Aspiring Kiwis Educare

Education institution number:
45716
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
26
Telephone:
Address:

128 Bankwood Road, Chartwell, Hamilton

View on map

Antarctica Early Learning School - 27/11/2019

1 Evaluation of Antarctica Early Learning School

How well placed is Antarctica Early Learning School to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Antarctica Early Learning School is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Antarctica Early Learning School, located in the Hamilton suburb of Fairfield, is licensed to provide all-day education and care for 42 children up to six years of age. The centre operates two aged-based rooms with shared outdoor spaces. Children come from a diverse range of ethnic backgrounds and for many English is a second language. At the time of this review, 42 children were enrolled, including 31 who identify as Māori.

Through the service's vision and philosophy teachers aim to develop relationships based on 'integrity, respect, nurture and trust'. They state that 'relationships underpin all learning between children, their whānau and teachers under Māori principles of aroha, whanaungatanga and wānanga'.

Since the May 2016 ERO report, Antarctica Early Learning School has been under new ownership. The centre manager supported by an assistant manager oversees teaching practices. A newly appointed teaching team consists of qualified and unqualified staff. Teachers' diversity of cultural backgrounds reflects that of children and families in the centre. Leadership provides an overarching governance and management framework for enacting the strategic direction.

The Review Findings

Children benefit from reciprocal and responsive interactions with teachers. Relationships between families and teachers are affirming, respectful and highly valued. Parents contribute and participate in the centre programme on a regular basis. Literacy, mathematics and science are naturally woven throughout the programme. Teachers should now consider ways to add complexity and challenges for older learners through intentional teaching and planning.

Parents' views and aspirations for their children are responded to. Learning portfolios reflect children’s engagement in the life of the centre. Children with additional learning needs are well supported through ongoing individualised planning and external support. The centre's philosophy is strongly evident in teaching practice. Children enjoy learning in meaningful contexts.

The curriculum is responsive to the strengths and interests of children. Families are welcomed by teachers into a peaceful, family-like environment. Tikanga Māori is respectfully implemented through karakia kai, sharing waiata and learning about Papatūānuku. The languages, cultures and identities of Pacific and other ethnic groups are highly prioritised in planning. Children up to the age of two years benefit from individualised routines and form secure attachments with familiar caring adults. Positive transitions into and out of the centre support children's confidence and sense of belonging. Children are empowered to take increasing responsibility for themselves, others and the environment.

Leaders base relationships on respect, trust and reciprocity. Emergent leadership amongst teachers is encouraged. There are opportunities for regular professional learning and development with ongoing mentoring and support for teachers. Leaders have developed clear guidelines and expectations for teaching practice and curriculum delivery.

Strong systems and processes guide centre operation. Internal evaluation is improvement focused and includes ongoing consultation with families and whānau. Leaders should evaluate the impact of intentional teaching strategies used, to ascertain how well these promote positive learning outcomes for children. There is clear alignment between the strategic direction and annual plans. The appraisal process supports teachers to strengthen their practice. A range of initiatives remove barriers to education and support wellness for children. The organisation's philosophy, vision and goals promote positive learning outcomes for all children.

Key Next Steps

The key next steps for leaders and teachers are to:

  • further refine and enhance internal evaluation processes to ensure they are more clearly focused on intentional teaching practices and outcomes for learners

  • deliberately plan and implement learning experiences for older learners, in order to add more complexity to their learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Antarctica Early Learning School completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services Central

Central Region

27 November 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

45716

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

42 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Service roll

42

Gender composition

Female 23 Male 19

Ethnic composition

Māori
Other ethnic groups

31
11

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

September 2019

Date of this report

27 November 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

May 2016

Education Review

August 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Antarctica Early Learning School - 05/05/2016

1 Evaluation of Antarctica Early Learning School

How well placed is Antarctica Early Learning School to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Antarctica Early Learning School is an all-day education and care service located in the Hamilton suburb of Fairfield. It operates two age group areas that share an outside play area. It is licensed for 42 children with up to 8 under two years of age.

The service is privately owned and the owner is the centre manager. There are two head teachers for each age group area who oversee the day-to-day running of the service. Since the previous ERO review the centre has improved the provision of resources and teachers have undertaken professional development to develop self-review practices.

The centre philosophy is currently under review. It recognises Te Tiriti o Waitangi and includes the provision of a culturally sensitive environment where te reo and tikanga Māori is promoted. There is an emphasis on promoting tuakana-teina relationships where the values of whakawhanaungatanga support a strong sense of belonging.

The Review Findings

Children are welcomed into an inclusive calm and settled environment. Trusting and respectful relationships are a feature of the centre and strongly promote children and whānau wellbeing.

Teachers affirm children's contributions and encourage active exploration through child-initiated interests and play. They are able to use their imagination and be creative, supporting them to develop deeper understandings about the world they live in. Self-care skills are also encouraged by teachers who view children as capable, empowering them to make decisions and choices about things that affect them.

The bicultural intent of Te Whāriki (the early childhood curriculum) is successfully implemented into the daily programme. Māori children's cultural identity and language is affirmed through experiences in te reo and tikanga Māori. All children benefit from developing an understanding and appreciation for New Zealand's bicultural heritage. Literacy, mathematics, science and the arts are integrated meaningfully throughout the programme. Children receive other rich and authentic curriculum experiences through outings to local parks, local schools, shops and the library.

Teachers involve themselves in children's play and have learning conversations about their interests. Children enjoy the social interactions they have with teachers and their peers. Tuakana-teina relationships provide older children with increased responsibility and leadership roles through supporting the learning of younger children. These positive interactions support children's learning and social development.

Teachers know children and whānau well. They embrace parent partnerships in learning and have regular conversations with them about their child's learning successes. Portfolios also provide whānau and children with a record of children's learning and time in the centre. Whānau appreciate the relationship they have with teachers and they feel part of their child's education.

Management and teachers work collaboratively. It would be useful for the centre owner and lead teachers to develop more robust quality assurance and reporting processes. This should clearly identify and report on the quality of education children are receiving at the centre. It should also help management and teachers to set future goals and strategic direction for the service. Teacher's involvement in literacy professional development has resulted in self-review practices that are leading to improvement in learning outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

The next steps for ongoing development are:

  • identifying systematic strategic and self-review practices that are focused on outcomes for children

  • implementing teacher appraisals

  • strengthening assessment practices to show children's progress over time, and teachers responses to parents aspirations for their child's learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Antarctica Early Learning School completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Antarctica Early Learning School will be in three years.

Lynda Pura-Watson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

5 May 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Fairfield, Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

45716

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

42 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Service roll

34

Gender composition

Boys 20 Girls 14

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Kiribati

Other

Cook Island

Indian

Samoan

19

7

3

2

1

1

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2016

Date of this report

5 May 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

August 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.