Active Explorers Airport

Education institution number:
25124
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
37
Telephone:
Address:

(International Airport) 6 Uenuku Way, Auckland Airport, Auckland

View on map

Airport Lollipops Educare - 18/10/2018

1 Evaluation of Airport Lollipops Educare

How well placed is Airport Lollipops Educare to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Airport Lollipops Educare is licensed for 125 children, including up to 40 aged under two years. Children and families come from diverse cultural backgrounds. Māori children make up 10 percent of the roll, 32 percent have Pacific heritage and 10 percent are Indian.

Infants and toddlers have separate indoor and outdoor play spaces. Two rooms for older children share an outdoor area. The manager and four head teachers lead teaching teams that include seven qualified teachers, four teachers in training, and six unqualified staff.

The service's philosophy is strongly underpinned by whakawhanaungatanga and a belief that environments should be "inclusive, flexible, sustainable, caring and filled with aroha".

The 2015 ERO report affirmed the centre's flexible programme and representation of children's cultures. Good opportunities and space for infants and toddlers to engage in uninterrupted play were noted. These practices continue to be evident. Areas for development included programme planning, internal evaluation, and bicultural practices. A review of health and safety policies and procedures was also suggested. There has been some progress in these areas.

The centre is owned by the Evolve Education Group. Evolve provides an overarching governance and management framework and visiting personnel to support the operation of each centre. A recent re-branding of centres has occurred, with a view to building a greater sense of unity across the organisation. Initiatives that have been recently introduced are intended to improve staff stability in centres, promote effective internal evaluation and lift the quality of teaching practices.

This review was part of a cluster of eight reviews in the Evolve Education Group.

The Review Findings

Children are articulate, friendly and confident, and choose to play with friends or on their own. Teachers' welcoming approach has supported the development of strong relationships with parents and whānau, many of whom contribute resources and ideas to the programme.

Teachers support children's learning and wellbeing by:

  • providing high teacher child ratios that foster trust and relationship building

  • providing a consistent teaching team for infants, toddlers and others

  • supporting smooth transitions for children as they move through the centre.

They should now review how they can:

  • involve children in taking greater responsibility for their immediate environments

  • use group times effectively to encourage children's involvement and promote child-led learning

  • build effective partnerships with whānau, based on planning for children's learning.

Teachers are gaining confidence in using te reo Māori with children. They are committed to deepening their knowledge of Māori culture and strengthening their bicultural practices. Increasing the provision of multicultural resources would help to recognise and support the cultural identity of all children.

Teachers plan activities and resources in response to group interests and dispositions. Building on individual children's prior learning, ideas and theories in their planning would help teachers to provide a more responsive curriculum.

Leaders are embedding the use of a new appraisal system. Targeted professional development and individual mentoring approaches related to teachers' goals, will strengthen professional practice. To strengthen internal evaluation leaders and teachers should evaluate the impact of changes made on outcomes for children.

The centre is managed effectively. More consistent use of centre audits established by Evolve would help to implement policies, procedures and the curriculum. Centre leaders and teachers have begun to establish a strategic plan to guide the centre's development.

Key Next Steps

The centre manager agrees that key next steps include:

  • developing an annual plan to support the achievement of the centre's strategic goals

  • reviewing and implementing a centre philosophy that aligns with Te Whāriki 2017

  • increasing the rigour of programme evaluation by critically examining how effectively teaching practices improve outcomes for children

  • developing deliberate teaching approaches to promote complex thinking and child-led learning.

Evolve Education Group managers agree that key next steps include:

  • ensuring the company’s vision, values, philosophy, goals and systems reflect the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi

  • developing clear strategic goals to inform improvement focused annual plans at regional, area and centre levels, that include Te Whāriki 2017 and a strategy for supporting Pacific children and families

  • ongoing moderation and monitoring of the roles and responsibilities of personnel in positions of leadership, including centre managers

  • ongoing monitoring of appraisal practices to ensure effective implementation is lifting teaching practice

  • reviewing how effectively levels of resourcing in centres support children’s learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Airport Lollipops Educare completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Airport Lollipops Educare will be in three years.

Violet Tu’uga Stevenson

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

18 October 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Auckland Airport

Ministry of Education profile number

25124

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

125 children, including up to 40 aged under 2

Service roll

114

Gender composition

Boys 53% Girls 47%

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Samoan
Indian
Tongan
Cook Island Māori
other Pacific
other ethnic groups

11%
43%
14%
11%
7%
5%
6%
3%

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:7

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

August 2018

Date of this report

18 October 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

February 2015

Education Review

February 2012

Education Review

November 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Airport Lollipops Educare - 11/02/2015

1 Evaluation of Airport Lollipops Educare

How well placed is Airport Lollipops Educare to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Airport Lollipops Educare is a well established early childhood centre, providing care and education for children from birth to school age. The centre is located in purpose-built premises within the vicinity of Auckland Airport. It is part of the Lollipops franchise, independently owned and operated by a Trust. The centre is licensed for 110 children, including a maximum of 40 children up to 2 years.

The 2012 ERO report identified some good practices that contributed to positive outcomes for children. Management and operations of the centre were well organised. Robust systems that were then in place continue to guide decision-making. Strong relationships with families have been maintained and children continue to enjoy positive, affectionate relationships with adults at the centre.

Children are cared for in four age-related groups. The outdoor environment is divided into three main play areas: one area for infants and toddlers, another for toddlers and younger children and the other for preschoolers.

The leadership team is made up of the centre owner, who oversees the operational and administrative aspects of the service, the centre manager and the curriculum manager. The four rooms are led by class coordinators who are responsible for the smooth running of daily programmes.

The Review Findings

Children are confident and are capable communicators. They have developed skills to build and sustain friendships. Children know routines well and trust that adults are there to support their needs. They have a strong sense of wellbeing and belonging.

The learning environment is accessible for children with good indoor and outdoor flow. The curriculum areas are well defined and children involve themselves in the activities that they choose. The programme is flexible and allows for children to engage in sustained periods of play. Children with Pacific heritages can see their cultures displayed in different areas of the learning environment. It is timely now for teachers to consider how they could strengthen the programme to further support children in their identity, culture and language.

Infants and toddlers are provided with ample play space which provides them with good opportunities to enjoy uninterrupted safe play. They respond well to the easy pace of the programme. Infants and toddlers are familiar with staff and older toddlers show developing capacity to initiate conversations with adults. Some teachers are in tune with children’s non-verbal communication.

Staff are positive, sensitive and responsive to children and their families. They are committed to providing an inclusive programme for all children. The ethnic diversity of the teaching team reflects the community they serve. Some teachers use te reo Māori and children’s home languages when communicating with children as they play.

Children’s language development is supported well by adults. Staff could now increase the use of questioning to extend the complexity and creativity to children’s thinking.

Programme planning identifies and responds to the learning attributes of individual children. Teachers work with parents to gather and include their ideas and aspirations for children’s learning in their child’s portfolio.

Children have meaningful opportunities for literacy and mathematics learning throughout the programme. The infant and toddler teaching team continue to embed the learning they have gained through their professional development in 2014.

Parents interviewed by ERO indicated they felt welcomed and supported. They appreciate the efforts that staff take to settle their children and are satisfied with the programme. Parents affirm the strong relationships they share with the staff.

Since the 2011 ERO review, appointments of key personnel in the centre have supported the centre manager and increased leadership capacity. The leadership team is improvement focused. Teaching teams are becoming more involved in self review so that it contributes to positive outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders agree that for teachers to further improve outcomes for children, they could consider:

  • continuing to strengthen programme planning processes more by identifying and responding to the interests of individual children
  • continuing to strengthen self review by making the team’s research more evident and using quality indicators and reflective questions to evaluate programmes, teaching practices, and outcomes for children.

In addition, leaders could review:

  • staffing in the infant and toddler rooms to further develop the professional knowledge about quality care and effective teaching practice for this age group
  • the environment, with a view to better supporting children to develop understandings of the dual cultural heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Airport Lollipops Educare completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

The centre is aware of the need for all staff to be Police vetted and for vets to be current.

To improve current practice the early childhood service management should:

  • review health and safety policies and procedures to ensure they meet requirements and guide practice
  • align the centre’s teacher appraisal process more clearly with Registered Teacher Criteria [The Education Act 1989, (319D to 319FA), Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood and Care Centre and Early Childhood Curriculum Framework 2008 (HS1-33,) Education Act 1989 (part 10), Education (Registration of Early Childhood Services Teachers) Regulations 2004.]

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Airport Lollipops Educare will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

11 February 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Auckland Airport, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25124

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

120 children, including up to 40 aged under 2

Service roll

111

Gender composition

Boys 57

Girls 54

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Indian

Samoan

Tongan

Cook Island Māori

Niue

Chinese

Fijian

Tokelauan

other Asian

other European

other

28

32

9

9

8

6

4

3

2

2

2

5

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2014

Date of this report

11 February 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

February 2012

 

Education Review

November 2008

 

Education Review

February 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.