū Embedding

Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

This is one of 16 kindergartens governed and managed by the Napier Kindergarten Association. The philosophy prioritises respectful and nurturing relationships. One fifth of children are Māori and a small number have Pacific heritages. Progress has been made in response to the key next steps identified in the 2019 ERO report. 

3 Summary of findings

Children’s sense of belonging is fostered in a well-resourced environment. A range of meaningful opportunities enhances children’s developing independence and ability to make decisions about their learning. Their voices are valued, and they actively contribute to developing a local curriculum. Effective transition processes support children and families to settle into the service. Children with additional learning needs are supported to engage in learning alongside their peers. 

Connections to children’s home languages and cultures are visible through the curriculum. The languages and cultures of Māori and Pacific children are becoming more evident in documented assessment and the daily programme. Continued development of the local curriculum alongside whānau Māori and the wider community remains a focus. 

Assessment, planning, and evaluation processes are used to reflect and understand how children progress their learning. Teachers work with children and whānau in learning-focused partnerships. They gather, analyse, and use evidence of children’s learning and outcomes to improve individual and collective teacher practice. Evaluation is beginning to be used to recognise inequities in children’s outcomes through assessment information. 

The association works collaboratively to promote children’s equity of access to an inclusive education. This supports delivery of a consistent curriculum across all kindergartens. Robust monitoring, review and evaluation at association level are not yet evident. Information on improvements in individual kindergartens is not used by those in governance and management roles to identify how association actions impact on equitable outcomes for children. Understanding and implementation of systems and processes that support maintenance of regulatory requirements are inconsistent.

4 Improvement actions

Pirimai Kindergarten will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Further develop the local curriculum alongside whānau Māori and the wider community to include the histories, pūrākau and places of significance of mana whenua.
  • Strengthen evaluation of how well individual children and groups of children are progressing in terms of the kindergarten’s valued learning outcomes, to identify areas for improvement.

The Napier Kindergarten Association will include the following in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Identify trends and patterns from information gathered about the quality and effectiveness of teaching and learning in kindergartens to prioritise association-wide support, professional learning and development, and strategic direction.
  • Build governors’ and managers’ understanding of how to use this information to identify and respond to inequitable outcomes for groups of children. 
  • Build coherent and robust systems and practice across the organisation to support ongoing knowledge of, and compliance with, regulatory standards.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Pirimai Kindergarten completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Actions for Compliance 

During the review, the association provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Implementing suitable human resource management practices, including a documented system of regular appraisal (GMA7).
  • Having a written procedure for safety checking all children’s workers, and ensuring all children’s workers are safety checked every three years in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014 (GMA7A).  

Since the onsite visit, the service and the association have provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Having a written emergency plan that meets the requirements of the licensing criterion (HS7).
  • Having evidence that the review of the emergency plan on an annual basis is informed by kindergarten emergency drills (HS8).
  • Having a process for reviewing and evaluating the service’s operation that includes a schedule and timelines for planned review and evaluation of different areas of operation (GMA6).

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

20 December 2023 

7 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service NamePirimai Kindergarten
Profile Number5283
LocationPirimai, Napier
Service type Free Kindergarten
Number licensed for 44 children aged over two
Percentage of qualified teachers 100%
Service roll52
Review team on siteAugust 2023
Date of this report20 December 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, September 2019; Education Review, December 2015

Pirimai Kindergarten - 26/09/2019

1 Evaluation of Pirimai Kindergarten

How well placed is Pirimai Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Pirimai Kindergarten is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Pirimai Kindergarten in Napier provides early childhood education and care for up to 44 children aged over two. Morning sessions cater for two-year-olds and older children attend for six hours. The current roll is 46, including 14 Māori children. Since ERO's 2015 evaluation, there have been changes to the teaching team and to the head teacher position.

The kindergarten philosophy emphasises 'respectful, nurturing relationships where children learn best through play, in an inclusive and beautiful environment that is rich in literacy and numeracy artefacts'. The kindergarten is a member of the enviroschools programme.

Pirimai Kindergarten is one of 16 kindergartens operating under the governance and management of the Napier Kindergarten Association (the association). The governing board is responsible for setting the overall strategic direction for the organisation. The day-to-day operation of the association is the role of the general manager. Two education managers provide teaching and learning support for teachers. The board employs a Pou Whakarewa Mātauranga (Professional Practice Advisor Māori) to work alongside all association personnel to continue to strengthen cultural responsiveness.

Many areas identified as strengths in the December 2015 ERO report continue. The key next step identified in the previous ERO report, use of internal evaluation, continues to be an area for the kindergarten to strengthen.

This review was part of a cluster of 16 reviews in the Napier Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children benefit from the child-led, play-based curriculum that encourages them to make choices and follow their interests. Thoughtfully organised outdoor spaces allow them to explore, engage with nature and play independently.

Flexible routines allow children to self-manage and make decisions about their participation in learning activities. Many children sustain their involvement in play for extended periods. There are good levels of collaborative play and tuakana teina relationships. A sense of belonging is evident for children and their families.

Teachers use a good range of strategies for promoting children's social skills. Children's wellbeing is fostered. There are many examples of the values and beliefs of the kindergarten philosophy evident in children's experiences in the programme.

Children with additional needs are well supported. Teachers work with external agencies and parents to progress children's learning goals.

Transition in to the kindergarten is managed respectfully and with care. These transitions are flexible and responsive to meet individual needs. Relationships with local schools are being re-established to support the move to school for families.

Teachers continue to work with the association's Pou Whakarewa Mātauranga to further grow their knowledge of te ao Māori. Te reo me ngā tikanga Māori are promoted through routine times and as part of the kindergarten's involvement in the Enviroschools programme.

Children's portfolio books are a useful and meaningful record of their involvement in individual or group experiences at kindergarten and in the community. ERO, the Head Teacher and Education Manager agree that improving aspects of assessment and planning processes is a next step. This includes:

  • identifying the deliberate strategies teachers use to extend individual's learning and how well these have worked to progress learning
  • making visible children's language, culture and identity.

The head teacher encourages staff to share their strengths and to lead aspects of the programme. Areas of practice that require improvement are given appropriate priority.

Strengthening the teaching team's understanding and use of evaluation and how well it contributes to high quality practice and outcomes for children is a next step. Education managers should continue to grow their own knowledge and practice of internal evaluation to better support this process.

The governing board is future-focused and has developed a clear strategic direction to meet the diverse needs of its communities. Board members value diversity of viewpoints and gather community and employee voice to inform decision-making. Regular reporting by the education managers is useful in identifying how strategic teaching and learning goals are being addressed.

The board places importance on developing teachers' capabilities. Targeted and deliberate building of cultural responsiveness supports Māori children and their whānau to experience success. An association-wide appraisal process is in place to support teaching practice that promotes positive learning outcomes for children. Further strengthening of the appraisal process, including targeted observations, should assist teachers to determine how well they are progressing and actively encourage them to improve their effectiveness.

Key Next Steps

The key next steps for Pirimai Kindergarten are to:

  • strengthen understanding and use of internal evaluation for improvement to know the impact of teacher practices on children’s learning
  • improve the quality and consistency of assessment, planning and evaluation processes.

Education managers should continue to promote sustained improvement and innovation through strengthening:

  • evaluation, inquiry and professional guidance
  • the appraisal process.

Recommendation

Education managers should strengthen their understanding and use of internal evaluation to systematically evaluate their practices and the impact of these on outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Pirimai Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for Compliance

ERO identified an area of non-compliance relating to health and safety practices. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • excursion documentation to ensure that parents are informed of and provide signed consent to the regulated ratio for any excursion undertaken.
    [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS17]

To improve compliance practice:

  • Since the onsite phase of ERO's evaluation, the kindergarten and education manager have revised and strengthened procedures in relation to the supervision of children’s eating.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services Central

Central Region

26 September 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationNapier
Ministry of Education profile number5283
Licence typeFree Kindergarten
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for44 children aged over 2
Service roll46
Gender compositionFemale 24, Male 22
Ethnic compositionMāori 
NZ European/Pākehā 
Other ethnic groups
14
30
2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to children1:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteAugust 2018
Date of this report26 September 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewDecember 2015
Education ReviewSeptember 2012
Education ReviewJune 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Pirimai Kindergarten - 17/12/2015

1 Evaluation of Pirimai Kindergarten

How well placed is Pirimai Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below. 

Background

Pirimai Kindergarten in Napier provides early childhood education and care for up to 44 children aged over two. Morning sessions cater for three-year-olds and older children attend for six hours. The current roll is 47 children, including 15 Māori children.

The kindergarten is part of the Napier Kindergarten Association, which oversees the operation of 16 kindergartens including two based in Wairoa. A board of trustees oversees governance for the association and support for the general manager. Two educational managers are responsible for building teacher capability. The head teacher provides strong professional leadership to the teaching team. A recently appointed Pou Whakarewa Matauranga supports teachers to develop their knowledge and understanding of te ao Māori. He demonstrates a clear vision for Māori children and their whānau.

Strong relationships and parent, family and wider Napier community support are features of the kindergarten. A carefully planned and extensive kindergarten environment supports successful learning. The strengths identified in the September 2012 ERO report continue and progress. This includes improved individual learning opportunities, inclusive practice, self review and further embedding bicultural practices since joining Enviroschools.

This review was part of a cluster of nine reviews in the Napier Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

The kindergarten curriculum successfully responds to each child’s interests and learning needs. A greater emphasis on values-based education in the kindergarten philosophy reflects the wishes of children and their families. Children display caring, respectful and trusting relationships with staff and each other. They are empowered to self manage and lead their learning. 

Children are very well supported by teachers to make choices. Social and emotional competency is effectively promoted through close tracking and monitoring of children’s learning. Teaching strategies deliberately focus on extending individual interests and seamlessly meet identified needs. External expertise is used well. Weekly team meetings enable ongoing evaluation of the impact of teacher planning for each child. High expectations for teaching and learning are well informed by sound team research and collaborative thinking.

Well-integrated te ao Māori in the curriculum is further strengthened through participation in the
Enviroschool programme. Literacy, including oral language, mathematics and the arts remain strengths of the curriculum. Children enjoy a comprehensive range of resources that encourages them to explore and try new things. Skilful teaching contributes to sustained play and more effective learning opportunities.

The head teacher effectively leads assessment, planning and evaluation through robust systems and processes. Professional learning, ongoing monitoring and moderation of assessment of children’s learning supports teachers to increase each child’s learning over time. Positive learning partnerships with parents are further extended by sharing strategies with parents through different approaches. Te Whatu Pokekā: a kaupapa Māori framework for assessment is being carefully considered in relation to Māori children’s learning. Teachers collaborate, share good practice and are challenged to extend each child’s learning.

The head teacher’s professional leadership effectively grows teacher capability and encourages other head teachers in the association to share their expertise with each other. A comprehensive kindergarten strategic plan meaningfully guides operations and has a strong accountability focus on improving outcomes for all children. Appraisal is thorough and continues to develop. Teachers are clearly affirmed for their individual growth and actively encouraged to continue to improve their effectiveness.

Purposeful self-review practices lead to positive changes and improvements for children and their families. Children's and parents' views inform curriculum developments. Transitions to school are 
well considered through sound relationships with a wide range of schools.

The association empowers teachers to use the team’s strengths to respond to children and the parent community. The head teacher is supported to lead the development of robust systems and processes to effectively build teacher capability and leadership. This includes self review, assessment, planning, evaluation and appraisal.

Key Next Steps

The key next step for kindergarten teachers and education managers is to further extend review and evaluation processes to identify how well teachers practices and the curriculum support the realisation of the kindergarten's priorities for children's learning. 

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Pirimai Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Pirimai Kindergarten will be in four years. 

Joyce Gebbie
Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

17 December 2015 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

LocationNapier
Ministry of Education profile number5283
Licence typeFree Kindergarten
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for44 children, aged over 2
Service roll47
Gender compositionBoys 30, Girls 17
Ethnic compositionMāori
Pākehā
Samoan
Chinese
Other ethnic groups
15
26
  2
  2
  2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenOver 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteNovember 2015
Date of this report17 December 2015
Most recent ERO report(s)Education ReviewSeptember 2012
Education ReviewJune 2009
Education ReviewMarch 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.